mr.hands said:
Child of Eden will not be more compelling than Rez because of kinect. It is really unimaginative if you were playing rez while still conscious of holding a controller.
You obviously missed the last round of previews because some people clearly do find it more compelling than playing with a controller, including some of NeoGAF members who've had the chance to spend a fair amount of time with it.
But I wasn't saying that at all, I wasn't making any comparative judgements. One doesn't have to be
more compelling than the other, they can both be compelling and worthy experiences in their own right and for different reasons.
And no, kinect was not one of the biggest risks: the Wii proved for 4 years that a large number of people will buy things as long as they are accessible and 'fun'
That's not necessarily true, there are hundreds of various products released every year that are both accessible and fun, yet they fail to reach anything resembling Kinect's level of success - if any success at all. But I agree that Wii was probably a bigger risk. However, apart from that, I see nothing happening during this generation that was riskier than Kinect.
Let's not forget that very few people believed in it; in fact, it was a laughing stock. They doubted that the tech could even work, they doubted that people would care for it, especially at that price point, they doubted that the software would sell and they doubted that it could be used for creating compelling core experiences. With Child of Eden seemingly achieving just that, every last one of those doubts has been put to rest.