Infinite Justice
Member
I wonder if this 3 years is their worse case scenario.
Price to build will fall with time. The 3 years most likely has that and price drops built into it.viciouskillersquirrel said:Three years? That's twelve quarters with no room for a price drop if sales tank. This is good for the consumer, but as time goes on, I find myself asking "Just who in the hell is running this company??"
claviertekky said:Risky move for Sony.
If software doesn't sell, then this is a recipe for failure.
But the source is Kaz and when he's honoust he's honoust.SolidSnakex said:Way too many people think that since they read financial reports that they have a full grasp of how a company can and can't operate. Brian Crecente mentioned that he talked to Sony before E3 and they told him that they set a price for the Vita and then built it to that price. So this has been their plan for years.
TheOddOne said:But the source is Kaz and when he's honoust he's honoust.
outunderthestars said:All companies except for (greedy) Nintendo.....
onQ123 said:
tell me morebummyhead said:Which proves that Sony doesn't know how to build reasonable hardware. I wonder how many people are gonna shell out for a Vita version of a game when a better PS3 version can be had? Let's face it, it's entirely unlikley the Vita will get any system selling exclusives.
Sony subscribes the the Tim Taylor school of console design. "More Power, ar ar ar ar ar"
bummyhead said:Which proves that Sony doesn't know how to build reasonable hardware. I wonder how many people are gonna shell out for a Vita version of a game when a better PS3 version can be had? Let's face it, it's entirely unlikley the Vita will get any system selling exclusives.
Sony subscribes the the Tim Taylor school of console design. "More Power, ar ar ar ar ar"
No, I think he meant biggest shysters in the world Nintendo.Ichor said:You mean smart Nintendo?
bummyhead said:Let's face it, it's entirely unlikley the Vita will get any system selling exclusives.
Seventh said:I wonder how much of a loss they're taking at launch. Three years to make a profit seems... unwise. That seems like a fairly long time, and you never know what may happen that will delay any potential profits. I'm surprised they're willing to lose money on it for so long after what happened with the PS3.
And just to clarify, does anyone know if Sony is only talking about the hardware? Or are they including all the games and accessories in their estimate when talking about making a profit? I assume it's the former, but I'm not sure.
SolidSnakex said:I'm talking about the people that seem to think that Sony can't do this.
Mama Robotnik said:That's a really good point.
Not only are they gambling that the device is a sales success, they're gambling that it won't be hacked by pirates.
Considering they just made themselves public enemy number one with many of the hackers on the planet, its a hell of a risk.
Mama Robotnik said:That's a really good point.
Not only are they gambling that the device is a sales success, they're gambling that it won't be hacked by pirates.
Considering they just made themselves public enemy number one with many of the hackers on the planet, its a hell of a risk.
outunderthestars said:http://www.abload.de/img/gd2r738.png[IMG]
Gravity says hello.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, probably not. UC will be more of a system seller than whatever that game is. I have a feeling we will see some more "system sellers" before the system is released.
Again, I say - no room to manouever if sales tank. Price drops that are planned years ahead of time usually make a bunch of assumptions regarding the product life cycle, which can often be wrong.demosthenes said:Price to build will fall with time. The 3 years most likely has that and price drops built into it.
Infinite Justice said:I wonder if this 3 years is their worse case scenario.
Ahhh ok.SolidSnakex said:I'm talking about the people that seem to think that Sony can't do this.
BorkBork said:Jesus Sony. Three years?! Pretty risky gamble if the piracy problems of the PSP are repeated.
scorpscarx said:I've been reading this thread and honestly, I am more concerned with the desire to use this as a web-browser, game machine for at night laying in bed. Any news on the quality of the web-browser? Or OLED's ability to display text.
On topic though, Sony makes amazing hardware, and saying they sell it at a loss should only increase the consumer's demand for it.
bummyhead said:Which proves that Sony doesn't know how to build reasonable hardware. I wonder how many people are gonna shell out for a Vita version of a game when a better PS3 version can be had? Let's face it, it's entirely unlikley the Vita will get any system selling exclusives.
Sony subscribes the the Tim Taylor school of console design. "More Power, ar ar ar ar ar"
Gaf is never happyJustin_Bailey said:Why are some of you so worried about Sony selling this for a loss? You honestly think this piece of hardware is going to make or break the company? Sony is a global corporation that has had its share of successes and failures in history. They are not betting the farm on this handheld.
Seriously guys, you bitch if they price hardware too high, and when they finally make something affordable, we find a way to complain about that too.
Ichor said:You mean smart Nintendo?
Justin_Bailey said:Why are some of you so worried about Sony selling this for a loss? You honestly think this piece of hardware is going to make or break the company? Sony is a global corporation that has had its share of successes and failures in history. They are not betting the farm on this handheld.
Seriously guys, you bitch if they price hardware too high, and when they finally make something affordable, we find a way to complain about that too.
outunderthestars said:All companies except for (greedy) Nintendo sell hardware at a loss at launch.....
googleplex said:Any loss will most likely be made up by the purchase of an over priced memory card.
And they won't take a loss on the 3g sku, due to it being subsidized by AT&T contracts.
It also shows how Nintendo doesn't know how to reasonably price their hardware.bummyhead said:Which proves that Sony doesn't know how to build reasonable hardware. I wonder how many people are gonna shell out for a Vita version of a game when a better PS3 version can be had? Let's face it, it's entirely unlikley the Vita will get any system selling exclusives.
Sony subscribes the the Tim Taylor school of console design. "More Power, ar ar ar ar ar"