Of course they should ignore it for this show. I just think calling its canon nature in to question whitewashes the facts. It was done, it's ridiculous, and we're going to ignore it.The original pilot for Star Trek, The Cage, was set aboard the Enterprise in this era (IIRC, that was set 11 years before TOS, while this is 10). It was later turned into a 2 part episode, so it's canon (as far as TOS goes).
The trailer looks nothing like the Cage in terms of ships, uniforms, equipment, etc
Beyond that, they throw out a lot of other stuff in TOS when it's not convenient. Like in TOS, it was a key plot point that Romulans looked identical to Vulcans. Some random crew member thought Spock was a Romulan spy. Yet in TNG, suddenly Romulans no longer look like Vulcans, but have these Vs stuck on their foreheads.
So I think they could overlook a silly rule from on TOS episode (which frankly, was rather jarring then, much less now). Especially as TOS arguably contradicted itself, Uhura was in the command chair at least once and again, back in the Cage, the 1st Officer was a woman (Chapel)
That's all fine, i'm glad they have retconed it, but that's what it is, a retcon.I mean, the episode was clearly a comment on sexism - particularly when they were supposedly told that Majel Barrett couldn't be in a command role - but it's one of those things where the writers didn't think about continuity or the effect it would have on future spinoffs.
Okuda's text commentary for the episode even mentions this and how they had to "decanonize" it with Star Trek Enterprise.
Well, similarly with all the women wearing short skirts and gogo boots. lolThat's all fine, i'm glad they have retconed it, but that's what it is, a retcon.
Yeah, it is. Which is fine, such changes are understandable and appropriate. Like I said before, calling this change not a retcon to me just feels like it's trying to cover up Gene's mistakes (I don't think that's what you are doing, I mean in general).Well, similarly with all the women wearing short skirts and gogo boots. lol
I mean, it is what it is.
Well, if his son's documentary is any indication, Gene wasn't even working on the show during S3 anyway and just collecting paychecks.Yeah, it is. Which is fine, such changes are understandable and appropriate. Like I said before, calling this change not a retcon to me just feels like trying to cover up Gene's mistakes (I don't think that's what you are doing, I mean in general).
He got the Story By credit for "Turnabout Intruder."Well, if his son's documentary is any indication, Gene wasn't even working on the show during S3 anyway and just collecting paychecks.
Oh well. lolHe got the Story By credit for "Turnabout Intruder."
Seems he wrote the outline in April of '68.
I'm kind of worried about the Battlefield Earth levels of Dutch angles.
South Korean Netflix trailer:
https://twitter.com/0101je/status/865018670761693185
Sort of confirms thatBurnham is part Vulcan.
He was kinda a gross dude in a lot of ways.Oh well. lol
Besides, I think any mythology around Gene has been dispelled once you read about his constant womanizing and infidelity. I actually admire his son for addressing that, even though it's clear it was a subject Barrett didn't want to talk about.
She says "Your world of starship captains doesn't admit women."
Yes, the new series should ignore that. But it's pretty clear what the intention was.
He was kinda a gross dude in a lot of ways.
Eh, I think it goes beyond just that a bit. He essentially stole royalties from Alexander Courage, for example.He dreamed a much better future while still being shackled to the failings of the present. In that respect he's like a whole lot of artists.
Also, he really had that "we're evolved humans, we've moved past monogamy" slimy dude things going on. He'd fit right in with some people these days
Meh, not optimistic. Looks too much like JJ trek.
Meh, not optimistic. Looks too much like JJ trek.
Will watch it anywhere except CBS All-Access.
Sonequa Martin-Green was incredibly underrated in The Walking Dead.
Oh goddammit "lol lensflare lol" is back isn't it.
ugh
I know a friend who's starring in this show. There will definitely be explosions and battle-scarred folks in this.
Wait
I thought the ship in the teaser was the Discovery with an improved design.
USS Shenzhou? Did they really release an entire trailer for Star Trek Discovery without a single shot of the Discovery?
Dudes come on.
It feels like they're trying to find a way to bridge the Enterprise designs with the TOS designs.looks really neat - i'm not sure i'm a fan of those very dark aesthetics of the bridge. We're gonna spend a lot of time looking at that set, i guess, so i'd love it to look pleasing.
I still find it funny how Starfleet basically changes uniforms every decade though.
It feels like they're trying to find a way to bridge the Enterprise designs with the TOS designs.
I still find it funny how Starfleet basically changes uniforms every decade though. Does the US Military do that? lol