Senua
Member
And a mid-range/high end PC is an impressive leap over both of them. What else is new.
Shh don't ruin it for them.
And a mid-range/high end PC is an impressive leap over both of them. What else is new.
then a lot of people got bamboozled into buying 4 MS consoles in a 5 year span
this is ResetGaf. Aka Shitpost city, who cares
It's true, X version contains 2.25x the pixels I believe.
It's pretty much how I expect it's going to be for Sony marketed 3rd party games for the rest of the generation. I'm particularly looking forward to Red Dead Redemption 2.
Is this true? Even though Sony PlayStation has paid marketing rights for Star Wars Battlefront 2 , Xbox One X gets the better version?
Then X owners will feel cheated. Premium console that is as expensive as the next version only good for two years? Unless Sony waits so MS cant get the upper hand again.
If you're buying consoles for power you're doing it wrong. It's about true exclusives and X1 still has none.
If you're buying consoles for power you're doing it wrong. It's about true exclusives and X1 still has none.
Wonder how cheated pro users feel? They barely got a year being most powerful before X1X stomped all over it.
Then X owners will feel cheated. Premium console that is as expensive as the next version only good for two years? Unless Sony waits so MS cant get the upper hand again.
Do iPhone 7 purchasers feel cheated that an iPhone 8 and iPhone X launched this year that are both faster with better battery life?
Nope.
Then why would console owners? Yes, historically, consoles have only released every 6 to 8 years, but that doesn't mean that they can't release faster if you have rock solid back compat and provide other enhancements to older games on top of that.
This feels like a complete copy paste of the blocked Battlefront 2 Digital Foundry thread. Is this basically what Gaf has been reduced to?
Shh don't ruin it for them.
Not a single goddamn fk is given anything PC.the bumness will NEVER change, it only got worse..for the millionth time why would you bring PC (feel left out and not important? ) to a console forum where console gamers would not go anywhere near PC.. eww.. Should be stickied and locked first page on the forum.
Wonder how cheated pro users feel? They barely got a year being most powerful before X1X stomped all over it.
then a lot of people got bamboozled into buying 4 MS consoles in a 5 year span
this is ResetGaf. Aka Shitpost city, who cares
Do iPhone 7 purchasers feel cheated that an iPhone 8 and iPhone X launched this year that are both faster with better battery life?
Nope.
And a mid-range/high end PC is an impressive leap over both of them. What else is new.
Dynamic 4K you mean.What mid-rang pc can you build that can run BF2 4k 60fps and for how much? Please list parts
They should as they are essentially mainly helping Apple to keep their insane profit margins up, avoid spending money lowering production costs to be able to turn a profit while lowering costs, and buy into the hype and excitement of the NEW stuff (see iPhone X skyrocketing to $1,000 and still selling every unit they can make). In the world of apps not made by Apple, you will see not see a lot of developers having the time or resources or willingness to optimise for the new hotness until the userbase grows very strong and you will try to do it in your ever growing codebase in a way that does not hurt other device classes or make your code an unmaintainable mess of very fast spaghetti code.
There is nothing wrong with the concept of 5-7 years console generations (even less so now that we have the possibility of mid generation Pro/X refreshes to smooth out the edges) that are BC with previous consoles software. It is good to allow games to have an incentive to focus on new HW and for some rules to be reset.
Of course, if you want to think purely from a console HW profit margins point of view (and want to risk the "just copy Apple, of course it will be successful for you too" card) and you see nothing wrong with AAA publishers becoming bigger and bigger and merging/consolidating into mega AAAA ones then sure, who are console generations helping...
Until we have a Quantum Computing for the masses breakthrough, advancements in computing are slowing down (it takes longer and loger to double performance to put it simply) and costing more and more to achieve (see the transition from 90nm to 45nm and now from 16nm to 7nm and further... look at the already high cost of migrating to 300mm wafers and now to even bigger ones).
Technology tells you clearly "releasing new HW more and more frequently does not make practical sense for a performance point of view" and yet some customers angrily yell for manufacturers to make new HW and then they buy it... but again, just because Apple does it, it does not mean that it works for everyone else... A lot of companies have the "if it works for Apple it must work for us too..." mentality and it is dangerous.
It's been a looong hard 4yrs for certain people too 😉You can taste the massive salt, it's incredible.
We go entire gens where games sometimes don't even run a stable 30fps and more often then not never hit 60fps; where the most graphically intensive games drop frames and every DF video shows this (I'm speaking about consoles obviously); where even all those big name Sony exclusives drop frames and its rare to see a stable fps unless locked at 30 and not too amszing graphically (Destiny), but having 2.5times the graphical prowess/pixel count than PS4Pro is "not so impressive" because sometimes the frame rate drops 1FPS from 60>59?
Gonna be a long, hard 3 years for certain people, that's for sure.
Dynamic 4K you mean.
Still dynamic. We have to stay accurate here. Also you have to be specific at what settings the 1X is playing it at compared to the PC you want him to theoretically build. These things matter when youre talking about cost and build of a PC.1800p-2160p. Majority at 2160p
It's been a looong hard 4yrs for certain people too 😉
Do we even have mods anymore?
True ive made the comment a few times 😊 i just find the ignorance for the last 4yrs pretty funny when people who said theres no difference between xboxone & PS4 for 4yrs are now "even" saying how bad xboxone looks NOW but nah not hurting i got me pro don't play alotta games & only have 1080p TV also not big on multiplats (really regret buying D2) havent bought a cod since start of gen (except remastered cod4) plus i do have a powefull pc if i ever want to play a racing gameThis is not the first time you made this comment. You hurting now bro?
Thankfully you can.I have to say, it looked like ass on my Pro in the beta, looked less than 1080p (though I was wrong, same with I thought the Batman game was 900p, that looked blurry/soft too). Can you turn off the shitty effects like CA and stuff?
Though with this type of game the massive pixel difference between 1440p and 4k doesn't make that much of a difference because there's not a lot of jaggies, same with CoD WWII (though obviously the pixel count difference is huge). The extra effects and stuff are very welcome.
I don't believe so, no.
Thankfully you can.
I also had the same issue with the beta on my PS4 Pro, but I've seen the final game and it's much improved.
I'd say that's a smart idea. I'm personally really enjoying the game, but because of the grind I can't recommend someone picking it up right away unless they're a huge Star Wars fan, especially since they've already said it's going to be discounted during the weekend The Last Jedi is out.Ooh nice, it's like BF1? You can finally turn that shit off on that, thank God, looks so much better without it. No idea why they would add that crap.
Though to be honest with EAs recent stuff, I think I can wait until this game drops a lot in price before picking it up if at all.
I'd say that's a smart idea. I'm personally really enjoying the game, but because of the grind I can't recommend someone picking it up right away unless they're a huge Star Wars fan, especially since they've already said it's going to be discounted during the weekend The Last Jedi is out.
It's been a looong hard 4yrs for certain people too 😉
STFU with these comments, it's hardly any different than it used to be.
STFU with these comments, it's hardly any different than it used to be.
Nah i can wait 😊Going to be an even longer 2 to 3 years before we see another console....
Then X owners will feel cheated. Premium console that is as expensive as the next version only good for two years? Unless Sony waits so MS cant get the upper hand again.
Han Solo RIP
The difference is that tech wise the Xbox One X has the lead.
Did PS3 owners feel cheated when PS4 launched? Unless PS5 launches in 2019, no one should have an issue, except for maybe pro owners who might feel cheated for buying the Pro and PS5 launching shortly after lol, it's a double edge sword.
The difference is that tech wise the Xbox One X has the lead.
then a lot of people got bamboozled into buying 4 MS consoles in a 5 year span
I'd say that's a smart idea. I'm personally really enjoying the game, but because of the grind I can't recommend someone picking it up right away unless they're a huge Star Wars fan, especially since they've already said it's going to be discounted during the weekend The Last Jedi is out.
Dude BEAST gfx look at it.Fuck this shit. It looks awesome on both consoles. This magnifying bullshit needs to stop.
Some extra pixels does not make a game an "impressive leap". If X would have double the framerate and al kind of extra effects en lighting, that would be an "impressive leap".
Still dynamic. We have to stay accurate here. Also you have to be specific at what settings the 1X is playing it at compared to the PC you want him to theoretically build. These things matter when youre talking about cost and build of a PC.
Fuck this shit. It looks awesome on both consoles. This magnifying bullshit needs to stop.
Some extra pixels does not make a game an "impressive leap". If X would have double the framerate and al kind of extra effects en lighting, that would be an "impressive leap".