lol where did this "twice as fast" garbage come from?
Didn't say they were scared lol. iPad Pro is a Surface clone, simple as that.
think someone said they compared it to a 2012 regular macbook pro
lol where did this "twice as fast" garbage come from?
So basically it's worthless PR talk, there are discrete GPU's worse than Intel's current line-up. At least when Apple has performance comparisons they actually footnote what they used for their claims. Microsoft can't even provide specifics on the parts they are using.It was said by Panos Panay during the conference. "By adding the discrete GPU, two extra processors, it fundamentally makes Surface Book two times faster than the MacBook Pro".
Well, the GPU being in the Keyboard opens lots of possibilities. Imagine upgrading the GPU while keeping the display and CPU!
+Windows
So basically it's worthless PR talk, there are discrete GPU's worse than Intel's current line-up. At least when Apple has performance comparisons they actually footnote what they used for their claims. Microsoft can't even provide specifics on the parts they are using.
MS chat support saying gpu is 960M. Optimized by xbox team.
I'd be excited to see a similarly priced Thinkpad variant.I imagine by next year we'll see Lenovo, HP, and the others coming out with some similar products but maybe with lower prices. The same thing happened with the Surface tablets.
Lol
"the one with the GPU"... they all have GPU's.
Still not very important, no official information and it'll probably be throttled considering there's nothing other than the chassis to disperse heat.Well until it comes out and actual benchmarks can be run, I guess so. If it makes any difference to you the dGPU is probably the GTX 950m.
Edit:
Or maybe it's better than that
Bro... they all have GPU's.The one with the gpu starts at $1,900.
The one without the dedicated card has it's g processing embeded into the mobo/cpu (not entirely sure) and it uses part of your ram as vram.
No, the models that have a discrete GPU (the main advantage over the Pro) start at the $1900 model.Still not very important, no official information and it'll probably be throttled considering there's nothing other than the chassis to disperse heat.
Bro... they all have GPU's.
Integrated GPU's are still GPU's holy shitNo, the models that have a discrete GPU (the main advantage over the Pro) start at the $1900 model.
....Integrated GPU's are still GPU's holy shit
Integrated GPU's are still GPU's holy shit
It's called context.
Stop being pedantic, bro.
Yeah bro, it's all about context. The first post I quoted said "the one with the GPU", they all have GPU's. It's not about being pedantic, it's about making sure people that may have little grasp on how technology functions don't go around spreading mis-information they heard on here.....
No one is saying it doesn't have a GPU holy shit. People are saying that Microsoft is boasting about the performance in this laptop and yet... The discrete GPU is only included in the $1900 model.
They are bragging about superior performance for something that costs significantly more.
The fact that they are hiding what kind of processor and graphics card is in this thing extra leads me to believe that the twice as fast line is a bunch of giant bulllshit.
Show me a 970 and a quad core in this thing and I'll believe you.
Current MacBook Pro lines at the 1500 model include this:
2.7GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
Turbo Boost up to 3.1GHz
8GB 1866MHz LPDDR3 memory
256GB PCIe-based flash storage1
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
So incredibly disingenuous statements that have little relevance?it's already been gone over several times, they're talking about the non-retina MBP that was last updated in 2012.
That's certainly not going to happen this go round.Show me a 970 and a quad core in this thing and I'll believe you
So incredibly disingenuous statements that have little relevance?
I mean whatever, the product looks solid, if not a little expensive. Also curious to see how on earth a battery could get 12 hours of battery life when running a discrete card, but I'm sure the tech sites will run their tests.
Ehhhhh for $1500 I'd just build a dang gaming PC. You can get a decent laptop for much less that'll do what you want from a portable perspective, e.g. run word processors etc. I've never understood the idea of a gaming laptop.
This is nice but too expensive for me. I'll buy one of the Chinese clones if they ever come out.
Do you know any good cheap Chinese clones of PC's?
Don't forget the stellar build quality! Those things are beatifully made, that's why they're being compared to the MacBook Pro.I'm not sure that it's fair to compare it spec for spec with a Macbook Pro and declare it unreasonably priced. As I mentioned before, there's no comparable device - considering I can't think of many Macbook Pro like devices that are touch screen, double as a tablet and have a stylus.
OMG you're right. They're exactly the same LOL.
Only difference is the Apple logo. /s
You're telling me that during that whole press conference no one from the media that got to handle the device went into system properties and looked at what processor it was packing?
Comparing this to my current MBP 13"
+Touch screen
+Dedicated GPU
+More/similar battery life
+Higher resolution screen
+Better Steam compatibility
+Runs my work software
+Similar price
Its a no brainer to switch.
And the class of operating system. It'd make an interesting case with OS X, but IOS is garbage for that price and screen size.
Have you used one? Its night and day. I would never buy a laptop without a touchscreen nowadays.I don't really want a touchscreen on my laptop.
MS chat support saying gpu is 960M. Optimized by xbox team.
I call bs on that. 960m needs active cooling.
I call bs on that. 960m needs active cooling.
Ehhhhh for $1500 I'd just build a dang gaming PC. You can get a decent laptop for much less that'll do what you want from a portable perspective, e.g. run word processors etc. I've never understood the idea of a gaming laptop.