hey_it's_that_dog
benevolent sexism
Maybe they should've let Bluepoint handle this.
Yes I'm sure they would have remade the entire game from top to bottom in a year. More like Lazy Dog, amirite?
Maybe they should've let Bluepoint handle this.
I think I just hoped for something in line with the Tomb Raider remaster
We don't need this level headed crap here. I am concerned for this port.Perhaps due to miscommunication from Sony and Naughty Dog, or simply unfounded expectations from fans and the NAUGHTY GODS GRAPHICS chorus sung (I don't know which as I haven't followed PR around this game closely), there does appear to be a misunderstanding as to what the TLoU Remaster is and what it isn't. It's a port, a last generation game, spruced up in framerate, texture quality, and overall rendering IQ (eg: shadows) on more modern hardware. It's not a remake or reimagining, and not an overhaul in technology. Maybe distinctly cross generation games like Ground Zeroes, Destiny, Battlefield, and all that have given folk the false impression that Naughty Dog was going to deliver a game that was clearly technologically leaps and bounds over the PS3 build despite its last generation origins. Fact of the matter is The Last of Us is not a PlayStation 4 game, and the technology built into the engine was not for PlayStation 4 hardware. The Last of Us is, through and through, in almost every respect, a game made for the PlayStation 3. And here it is ported, running at a higher resolution, better framerate, and with cleaner textures.
The difference is, in my opinion, huge. But I come from a culture of PC gaming where resolution increases and better texture filtering go a long, long way to improve a game's image quality and presentation. The Last of Us is a gorgeous game, but these screenshots even in their compressed .jpg glory show a pretty fucking obvious leap in clarity and image quality. It's sharper, finer, more detailed, and overall in my opinion significantly more pleasing on the eye.
But it's still The Last of Us. That's what you're paying for: The Last of Us 1920x1080. Not The Last of Us: Remake.
EDIT: Pre-rendered cutscenes probably aren't the best example. There should be an increase in clarity going from 720p to 1080p cutscenes, but the assets themselves are still fundamentally the same and not rendered in real time.
It's an absolutely valid comparison. You will not get supersampled-level IQ in this game like those PR screens showed, end of story.
I guess I can see why they aren't exactly showing it off.
PS4-PS3 (PS3 are png)
that first screen lol, here is a better one
PS3
PS4
Can you upscale the PS3 shots to 1080p to make it an easier comparison?
are these from the screenshot function?
Why do people keep bringing this up? I don't get what people find more impressive about TR than this. These shots are also from the worst looking parts of the game.
For sure.
And It's just such a shame ND decided for no reason to not use their superdupermagical anti-aliasing technology demonstrated in UC4 on TLOU:R.
Two more
Is upscaling a still image in photoshop or whatever the same quality of upscaling that happens in realtime between the TV and/or console? This is a not a rhetorical question; I am curious.
Hmmm not the ideal way to show off your game huh? Serves Sony/ ND right for waiting this long to get some media out there.
Now that the game is in the wild, we will get some low res pics and video's for us all to bitch over. Nice job to come up with this brilliant marketing tactic.
I don't know what people were expecting. Uncharted 4 trailer like quality? Looks good enough to me.
I don't know what people were expecting. Uncharted 4 trailer like quality? Looks good enough to me.
I don't know what people were expecting. Uncharted 4 trailer like quality? Looks good enough to me.
Remaster (and its derivations, frequently found in the phrases digitally remastered or digital remastering) refers to quality enhancement of sound and/or picture to a previously existing recording.
I don't know what people were expecting. Uncharted 4 trailer like quality?
There's hardly any except on some window sills and computer monitors (and that one really bad shot inside the truck). IQ is much better than I expected.Personally, no jaggies would have sufficed. I'm more interested in framerates than IQ, but jaggies kill me. Especially given the circumstances.
It doesn't look as good as I expected. At least it runs at 60 fps.
There was one guy in another thread a while back who was.
Hmmm not the ideal way to show off your game huh? Serves Sony/ ND right for waiting this long to get some media out there.
Now that the game is in the wild, we will get some low res pics and video's for us all to bitch over. Nice job to come up with this brilliant marketing tactic.
Well he isn't entirely wrong. When you keep stuff under wraps for so long the chance that media gets leaked under sub optimal conditions increases.geeez, at the bolded
Doesn't look like as big of an upgrade as TRE, which is a shame. Still pre-ordered it tho, can't wait.
Well he isn't entirely wrong. When you keep stuff under wraps for so long the chance that media gets leaked under sub optimal conditions increases.
Game is going to look gorgeous hot damn.
Jett has to be trolling.
Right?
Thanks for the comparison man. I fail to see how the ps4 is using the superior cutscene character models when they look exactly the same?