KTallguy said:How is the story, acting, cutscenes, etc?
KTallguy said:Well they've been advertising the fuck out of this game in Japan in every store I go, so I hope and pray that even if the story is shit, it's at least told in an intelligent way.
But man, Rogue Galaxy
KTallguy said:Well they've been advertising the fuck out of this game in Japan in every store I go, so I hope and pray that even if the story is shit, it's at least told in an intelligent way.
But man, Rogue Galaxy
AndyD said:Rogue Galaxy wasn't bad, it just wasn't fantastic.
I think this may turn out quite good. It will likely be a great easy/casual RPG, much like RG and Dark Cloud series, and not the tough RPGs like FF series.
DarknessTear said:Tough? What?
Fuck you dude. Valkyria Chronicles is awesome.Yazus said:Edit: i dont like the other ps3 rpgs that are actually realased exclusively to the ps3 (i have a 360 and all those games).
Yazus said:Fuck it, i HAVE to get a PS3 soon.
White Knight Chronicles, Versus XIII... too few reasons to actually buy a PS3 for a JRPG fan like me. I hope that Team ICO nex project is going to be on PS3 so i'll have a reason to instant-buy it
Edit: i dont like the other ps3 rpgs that are actually realased exclusively to the ps3 (i have a 360 and all those games).
I hope Square/tri-Ace/Level-5 and other good JRPG devs relase some new jrpg on that console.
kay said:7877
DMPrince said:Real score? If so then LMFAO!!!!
DMPrince said:Real score? If so then LMFAO!!!!
Looks like it will become the top selling HD RPG in Japan, if preorders aren't suddenly all cancelled that is. :lolI think this'll do great in sales.
Kagari said:Yeah, Valkyria is amazing. Probably better than most of the Japanese games release this generation so far...
jett said:I never had any hope for this game after real gameplay footage emerged.
Bunch of sheep. BUNCH OF SHEEP. YEAH, YOU WALK OFF THAT CLIFF. DIEEEEStrider2K99 said:Here come the Debby Downers after one Famitsu score. :lol
starblade said:This game is really shaping up to be the first game I might import. If the Famitsu review manages to be above 35 (which doesn't seem hard for an rpg to pull off) and I'm not reeling after Christmas, then I'm pretty sure I'm going to take the plunge.
However as much as I love Level 5, everything about this game appears...bland. That's just the palpable feeling I get from every trailer I see and every screenshot. Level 5 has never truly dropped the ball however (even with Rogue Galaxy) and I doubt a game they have poured so much production time and resources into will turn out less than stellar.
Buy Valkyria Chronicles. If you're RPG starving,you should have known about this game.starblade said:Looks like my worst fears were realized according to famitsu. As rpg starved as I am right now on the PS3, I also know when to not needlessly waste money. I'll wait for first-hand impressions and maybe buy the domestic release.
Loudninja said:Really its , famitsu I am not really sure why people wait for their scores.
Lightning said:I'll wait for Western reviews before judging whether Level 5 have failed or not.
gregor7777 said:Well, what other JRPGs got such a low score recently? With which games does it share company?
I don't recall any big budget JRPG getting such a low score from them.
Shame really, this one could have gone either way. One thing I think it won't be is 'middle of the road'.
For a JRPG? Lightning, have you lost your mind tonight? Between this and LR since when did you put some much faith in the Western gaming media for JRPG reviews? :lol
Loudninja said:Do you see all the negative mention in the review?
gregor7777 said:Wasn't much at all to go by really. Although a Japanese reviewer calling the combat 'simplistic' is not a good thing.
gregor7777 said:Wasn't much at all to go by really. Although a Japanese reviewer calling the combat 'simplistic' is not a good thing.
I don't have that much faith in the western ones but they are all we have. One can't deny that Famitsu are extremely suspect with their scores. It is next to impossible to tell which games they genuinely rate and which games get token scores because of backstage deals.gregor7777 said:For a JRPG? Lightning, have you lost your mind tonight? Between this and LR since when did you put some much faith in the Western gaming media for JRPG reviews? :lol
Lightning said:The thing I trust the most are user reviews, they should hopefully flow through after the game releases.
Loudninja said:All those RPGS that got high scores were basically the same formula.
Aslo the review mention the game about 30 hours to complete.
Boulayman said:Well, since they reviewed quite recently The last Remnant which involved a quite complex combat system, they may have gotten their standards wrong.
I do feel that the score is quite low when compared to what they had to say about it (Kinda reminds me of the score dynamic The Last remnant got form western reviewers).
For now, I'll interpret simplistic as meaning traditional rpg combat and I, for one, think it's a plus.
gregor7777 said:Sorry to keep bringing up LR, but I wanted to point out an inconsistency in your posts.
In another thread, I called you out about saying LR was a bad game even though you haven't played it. You said, to paraphrase, that it wasn't getting positive feedback or something to that effect so you'd never play it.
Now in the Western media, the game got killed. But user impressions, particularly here on GAF which you've pointed out numerous times you trust over the gaming media, impressions have been overwhelmingly positive.
What gives? I think I know, but I'd like to hear you say it once and for all.
Say what? Which game recently does LR compare to? It's battle mechanics are non-typical to put it mildly.
I promise for the good of the thread this will be my last LR post
gregor7777 said:Sorry to keep bringing up LR, but I wanted to point out an inconsistency in your posts.
In another thread, I called you out about saying LR was a bad game even though you haven't played it. You said, to paraphrase, that it wasn't getting positive feedback or something to that effect so you'd never play it.
Now in the Western media, the game got killed. But user impressions, particularly here on GAF which you've pointed out numerous times you trust over the gaming media, impressions have been overwhelmingly positive.
What gives? I think I know, but I'd like to hear you say it once and for all.
Say what? Which game recently does LR compare to? It's battle mechanics are non-typical to put it mildly.
I promise for the good of the thread this will be my last LR post
I could buy into this. We'll see when GAF gets it's grubby hands on it.
AndyD said:I am not sure what your guys beef is, but if you mean TLR, it seems the GAF impressions are that its a very buggy game and generally just average... At least that's what I got out of reading around here.
Loudninja said:I was not talking about LR :lol
gregor7777 said:Check out the official thread. Pretty positive impressions there from the people who've actually played a game I won't mention. The game I won't mention won't get any positive feedback in Sony hives I'm sure, given it's release status.
It's a let down in a technical sense, in more than one way, but it doesn't affect the gameplay in the least. Particularly if it's installed. Dramatic improvement, which PS3 owners will see obviously.
Ah, sorry. Lightning was and when you commented on the high scores from Famitsu I assumed becaus o f the score they gave it compared to western scores.