PC it is then.. when the price drops a bit. Thanks.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Titanfall 360 - Gameplay Video.
- Thread starter Miles Quaritch
- Start date
PC it is then.. when the price drops a bit. Thanks.
Canis lupus
Member
It looks really bad, it has no colors, reminds me of cross gen games of 2005-2006.
The more I watch the worse it gets. Where did all the effects go? Pilot models look pretty bad too.
EDIT:
Ok honeslty guys those of you saying it looks close do you have an X1? Have you played this on a proper display? The game is obviously lesser looking in all ways. Its what I would expect from taking a source game and going from max to minimum settings.
EDIT:
Ok honeslty guys those of you saying it looks close do you have an X1? Have you played this on a proper display? The game is obviously lesser looking in all ways. Its what I would expect from taking a source game and going from max to minimum settings.
Kind of agree. The game looked fine during the tutorial but my opinion quickly changed when seeing footage of an actual match.
But again, it's on the 360 -- a basically 10 year old console. Shouldn't be surprising.
I think it's a bit hypocritical to say that's it's "pretty much the same" as the XB1 version when we thoroughly analyze every difference between PS4/XB1 multiplats. I'll agree on the fact that it's not a $500, generational-leap difference though, but that's more due to the fact that the XB1 version isn't very optimized either.
VisceralBowl
Member
They implemented texture streaming methinks.
How do I know?
The second gameplay vid (offscreen) has better textures
The comparison pic posted above has blurry smudge at the same point.
Good to know I guess.
How do I know?
The second gameplay vid (offscreen) has better textures
The comparison pic posted above has blurry smudge at the same point.
Good to know I guess.
Yeah, with the effects missing it seems really sterile and clean. I think the effects add a lot to the overall aesthetic and chaos that the XB1/PC game pulls off so well.
Conkerkid11
Member
I don't know if it's just the Twitch upload or not, but the framerate looks pretty bad coupled with the screen tearing.
If the screen tearing is just because it's a bad upload, then I understand why they delayed this version. It looks and plays similarly to the Xbox One version. I don't know why anybody's surprised though. Titanfall was never supposed to push consoles to their limit. I thought everybody was excited about its gameplay.
Edit: Or does the Xbox One version have this much screen tearing as well? I don't understand how console gamers can tolerate that. When I'm choosing whether to play it at 60 fps and stuttering like hell on PC or with an unlocked framerate and screen tearing, I choose stuttering like hell.
If the screen tearing is just because it's a bad upload, then I understand why they delayed this version. It looks and plays similarly to the Xbox One version. I don't know why anybody's surprised though. Titanfall was never supposed to push consoles to their limit. I thought everybody was excited about its gameplay.
Edit: Or does the Xbox One version have this much screen tearing as well? I don't understand how console gamers can tolerate that. When I'm choosing whether to play it at 60 fps and stuttering like hell on PC or with an unlocked framerate and screen tearing, I choose stuttering like hell.
Eh, kinda. It's a well done port for sure but man it looks super muddy at times with a worse framerate. All that is expected considering it's on 9 year old hardware, I'm kind of excited to see DF's breakdown of the game.
Exploratory
Banned
30 fps is suddenly the same experience as 60 fps?
It looks a lot worse than the X1 version, no doubt it will not run as nice not being 60fps. Given the amount people that usually go on about IQ, FPS and res when the X1 and PS4 are compared I am surprised so many of you are all sweet with this.
If you are really into this type of game you will definitely want it on the PC or X1 for 60fps, isn't that worth a new console (or PC)?
If you are really into this type of game you will definitely want it on the PC or X1 for 60fps, isn't that worth a new console (or PC)?
Surface of Me
I'm not an NPC. And neither are we.
Only if it isn't a X1/PS4 comparison.
REMEMBER CITADEL
Banned
My thoughts exactly. Incomparably smaller differences between Xbox One and PS4 versions are often labeled as "huge".
That said, it looks decent for a 360 game, and if it plays as well as the other versions, people are in for a good time.
RedAssedApe
Banned
looks really bland :\
Miles Quaritch
Member
Don't go down this road, it won't end well...
The Cartographer
Member
Is Titanfall Xbone 60 fps?
You're wasting your time lol.
Thats because its a cross gen game. It certainly a bigger difference then cod ghosts and about on par with BF4. The difference is very noticeable even casuals will notice it and rather play the X1/PC version.
The XB1 version has the most screen tearing I've seen in a while, but the 360 footage seems worse. I'm guessing the 30fps lock would help with that.
I disagree that this isn't worth buying an x1 over. If you like this game you WILL enjoy it more on PC or X1. The graphics im seeing here gimp the experience. It is not the same. Things feel flat and gives the effect of not really being there in the fight. That's what titanfall does so well on x1 and pc. The effects add grit and feeling. I wouldn't play this on 360 but that's why I sold that console a few years back.
I went into this thread expecting meltdowngradatonhatefests, but it looks... decent. Not great, but what do you expect from a next-gen downport.
Nobody in the Call of Duty crowd will have problems about it looking the way it does at the moment, so all in all I'm just left wondering why they didn't show any footage earlier.
Nobody in the Call of Duty crowd will have problems about it looking the way it does at the moment, so all in all I'm just left wondering why they didn't show any footage earlier.
That stuff really only matters when its the same gen. [His original comment is still stupid though]
It looks alright, just like COD, but I can tell where they cut back.
The problem here is that the XB1 version isn't too great either in terms of performance. Lots of screen tearing and no stable 60 fps either. I couldn't really recommend a friend with a 360 to buy an XB1 + Titanfall for the "definitive experience" because it still has problems.
It's not just graphics though. The on foot gameplay based on the video is very slow/choppy and not just when there's a lot of action on the screen (i.e.: multiple titans).
Iacobellis
Junior Member
To make matters worse, the 360 has been out for eight years.
Performance on Xbox One with multiple Titans isn't great either. This is "good enough" for the 360.
Yeah, the PC version is the same, tearing everywhere for some reason. I think that is actually some kind of bug that will be fixed.
Once that is fixed the X1 will still be much better than this simply for 60fps (I only get dips when more than 2 titans are on screen).
This is going to be when there is a lot of titans on screen, and if this makes the X1 shit itself imagine what ti will do to the 360 already trying to hit 30fps....
Don't even try with that guy
ChosenPredator
Banned
Yeah the 360 versions foot/titan play is terrible
Never said it was. I said it was expected on the 360 due to it not being that good on the Xbox One.
My post mentioned on foot gameplay while in a match and there's definitely a difference between the two versions -- at least based on the video.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
It looks bland on PC and XB as well. It seems like it's missing some good AF. Otherwise it doesn't look as bad as some say. Respectably close to the XB version.
All those saying it looks close to the X1 version need your eyes checked. Its choppy as fuck and missing loads of effects. In this case it seems MS made the right choice. The less seen of this version the better. Without the extra grunt to power past the poor engine(it isn't source anymore) the game is clearly struggling.
You're nothing if not consistent. Really starting to approach a full-time job here.
On topic: Looks quite good for a XB360 game, though it seems to lack some of the effects you see on the XB1/PC version. Will need to wait for DF report though.
CassidyIzABeast
Member
Visually I expected worse but the framerate looks choppy as hell and this is only the tutorial.
Of course there is a difference, it's an 8 year old console versus a brand new one. And there is a difference between those two and PC as well, which varies depending on the setup.
The end of the video shows the first Campaign mission on Fracture.
BouncyFrag
Member
Redbox it is then. I've never been able to get into fps multiplayer but will give this a go as I've heard its accessible for noobs like me.
A lot of the texturework is pretty nasty in comparison to the XB1 version, and the framerate clearly isn't there, but still, if you've only got a 360 to play this on, you're probably going to be pretty happy with how it looks and plays.
AFAIK, the XB1/360/PC versions all use Azure.
AFAIK, the XB1/360/PC versions all use Azure.
I'm willing to bet a ton of that in the vid was lag. You can see it get choppy as heck at the end before the server disconnects.
Does the 360 version use EA servers or the same MS servers as the XB1 version?