Looks very good considering the specs of the 360.
You mean like on the front of the box with a large icon saying "Hard Drive Required" ?
I don't think your average user knows the difference between a flash drive and hard drive tbh. Most will expect this to work without any additional hardware add-ons out of the box.
It does also state that a HD is required on the back of box but its one of these asterick/fine print things. I personally wouldn't make a fuss about this...but I could see parents buying this for their kids getting upset. :\
They should probably have a flashing sign on the front that says this won't work on a GameCube too.
With a QR code link to an instructional video explaining how a GameCube and Xbox 360 are different.
but then you'd need some kind of clear messaging that stopped users mistaking the QR code for a magic eye picture.....
I see a lot of people other places (read: Twitter) saying how ugly it looks in comparison to the PC / Xbox One version, as if they are surprised. Nearly 9 year old hardware vs brand new hardware and technology, and the new is substantially better? *gasp*
Dude, I can't believe the Atari 2600 version of Donkey Kong doesn't look like Donkey Kong Country. BULLSHIT!
The resolution (but resolution doesn't matter to XB1 people, remember?), the frame rate (but the frame rate fluctuates so much on XB1 that the locked 30 without horrible screen tearing might be an improvement), and the texture and lighting quality.
Console war generalizations.
The Digital Foundry analysis of Titanfall on XB1 stated the "image quality punches above it's weight" at 792p. Resolution numbers don't tell the whole story. MSAA makes a big difference. The first time I saw the beta on my tv I was quite surprised at how clean it looked at that res. It was dramatically better looking than Ghosts on XB1.
I think the Xbox One version only looks this way; as the cloud hasn't kicked in yet.
Console war generalizations.
The Digital Foundry analysis of Titanfall on XB1 stated the "image quality punches above it's weight" at 792p. Resolution numbers don't tell the whole story. MSAA makes a big difference. The first time I saw the beta on my tv I was quite surprised at how clean it looked at that res. It was dramatically better looking than Ghosts on XB1.
Ah, I didn't see that it was stated on the cover...btw is that the US case? Cause those "icons" are atrocious...
Uhhh, somebody already did, check out the previous pagesThat is the USA cover in pic above it's only missing another banner stating Winner of over 75 awards. Will post pics shortly.
Uhhh, somebody already did, check out the previous pages
Wow, Bluepoint did a killer job totally preserving the Titanfall experience on the Xbox 360. That's...seriously amazing.
Not really, the egregious screen tearing that is the hallmark of the Xbone version is missing.
So do you need a hard drive to play or not?
Not really, the egregious screen tearing that is the hallmark of the Xbone version is missing.
You do. There's a cat on YT who tried to play it on his 4GB Slim and it wouldn't work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbTHH8QPDco