BruiserBear
Banned
Digital Foundry articles are going to be interesting next-gen.
Most definitely.
Do you honestly believe that MS will stop at paying devs?
Oh please.
Digital Foundry articles are going to be interesting next-gen.
Do you honestly believe that MS will stop at paying devs?
Xbone
From this:
to this:
?
Out-smarted by Sony, apparently.
For the peeps out there asserting that Microsoft might become enough of a market leader for this power discrepancy not to matter, and additionally, whom are making comparisons to the PS2.
Sony was already the market leader when they launched the PS2. Their only real competition in the previous generation was Nintendo, and sadly Nintendo made too many mistakes with the N64 to provide truly healthy competition to the PlayStation brand.
Microsoft, on the other hand, is only in third place globally, with the X-Box 360. The 360 has sold really well in America, but has sold fairly poorly everywhere else. This, despite the head start over the PS3, despite the price advantage over the PS3, and despite Sony's numerous mistakes with the PS3 launch and design.
Microsoft will not have any of those advantages this time, and does not currently have a marketshare that is analogous to the PlayStation 1 and 2. This is on top of the good will Microsoft has wasted these past few years, which has alienated much of the early adopters companies usually rely on to build up an install base early on.
This is not to say, that Microsoft cannot recover, but the situation is definitly not analogous to the PS2 launch. If Microsoft wants to bounce back, they'll have to utterly wow people with their launch line-up, and convince people that their products positives outweigh the negatives of its DRM.
In other words, Microsoft is likely to have a significantly harder time establishing a dominant market share in the United States, which will put them in a very difficult position globally.
Do you honestly believe that MS will stop at paying devs and publishers?
I miss Allard.
Do you honestly believe that MS will stop at paying devs and publishers?
How are you arriving at that? Even if this did have a direct correlation to framerates, you're talking 4X the performance right there. Not the 2X being discussed here.
So.... I can't fix this one by wrapping it in a towel?
Out-smarted by Sony, apparently.
What's that going to do though? Information these days does not just flow from gaming press. I mean look at all the leaks that have been occurring this year about the next gen consoles. Microsoft can throw money around all they want, the truth still finds a way. The internet has too many holes to plug with dollars.
Won't find this info from the gaming press.
Do you honestly believe that MS will stop at paying devs and publishers?
probably in NA again, I hear NFL is big in those parts
For North America, I still think they'll take the lead in initial sales. Most people are just going to be looking for games period and getting things like the NFL hook-up only ensure MS intends to keep the mindshare.
Every single quote there was speculation and educated guesses that anyone could have typed from scouring B3D or even here. Barely any specifics. You even linked a quote where you bolded where you said "it will have 8gb of ram"... in a thread about the same subject, and then used that post in your compilation. You don't have any sources. Even in this thread all you did was ape Thuway's rumor. "Yeah, my sources tell me the same"... durrr. And I'm not personally attacking you. Stop trying to spin this into a "personal attack" in an attempt to get someone in trouble. It's called questioning your already dubious credibility, which is perfectly fine to do in a medium like this.
So.... I can't fix this one by wrapping it in a towel?
MS tried to use ESRAM to fix the low bandwidth of DDR3 to avoid the price of using GDDR5 & it only got them stuck in a technical shit storm that will only get worse as they try to get out of it.
3rd, being slightly less than the PS3. That isn't bad at all considering how crappy their hardware is.
This sucks pretty bad. I never planned to buy an Xbox, I will fully support the playstation, but it sucks to think how this will affect multiplatforms games. It was already on edhe with 1.8 Tf vs 1.2. Now I'm thinking that game design will suffer from it and I don't mean something like lower resolution and effects. This is bad for all gamers no matter the platform of choice. I do not want the Xbox to be this weak even though I have no respect for Microsoft. I look at the bigger picture.
No, though most 3rd party publishers won't be blinded by money. MS also has their shareholders/investors to deal with, & they want Microsoft's gaming division to be profitable this time around, unlike with the OG Xbox & the Xbox 360.
Do you believe that MS will pay a dev/pub to make a game look worse on Playstation?
Sony ain't got shit to do with it.
Dumb decisions. That was it.
This is something mostly objective and testable. Its not like reviews.Do you honestly believe that MS will stop at paying devs and publishers?
That's not how they'll approach it, no. They'll insist on parity, which will mean developers dumbing down PS4 games.
Republicans created Fox News, that did okay for them...This is something mostly objective and testable. Its not like reviews.
If Digital Foundry starts coming up with inaccurate results/comparisons, then somebody WILL be along to discredit them very quickly. It just wouldn't work.
I thought the PSP was originally downclocked in a firmware update because of battery life?
Slightly less after having a one year head start and a lower MSRP all generation. Now we're talking about simultaneous launch or MS having to delay and both being built with similar silicon budgets (read: same bill of materials and likely same target MSRP for core model) and now MS is the one having fab problems, not Sony.
You can work around one big mistake, like shoddy hardware, or a crazy high initial MSRP, or a lack of system power. All three platforms last generation worked around one of these and used benefits in the other categories to do so. Microsoft might just go for the hat trick and be the most expensive, worst built, last to the party console.
Is crazy buttocks (jeezus) legit?...and not because he talks in code
But the information stays where MS want it to be. As long as their casual audience never sees it, it doesn't matter to them. The only people that suffer are those gamers who supported them for years and made them the success they are today in the gaming industry. They don't give a shit about us.
That's not how they'll approach it, no. They'll insist on parity, which will mean developers dumbing down PS4 games. Everyone will be held back by this if it takes hold, including PC gaming.
Not blinded by money?
That sounds unlikely.
Republicans created Fox News, that did okay for them...
Wow @ the Crazy Buttocks info. MS really digging themselves into a grave here, it seems. Halo 5 and 6 better be something spectacular.
For the peeps out there asserting that Microsoft might become enough of a market leader for this power discrepancy not to matter, and additionally, whom are making comparisons to the PS2.
Sony was already the market leader when they launched the PS2. Their only real competition in the previous generation was Nintendo, and sadly Nintendo made too many mistakes with the N64 to provide truly healthy competition to the PlayStation brand.
Microsoft, on the other hand, is only in third place globally, with the X-Box 360. The 360 has sold really well in America, but has sold fairly poorly everywhere else. This, despite the head start over the PS3, despite the price advantage over the PS3, and despite Sony's numerous mistakes with the PS3 launch and design.
Microsoft will not have any of those advantages this time, and does not currently have a marketshare that is analogous to the PlayStation 1 and 2. This is on top of the good will Microsoft has wasted these past few years, which has alienated much of the early adopters companies usually rely on to build up an install base early on.
This is not to say, that Microsoft cannot recover, but the situation is definitly not analogous to the PS2 launch. If Microsoft wants to bounce back, they'll have to utterly wow people with their launch line-up, and convince people that their products positives outweigh the negatives of its DRM.
In other words, Microsoft is likely to have a significantly harder time establishing a dominant market share in the United States, which will put them in a very difficult position globally.
ucan remo.ve RUMUR frmo hte thread tittle TEAMMOD. esram yieldls. are "troubling"toput it lightly.
truthfact.
btw youiw lil not njhear abouthing about tech atMS E3 presentation. tech tarbaby (notracistst!) IS TSTICKIER THAN YOU WIL EVER KNOW. I LOOK FORWARF TO READING THE BOOK BY VENTUREBEAT.
theyMSrushed. --caughtoutbysonychangs. leadershitfailure.p.
On cloudy days the XBone will be 10x more powerful than any other gaming platform so I don't see why this matter. MS could ship a black box with only an optical drive powered by teh clowd and it would still win
Not blinded by money?
That sounds unlikely.