You are assuming a whole lot.
The person says "can ypu please open your bag", you do, you are thanked, you leave.
It's not the dystopian hellhole you seem to imagine.
I am talking about having to open your bag as a routine thing at the checkout, not about what happened in the video.
In both cases, ID and bag opening, it's a minor inconvenience for everyone, one that helps the store because some individuals cannot be trusted.
i listen to this clip like once a month
In the U.S., selling alcohol to a minor will get the store fined up the ass and possibly the cashier arrested, so it makes sense why that is reasonable.Why do you try to go to some logical extreme?
Explain why checking ID is reasonable, and looking into a bag for 2 seconds isn't.
Oh, and to answer your two questions:
Yes. No.
Why do you try to go to some logical extreme?
Explain why checking ID is reasonable, and looking into a bag for 2 seconds isn't.
Oh, and to answer your two questions:
Yes. No.
Why do you have to check bag sizes? This sounds so strange to me coming from Germany. The only thing that shop does is make people feel like they are thieves so I am not surprised people act rude.
Teaching critical thinking skills isn't high on the curriculum in the US huh?
Hell, teaching common sense doesn't seem to be on their either...
Again, because they are potential criminals.
I don't see why checking bags in general is a problem.
Do you complain when someone on the train asks you for your ticket? When you are asked for ID when buying alcohol?
Why should the company blindly trust you?
The cringe in this thread is strong. Just seems like a really shitty mistake a kid made, he's trying to do his job.
I'm sorry about your situation but this has exactly zero to do with all this.
This is not in response to the video but to people who make our jobs miserable. I am a cashier at an independent supermarket. Part of my job is to check people's bags. Just for them to open it up so I can give it less than a second or attention if their bag is a certain size.
It is clearly signed at so many shops including mine that it is a condition of entry that you show your bags/receipts. And yet people act outraged, think I am accusing them of theft (no, it is my job to ask to check bags of a certain size), essentially tell me to profile people and not to check theirs (eg to only check school kids bags), or others accuse me of profiling, or a man abuse me for asking a woman to show her bag, saying that a woman should do it and glaring at me and yelling abuse at me. Or people saying they just stepped in a minute beforehand and didn't go near anything, as if I can be expected to keep track of every customer. Or people deny my request abusively. Or demanding that I get police to do it.
You know what I just do now? Not ask. Let my boss be displeased with me because I am sick of all the abuse that my conpletely polite requests got.
I didn't completely follow the exchange.
What happened between him showing her the $15 price (on the website?) which apparently supported him, and him acquiescing to the fact that he'd totally clowned himself?
What was the smoking gun for him? I couldn't make out his mumbles of contrition.
One is invasive, the other isn't. So...Why do you try to go to some logical extreme?
Explain why checking ID is reasonable, and looking into a bag for 2 seconds isn't.
Oh, and to answer your two questions:
Yes. No.
I would like the answer to this as well. Why did he concede he was wrong? The website supported him and she just said to ring it up. He didn't, so for all he knows she was doubling down on her bluff.
No, I don't think she stole anything. I'm just trying to understand what happened.
It has to do with posts about how people deal with bag checkers.
The idea is that it is silly to ask to check a small bag. If it can hold a loaf of bread is the general guide to go by. Though I assume not because bread is valuable but just that if it can contain a lot of things. It isn't vaguely airtight but it is probably a good general rule of thumb.
Most people don't act rude. Most people understand that checking bags isn't an allegation or even suspicion. It really isn't. I rarely think 'ooh this person might be stealing'. It is/was always 'that bag is of the size I should check, I will say these words and look'. Some people volunteer their bags (I do this!). It is just some people, but you really never know who and it can ruin a day.
Am I wrong in assuming this isn't asked in good faith? We could ban someone if they were a big issue for this and IIRC my supervisor called police on my first day for someone refusing to show their bag (who did not stop and kept walking briskly).
This is not in response to the video but to people who make our jobs miserable. I am a cashier at an independent supermarket. Part of my job is to check people's bags. Just for them to open it up so I can give it less than a second or attention if their bag is a certain size.
It is clearly signed at so many shops including mine that it is a condition of entry that you show your bags/receipts. And yet people act outraged, think I am accusing them of theft (no, it is my job to ask to check bags of a certain size), essentially tell me to profile people and not to check theirs (eg to only check school kids bags), or others accuse me of profiling, or a man abuse me for asking a woman to show her bag, saying that a woman should do it and glaring at me and yelling abuse at me. Or people saying they just stepped in a minute beforehand and didn't go near anything, as if I can be expected to keep track of every customer. Or people deny my request abusively. Or demanding that I get police to do it.
You know what I just do now? Not ask. Let my boss be displeased with me because I am sick of all the abuse that my conpletely polite requests got.
http://i.imgur.com/UwjVyeL.png
Sounds like the other guy found the clearance sticker right there at around 1:30 in the video
Lmao
Checking ID go buy alcohol is a legal requirement. Asking to see someone's bag or receipt for things hey have already purchased and legally belong to them is not.
How did you not get burned for kidnapping? What if you were wrong?
Why do you try to go to some logical extreme?
Explain why checking ID is reasonable, and looking into a bag for 2 seconds isn't.
Oh, and to answer your two questions:
Yes. No.
I can't believe it isn't here. How is this not false imprisonment? They aren't police and theres plenty of times police can't even detain you.
How did you not get burned for kidnapping? What if you were wrong?
Teaching critical thinking skills isn't high on the curriculum in the US huh?
Hell, teaching common sense doesn't seem to be on their either...
Any store is perfectly in their right to ask to ask for proof of purchase.
Otherwise you can walk out with anything and claim it's legally yours.
Any store is perfectly in their right to ask to ask for proof of purchase.
And a customer is well within their rights to tell the stores to fuck off. A store can't then hold you hostage and make you prove that you aren't a criminal:
Lol at this asshole trying to double and triple down on his faux ass authority.
I think the local and state police just fast tracked his application.Lol at this asshole trying to double and triple down on his faux ass authority.
My problem with the receipt checkers isn't a legality question, it's that the whole thing is security theater. They aren't preventing theft. If I wanted to steal from Wal-Mart it would be incredibly easy.
We bought $200 of groceries and the cart was full. A single gallon of milk was left unbagged since they, you know, have their own handle built in. Red alert! The doorman had to scour through the long receipt to make sure we paid for the 97 cent gallon of milk.
I said "Sure, you got me. I bought everything else and thought I could steal the cheapest thing in the cart by placing it in clear view instead of hiding it under all of this other stuff"
"I'm just doing my job"
An all-time classic defense.
One time the door person abandoned her post, so like anybody should do in that situation I just left the building. She comes chasing after me across the parking lot yelling that she "must" check my receipt.
It's absurd. I think they should operate like Scrabble challenges. You want to hold me up and make an implication of theft? Fine. But when you check my receipt item by item and see I've stolen nothing I get a refund and my entire cart for free. There needs to be some risk to the store for the amount of my time they waste.
I get it though, I have no rights in your privately owned building so you are free to treat me like trash. The same companies worried about Amazon putting them out of business are happy to make their default position that of "all customers are thieves." I can't wait for the day Amazon grocery expands to my area.
You do understand that sometimes they are there to actually help the customer?
Case and example one time at Costco I didn't notice the cashier scan something twice when I only had one. Person working the door checked my receipt saw that I had less items than the receipt showed, realized they double scanned something else, and I got my money back on something I didn't buy.
I will say most of the time it's just "security theater" because a place like Wal*Mart really doesn't care about theft.
I worked there during one Black Friday and they had the genius idea of leaving all the game cases wide open so people didn't have to wait for someone to unlock it. What happened? I went into the bathroom which was adjacent to electronics and found about 15 gutted video game cases. They will look the other way at any chance to sell more merchandise.
Even though you're using Costco as an example...
Do they also only selectively help aside from selectively checking your receipt/searching your cart?
Are they being paid to look at your receipt for you so you don't fuck up when you completely ignore it?
Also, I'm willing to bet yours will be one of few, if any, where someone at the door has helped instead of harassed.
I switched all my merchandise purchases over to Amazon. It's great not being treated like a criminal while I shop.
I do Costco for groceries. Costco does do receipt checks... but it's usually an 80 year old super friendly gentlemen in a wheelchair that just looks at the cart for all of 2 seconds and then puts his yellow highlight on the receipt. I'm okay with that two seconds of my time providing that dude with employment.
In the death of American physical retail, we haven't talked enough about the mechanisms for loss protection and all the other slimy things managers do. I can't say much about the long term effects but i can tell you about the effects of current policies. It leaves a bad taste and I'm down with the new economy.
I love Uber and cab drivers acting like victims after they have left black people on the corner for decades. I love Amazon and not having to deal with obvious losers who can't apologize after a clear mistake.
Soon, someone will deliver a restaurant experience to my door and i can stop eating at these restaurants with a shit eating grin, terrible service to people they "think" won't give them a good tip. But when a recession hits, they stand outside the door, begging for people to walk in or look at the menu.
IMO, the store clerk checking the ID is even more invasive than them asking to check the bag. I can't imagine at what point would the contents of my grocery bag be more valuable than the info on the ID.One is invasive, the other isn't. So...
I don't like that they put me in that situation. But why not also at the people who abuse me for doing my job politely as consistently with the sign at the entrance of the store and so many other stores?You should be mad at your employer for having such a stupid and pointless policy.
All these signs in employee areas demanding we check all bags and the bosses requiring it are what we are thinking of, not thinking that someone is stealing. They are also not being forced to show their bags.If forcing people to open their personal property isn't an allegation or suspicion then what is it?
I can understand the point of view that a few people have, that it is an inherently nasty policy to have as a (clearly posted) condition of entry that we will ask to check bags. Only a small minority of people have that view and most consider it reasonable. I mean, bring a big bag into a shop that says upon entry they can ask to check...Okay, so a few things:
1) Being polite doesn't get someone off the hook for doing something disagreeable. Kindness isn't sounding kind, it's being kind.
2) You correctly say it's not your fault, but the consumers have no way of airing their grievances with the person whose fault it is, so it not technically being your fault is not likely to be of comfort to consumers.
3) Bag checks are a policy that inconvenience consumers and provide no benefit to them. I would agree to a bag check if I got a discount on my next purchase. Employee shrink is a far greater challenge for retail than consumer shoplifting. The marginal impact of shoplifting on sticker prices is essentially zero. A company of course has a prerogative to do things that benefit themselves and not consumers, but consumers have a prerogative to respond negatively to those things. And also, most stores that do bag checks lie by claiming the bag checks are about protecting consumers, and it's offensive to be condescended to.
I personally do not abuse bag checkers (although I have walked past them a few times when I've been in a rush), but let's not lose sight of the actual problem here.
You do understand that sometimes they are there to actually help the customer?