Always-honest
Banned
gamergirly said:So you can just tear up or damage the Mona Lisa and keep kicking? Dont they have serious laws and fines on something like this?
not the Mona Lisa. but that's the Louvre.
gamergirly said:So you can just tear up or damage the Mona Lisa and keep kicking? Dont they have serious laws and fines on something like this?
I see, but not sure what you did there.Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon, mark my words, especially bad ones.
eh I wasn't serious.lawblob said:Brave man posting in a brave new world.
I get the point but you might be relieved to hear that the Mona Lisa wont' be getting kicked around as it is kept in a special climate controlled room which is behind glass that can withstand a hit from a rocket propelled grenade.gamergirly said:So you can just tear up or damage the Mona Lisa and keep kicking? Dont they have serious laws and fines on something like this?
gamergirly said:So you can just tear up or damage the Mona Lisa and keep kicking? Dont they have serious laws and fines on something like this?
Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon, mark my words, especially bad ones.
AnkitT said:I'm torn on making or not making the pun now.
Micius said:Nothing in the article about what the repercussions for the woman were for something like this? I know it was probably an accident, but wouldn't there be some kind of fine involved for her?
MomoPufflet said:It seems like there almost never is, or it's marginalized to the point of not being worth it, which is kind of insulting. It would be fine if it were a private business and the owner made that call, but basically everyone that has ever contributed to the museum in good faith ends up paying for this stupid, stupid woman's mistake.
http://www.slate.com/id/2151857/Casino mogul Steve Wynn ripped a hole through his $139 million Picasso painting while gesticulating at a cocktail party, reports the New York Post. Nora Ephron gave her own first-person account of the damage: It was "a black hole the size of a silver dollar with two three-inch long rips coming off it in either direction." Wynn had just agreed to sell the painting; now, the deal is off.
What's stupid is the museum not having protective casing. Assuming nothing will go wrong, like someone falling, is a dumnb fuck assumption.MomoPufflet said:It seems like there almost never is, or it's marginalized to the point of not being worth it, which is kind of insulting. It would be fine if it were a private business and the owner made that call, but basically everyone that has ever contributed to the museum in good faith ends up paying for this stupid, stupid woman's mistake.
Moderator, ban thyself.Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon...
Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon, mark my words, especially bad ones.
he was considered a master at age 26 by his peers. pompous prick and rightfully so, he mastered his craft at such a young age. He got so bored at doing realistic pieces that he naturally progressed to more progressive and abstract works.Verboten said:Good, I've always hated Picasso. Pompous dick. He was a better artist when he was younger who went out of his way to paint shitty. Hope this happens to the rest of his later work.
The fuck? She fell down, how does that make her "stupid"?MomoPufflet said:It seems like there almost never is, or it's marginalized to the point of not being worth it, which is kind of insulting. It would be fine if it were a private business and the owner made that call, but basically everyone that has ever contributed to the museum in good faith ends up paying for this stupid, stupid woman's mistake.
Which was shit. He was also a generally negative person (dick) in real life, so I hope all of his work and people's memory of his burns with the intensity of the sun.viakado said:he was considered a master at age 26 by his peers. pompous prick and rightfully so, he mastered his craft at such a young age. He got so bored at doing realistic pieces that he naturally progressed to more progressive and abstract works.
art is relative, who am i to argue your POV.Verboten said:Which was shit. He was also a generally negative person (dick) in real life, so I hope all of his work and people's memory of his burns with the intensity of the sun.
So, what you're saying is, other people can't/shouldn't get to enjoy his later work because you don't like it?Verboten said:Which was shit. He was also a generally negative person (dick) in real life, so I hope all of his work and people's memory of his burns with the intensity of the sun.
YES!Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon, mark my words, especially bad ones.
if there was one artist to truly shit on, its jackson pollock.Verboten said:True... eye of the beholder and all that, but this guy's work always made me want to spit. I hate spitting.
Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon, mark my words, especially bad ones.
Fucking agreed.viakado said:if there was one artist to truly shit on, its jackson pollock.
Shit dude, you didnt have to paint a picture to me.MomoPufflet said:Watch it, he's going to tear you a new one if you don't cut it out.
Yeah, but he'd probably like it.viakado said:if there was one artist to truly shit on, its jackson pollock.
He's the cause of the problem.Thaedolus said:Can we at least give Dookkake a pass?
Not cool ~Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon, mark my words, especially bad ones.
Damn it, I love the movie Bean.Graf Nudu said:
Whys that?Vennt said:The puns are going to be punishable soon, mark my words, especially bad ones.
I agree and especially on minor news like this one.Wrath2X said:Whys that?
It wouldn't be GAF without the puns, bad or good.
Thaedolus said:Can we at least give Dookkake a pass?
Teh Hamburglar said:Puns about someone dieing? Sure. Those are in bad taste. But nothing serious was lost here so why not let GAF show us some creativity in doleing outsome puns. This news article doesn't interest me at all but at least I can hope for some puns
Why is that? Why is it bannable? Seriously I've been hearing all kinds of puns ever since I joined GAF, Count Dookake makes a living on them.Vennt said:The problem isn't puns as such, the problem is what's called a "pun cascade" where nearly the first 2 pages of a thread are worthless attempts at "winning the thread" that rather than being entertainment just cheapen the OP, thread and even the good jokes for the sake of it, it's getting tiring and like most memes that start out worthwhile, overdone to the point of ridiculousness.
No, a pun in the right place, like punctuation, is a brilliant thing, but that's starting to be weakened by a race to "teh win!" that lots of people are getting sick of.
Tell you what, lets make it fun again, lets allow such pun cascades, where a winner of a thread can indeed be lauded, but all runner-ups get a weeks ban... Might make people hold back a bit and make life interesting
Wrath2X said:Why is that? Why is it bannable?
bjork said:I think his post explained it well enough. One pun once in awhile, sure. 900000 Dookake clithangers and wannabes, annoying as shit.