psychotron
Member
I've been watching a lot of Batman stuff lately because of Injustice 2, and that reminded me that I didn't play Batman origins, want that for BC!
Yes! Agreed on that. Never did get to play that.
I've been watching a lot of Batman stuff lately because of Injustice 2, and that reminded me that I didn't play Batman origins, want that for BC!
Funny you all mentioned this. The season pass is on sale this week for $10 for Gold membersEach part of the DLC is on the store, but it bundle only. I assume you need to buy the season pass if you want to buy it from the Xbox One Marketplace. The DLC is available for purchase separately on the website or you might be able to find it through the ingame DLC menu on Xbox One.
Borderlands 1 includes all the DLC for free on Xbox One. No additional downloads required.
I did this back in the day and it worked. DLC even shows up on English on the Storage menu.
I like it. The thread title should be updated for E3; just in time for more salt.
(I love my PS4 Pro, but seriously - what the hell, Sony...?)
I have an idea on a super original thread title
Xbox One Backwards Compatibility |OT2| why would anybody play this?
I have an idea on a super original thread title
Xbox One Backwards Compatibility |OT2| why would anybody play this?
All of the Assassins Creed 3 DLCs are on sale
Season Pass is $10
Spotted both Crackdown and Marble blast ultra is with the BC team. Must be close
Interesting. I had personally filed Marble Blast Ultra as pretty unlikely due to it being delisted for years. One of my first XBLA purchases.
Didn't they give it away to Gold members at one point?
E3 next week. like others have said, I expect some mention of BC crackdown at the show so fingers crossed for next week.
Didn't they give it away to Gold members at one point? Even though I have a disc, I remember getting a freebie DL version at some point. Either that or I'm mad.
Man I almost somehow forgot about Microsoft Points. "Case Zero normally 400 points"
I have an idea on a super original thread title
Xbox One Backwards Compatibility |OT2| why would anybody play this?
How big is the Xbox Backwards compatibility team?
BooI'd imagine that like any group of people they're normal-sized on average...probably some taller, some shorter etc...
This is online users only and based on 930k players not 25+ mil One owners. They mention this in the article too.I don't know if it was already posted, but according with arstechnica Jim Ryan is kind of right.
Only 1,5% time of xbox one players is spent with x360 bc.
oh marble blast would be real nice.
All of the Assassins Creed 3 DLCs are on sale
Season Pass is $10
I have an idea on a super original thread title
Xbox One Backwards Compatibility |OT2| why would anybody play this?
I have an idea on a super original thread title
Xbox One Backwards Compatibility |OT2| why would anybody play this?
Do you really actually think that the majority of people think there's no value in older games? Have you seen retro games in the last 5 years? They are more popular than ever. The reason this keeps happening to video games is because for almost every generation until recently, architectures changed so made it more difficult to keep backwards compatibility without a significant cost. Now that Arcutectures are the same, The PS5 should have full backwards compatible with the PS4 and the next xbox after scorpio should have full backwards compatible with the xbox one.I legitimately can't understand how many people on this site would be willing to let something like this never exist just because it either doesn't get enough attention from most players or the somehow even worse explanation; they belive there's no value in older games.
It's mind boggling to me.
When you decide to watch movies, read books, or listen to music from previous generations, you don't have these issues and afaik, people willing to defend them if there ever were. So why do video games seem to be the only form of media that consistently does?
I legitimately can't understand how many people on this site would be willing to let something like this never exist just because it either doesn't get enough attention from most players or the somehow even worse explanation; they belive there's no value in older games.
It's mind boggling to me.
When you decide to watch movies, read books, or listen to music from previous generations, you don't have these issues and afaik, people willing to defend them if there ever were. So why do video games seem to be the only form of media that consistently does?
This is the one.
it's just more console wars crap. The ps4 doesnt do it, so it must be a shit feature.
I got 100 BC 360 games on my profile, many were completely free because I already bought them years ago. It's great, even if I don't immediately jump to play them right now. I enjoyed BC on the ps2, wii, and 360 too, as I'm always finding old gems or just want to play old stuff in a better way.
And? What reason is there to believe that this is still an inaccurate sample? It's a huge player sample. You need to have online connectivity to even get BC games working so if anything the sample could skew high for how much game time goes to BC games. This isn't the first analysis that pointed out the rarity of BC usage by players.This is online users only and based on 930k players not 25+ mil One owners. They mention this in the article too.
People aren't saying they are against it existing. They are against the weight given to it regarding discussion of the value of new consoles because it is a narrowly touched feature. All data and surveys suggest it is a widely requested but rarely used feature - not just regarding Xbox One.I legitimately can't understand how many people on this site would be willing to let something like this never exist just because it either doesn't get enough attention from most players or the somehow even worse explanation; they belive there's no value in older games.
It's mind boggling to me.
When you decide to watch movies, read books, or listen to music from previous generations, you don't have these issues and afaik, people willing to defend them if there ever were. So why do video games seem to be the only form of media that consistently does?
This is the one.
I'm calling another dry week. Hoping for them to make some E3 announcements. I know, I know, but you can't go into E3 with 2 full weeks without releases.
People aren't saying they are against it existing. They are against the weight given to it regarding discussion of the value of new consoles because it is a narrowly touched feature. All data and surveys suggest it is a widely requested but rarely used feature - not just regarding Xbox One.
Actually people are saying exactly that.
Admittedly, those people saying that are the minority.
That said, I don't agree with the stance offered here either. It's importance comes from outside of its time spent played, and it's bewildering to see so many on a gaming forum of all places not understand that. Taking a business perspective is fine and all, but using it to downplay a feature that is very pro-consumer and important to the preservation of video game history is when I have to question the intentions behind the words. And there's a lot of that happening in the various BC threads currently.