-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
AngryJoe receives a Nintendo copyright claim. Hope they enjoyed the ad revenue; Done
- Thread starter Khalifa Jayy
- Start date
Infernal Monkey
Member
Another opinion on the case, I'm just gonna leave this here, viewer discretion reccomended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACxVUcCq4Lc
Still no ReviewTechUSA video...
This is incredible.
Tom Nook Sawyer
Member
In the example I quoted, the developer and publisher are largely the same.
My point is that I doubt IGN's paying Nintendo--or any other company--to cover their games. And I'd like to see a cite from someone that claims the contrary
Opinionatedfish
Member
That's a Copyright Claim, NOT a Copyright Strike, NOT a Privacy Claim, NOT a DMCA Takedown Request, NOT a Community Complaint, and not any of the other horrible things that could happen. There are almost less protections for YouTube Hosts than there are for eBay Sellers.
You either get busy disputing or get busy crying.
You either get busy disputing or get busy crying.
mgs2master2
Banned
So like clockwork
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz09W2Z6OOU
Final nintendo angry rant was just uploaded and probably monetized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz09W2Z6OOU
Final nintendo angry rant was just uploaded and probably monetized.
water_wendi
Water is not wet!
James Scott
Banned
Not sure why there would be a RT USA video. There's no new news, I think he already posted a video on it earlier last yearAnother opinion on the case, I'm just gonna leave this here, viewer discretion reccomended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACxVUcCq4Lc
Still no ReviewTechUSA video...
Oh, cool... the video we've all been talking about for almost sixty pages. Thanks.
Palculator
Unconfirmed Member
Another opinion on the case, I'm just gonna leave this here, viewer discretion reccomended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACxVUcCq4Lc
Still no ReviewTechUSA video...
What's his problem?
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
Just because they're covering a game for review or preview doesn't mean they're not playing other games.
And no, that's not what this whole thread is about. You might want to read the OP.
No one knows who he is.
Aeriscloud
Banned
He made sure it was over 10 minutes of ranting, so yes, probably.
Mobius and pet octopus
Member
Another opinion on the case, I'm just gonna leave this here, viewer discretion reccomended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACxVUcCq4Lc
Still no ReviewTechUSA video...
This video is basically reflecting what I think, in more vulgar language.
He either 1. didn't do his homework which makes him look stupid, 2. did his homework and did it anyway which means he is arrogant as fuck, believing himself above the law/rules, or 3. did it to generate news/clicks (most likely) which fabricated this entire controversy of vargas vs nintendo (which to me is just shameful).
Beelzebufo
Banned
Haha dude sometimes your one liners are really great. Thanks for keeping things light, in a weird way.
Another opinion on the case, I'm just gonna leave this here, viewer discretion reccomended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACxVUcCq4Lc
Still no ReviewTechUSA video...
Who the fuck is this? Why is he yelling like Joe shot his
I thought this guy was being ironic or something.
--
My brother just walked by and he was wondering if I was watching somebody have a mental breakdown.
He wasn't wrong.
What the fuck did I just watchAnother opinion on the case, I'm just gonna leave this here, viewer discretion reccomended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACxVUcCq4Lc
Still no ReviewTechUSA video...
Who knows. Magic?
The weird thing about this is that he already got hit by this thing with Mario Kart 8 and complained about.
Why did he think it would be any different with Mario Party 10? Did he not check if anything had changed since?
There's also the fact that he says he blew 900$ on a Wii U + Games + Accessories but in a previous video he said it was the fans that donated the money so he could get the Wii U.
Why did he think it would be any different with Mario Party 10? Did he not check if anything had changed since?
There's also the fact that he says he blew 900$ on a Wii U + Games + Accessories but in a previous video he said it was the fans that donated the money so he could get the Wii U.
I think we're well beyond the fact that this is fabricated controversy for attention.
I've been saying this. Nobody has been listening.
ElectricKaibutsu
Member
Fishy...
More importantly, why the fuck is this guy having a psychotic break over the fact that Joe won't be having Nintendo on his channel?
Why should content creators HAVE to put up a Nintendo video? Why is there a problem when he wants to do other things?
His fan's "donations" are his source of revenue.
His fans asked him to buy a Wii U, and after years of begging he finally caved in.
Before any of these controversies, he was already saying he enjoyed the Wii U more than XBO/PS4
Nintendo Magic at work I guess.
Yet people are still defending him... Hmmm...
Orochinagis
Member
Aside from his reviews he doesnt seem to invest money in his streams at all. On Topic I rarely see him playing Nintendo games or reviewing Nintendo games.
Do you know the main source of revenue for streamers?
Beelzebufo
Banned
Yup. Fabricated controversy, but built on something that's still kinda shitty.
call_kotaku
Member
They do, above and beyond what's probably reasonable, and I don't see how allowing people to make Let's Plays degrades their rights to control their properties. Copyrights have to be enforced for them to matter, yes, but I don't see what putting up both bureaucratic and financial barriers for people to cover their games is really protecting them from. Plus reserving the right to possibly refuse any video that expresses an opinion about their games that they don't agree with is a slippery slope to go down, and the fact that Nintendo are okay with being completely blatant about it while Microsoft tried to do the same thing on the down-low and got slammed for it is a testament to how much leeway people give Nintendo.
Because he seems to like to beat the dead horse with some topics.
Nah he's just a guy who rants about gaming and "the gaming community" and occasionally other random stuff.
SmokedMeat
Gamer™
Another opinion on the case, I'm just gonna leave this here, viewer discretion reccomended: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACxVUcCq4Lc
Still no ReviewTechUSA video...
Hey everyone look at me! I'm going to call Angry Joe out on this in hopes of gaining some attention and subscribers, cause I can really use some! I'll be sure to get even angrier than Joe was, and I'll be sure to cuss and have my veins bulging and everything!
Man sets up comfy lawn chair in middle of busy intersection, very upset after being sideswiped by car.
Moon_frogger
Member
Honestly this all stems from youtubes rules regarding copyrighted content. It's YouTube that allows publishers to take all the revenue. That's why the whole discussion about a double standard for review sites is pointless. If these youtubers don't like YouTube's rules they can always just go start their own site.
blankempathy
Member
and He'll sue to boot for not being warned enough that it was dangerous to sit in the middle of the intersection.
Yeah, thats the biggest mystery, I think he also complained about the Program from nintendo on twitter
Mr. Giggles
Member
I still don't fully understand what Nintendo has to lose by allowing let's plays..angry Joe must be steaming
Opinionatedfish
Member
For a copyright claim, you would want to contact Nintendo of America's Legal Team.
Here's the page with their contact information.
http://www.nintendo.com/corp/ippolicy.jsp
Copyright Claims are usually automated. If you feel it is incorrect, dispute it. Also, take it a few steps further if you are sure you're use is fair.
Pop
Member
I think Joe was streaming this on twitch and after decided to put it up on youtube. I wouldn't say this is fabricated or in anyway blame AJ.
This is Nintendo's fault. Shitty the way they go about this.
Mobius and pet octopus
Member
mgs2master2
Banned
Joe already knew that Nintendo does this. This isn't his first rant about getting a ContentID match of a video of a Nintendo game.
Instead of using their partner program or not doing Nintendo videos any more, he just said "Fuck it" and went ahead anyway. That's where I fault him in all this. He knew what would likely happen, he just hoped he could skate by unnoticed and acted surprised and upset when he couldn't.
Just like anybody I guess. *shrugs*
Mobius and pet octopus
Member
So if you're not an internet celebrity you're a nobody? Okay.
Found the tweet where he already complained about the programm https://twitter.com/AngryJoeShow/status/562455254583611392
He knew very well what would happen
I don't think Nintendo made the right choices, but this seems fishy from Joe
His Rants usually generates more klicks then his lets Play, so maybe he took the opportunity...again
He knew very well what would happen
I don't think Nintendo made the right choices, but this seems fishy from Joe
His Rants usually generates more klicks then his lets Play, so maybe he took the opportunity...again
No, Joe knew about Nintendo's policy. He got a copyright claim before and even made a video ranting about it then. Also, why is he so butthurt about Nintendo wanting to split the monetization if it's just a stream from Twitch? It's not like he put any additional effort into the Youtube version.
He wanted to call attention to it.
Plain and simple.
He already said it in his first video that he was going to upload another Nintendo video at some point regardless, and that if something happened he would be done.
No conspiracy here he's very direct about it.
Yeah, it wouldn't matter if he had millions of fans, the video would still be watching someone go Joe Pesci over video games.
