Which is a scary, scary future.
Not to mention incredibly sexist, it would literally be regressing to the point where women might as well start covering up.
Which is a scary, scary future.
Seems to be the woman the character in the trailer was modeled after where she was on her knees covered in blood with her blades out and several dead bodies surrounding her.
What do you guys think about the Trish photoshoot for the Playboy magazine? Sexism or not? Positive, negative, good, bad? I assume that was most definitely approved by CDPR, was it not?
She's naked all over the game and its not really at odds with her character.What do you guys think about the Trish photoshoot for the Playboy magazine? Sexism or not? Positive, negative, good, bad? I assume that was most definitely approved by CDPR, was it not?
No problem for me. What's your opinion then?What do you guys think about the Trish photoshoot for the Playboy magazine? Sexism or not? Positive, negative, good, bad? I assume that was most definitely approved by CDPR, was it not?
Game promotion on multiple fronts. Not discriminatory nor a suggestion of broadbrushing all redheads in their mid 20s as sexual objects with high experience in rodent control concept.What do you guys think about the Trish photoshoot for the Playboy magazine? Sexism or not? Positive, negative, good, bad? I assume that was most definitely approved by CDPR, was it not?
Can someone explain that picture to me, though? Why does she have to be dressed like that?
Which is a scary, scary future.
Yeah but what exactly are they pointing out? the context to that picture and the what leads up to it is lost. Just because they see a scantly clad women.
Context: A virus is going around making cyborgs and trans human alike lose their shit and creating havoc out of no where. An this promo character killed people in a night club hence heir dress, plus note the genre. But even in the end her story doesn't end there.
Well if I recon right, a lot of feminist love Bayonetta for being sexy and have a full control on her sexuality. Really, it's just how you do it. And sometimes in the same game and with the same character it can be done right and sometimes wrong.But pretty much all the notes me woman in the witches 3 easily classify as powerful women that take charge of their sexuality.
Yes they are written that way, that doesn't take away from the fact that it's empowering, not sexist.
To say otherwise would be to imply that any woman in fiction cannot have a sexual aspect without being sexist.
Not to mention incredibly sexist, it would literally be regressing to the point where women might as well start covering up.
Sure, but we don't have this context--real or like the one you imagine--all we have is this woman in her underwear--which, again, isn't new or interesting--and feels rather more unfortunate given the state of the industry and its history. it's entirely possible critics might regret their words and deeds as the full context becomes clear, but on its own, i can definitely see the criticism.
The character in the trailer is cg puppet. She's not in charge of anything. She's drawn, modeled, posed, and written by dozens of individuals.
Well if I recon right, a lot of feminist love Bayonetta for being sexy and have a full control on her sexuality. Really, it's just how you do it. And sometimes in the same game and with the same character it can be done right and sometimes wrong.
Let's analyze the sex scenes in the Witcher 3 for example. There's no problem with that in theory, but for instance, the camera insist so much on the tits and the ass of Yen rather on the emotions of the characters that it's obvious the point is to arouse the player and considering he's a straight guy (don't get me on "but what if the player is lesbian/bisexual and enjoys it", we can all enjoy it, I'm a straight guy myself, I watch porn like everybody else, it's not my point). Really it's just a matter of ingredients, how you wish to talk about it.
And I hate to repeat myself but really, I can understand why a lot of you disagree but we don't have to fall in the "it's PC SJW bullshit, now everything sexy is sexist", I'm sure we can have a constructive discussion.
The Chinese room, really?
Maybe they should spend some of that effort adding a run button to Rapture so someone will actually buy it
If the model wanted to do it, so what? It can be viewed as good or bad depending on personal opinion and aversion to sex/nudity, but it is not sexist.
Hot.
She's naked all over the game and its not really at odds with her character.
No problem for me. What's your opinion then?
Game promotion on multiple fronts. Not discriminatory nor a suggestion of broadbrushing all redheads in their mid 20s as sexual objects with high experience in rodent control concept.
hold r2 lmao
hold r2 lmao
hold r2 lmao
at least they make good ones
No model, it's Trish the in-game character.
And I hate to repeat myself but really, I can understand why a lot of you disagree but we don't have to fall in the "it's PC SJW bullshit, now everything sexy is sexist", I'm sure we can have a constructive discussion.
Sure, but we don't have this context--real or like the one you imagine--all we have is this woman in her underwear--which, again, isn't new or interesting--and feels rather more unfortunate given the state of the industry and its history. it's entirely possible critics might regret their words and deeds as the full context becomes clear, but on its own, i can definitely see the criticism.
Then it's simply nude pixels. Even less of a concern to be outraged about.
notedThis sort of childish comment is exactly why this industry is the way it is.
hold r2 lmao
CDProjekt doesn't pick GameSpots article thumbnails...I don't think anyone should be too chuffed by The Chinese Room's reaction; the original promotional image was clearly designed to be provocative. This is the type of controversy someone along the chain at CDPR likely expected and wanted.
Read the thread.Anyone remember collecting whore cards in W1 for banging chicks?
Well, the point we're arguing right now is how CDPR allegedly use sexual images perceived as sexist and how sexism allegedly pervades their games so the fact that it is "pixels" or not doesn't have anything to do with it, really.
Pfff.
What is it with people these days... Everything needs to be so 'correct' what is wrong with seeing some tits or/and ass in a game?
Man/woman/trans are all equal to me. Let everybody live their lives. But please let me have some tits and ass in my game now and then. Preferably without drama surrounding it!
I don't think anyone should be too chuffed by The Chinese Room's reaction; the original promotional image was clearly designed to be provocative. This is the type of controversy someone along the chain at CDPR likely expected and wanted.
The Chinese Room: "this thing is probably sexist because it's doing things with the female form that were orchestrated by men"
A whole bunch of men on the internet: "it's not sexist at all, and let me tell you why"
"Maybe we should get some women to weigh in on this"
"Good one! Us gamers, huh? Last thing we need is more Anita Sarkeesians thoughtcriming us with her 1984s. Next you'll tell me Olivia Munn isn't appropriating nerd culture!"
"Could we maybe show a chick without having her all scantily-clad and whatnot"
"CENSORSHIP (nevermind that i'm not giving women a platform here), FREE SPEECH (nope still don't care about actual women having opinions on this), SJW THOUGHT POLICE (still don't care)"
"You know you can make powerful women characters without having them show off the goods right"
"Nice try satan! But those of us comfortable with ourobjectification of womensexuality know that there's nothing wrong witheye candyputting women on display for their bodies and nothing elsea bunch of dudes on set posing a photoreal woman puppet to be on her knees in an attempt to drum up some presencethe female form. What, are you saying Females shouldn't be comfortable with their bodies? That's extremely offensive and reverse objectification is very surprising coming from an SJW like yourself. It's about ethics in games journalisms, not treating women like people"
Read the thread.
I don't think anyone should be too chuffed by The Chinese Room's reaction; the original promotional image was clearly designed to be provocative. This is the type of controversy someone along the chain at CDPR likely expected and wanted.
Not to mention The Chinese Room is doing the exact same thing for hits, considering there's no real loss for them in doing so. Best-case scenario, CD Projekt Red has to answer to the accusations, worst-case it stays isolated in petty squabbles like this where a bunch of dudes tell women what's empowering and what's not and why they should be happy to be paraded around half-naked.
For the 100th time. This is not a promotional image. It was never used by CDPR in promotional campaign. It was released by their contractors who made the teaser in their behance article. http://www.cgmeetup.net/home/making-of-cyberpunk-2077-by-platige-images/
For the 100th time. This is not a promotional image. It was never used by CDPR in promotional campaign. It was released by their contractors who made the teaser in their behance article. http://www.cgmeetup.net/home/making-of-cyberpunk-2077-by-platige-images/
As opposed to The Chinese Room, who make neither sexist games nor games.
Even if it were a promotional image it is fine if the model is happy to be used to promote. Yes. Really. It is fine. Adult content in an adult game.
Evidently they aren't, if you're putting "trans" into a category all its own and lumping everything into a gender trinary. Not to mention, y'know, the rest of your post is kind of at odds with the idea.
Not to mention The Chinese Room is doing the exact same thing for hits, considering there's no real loss for them in doing so. Best-case scenario, CD Projekt Red has to answer to the accusations, worst-case it stays isolated in petty squabbles like this where a bunch of dudes tell women what's empowering and what's not and why they should be happy to be paraded around half-naked.
That perspective renders the whole debate about whether a ficitonal character has "agency" or not rather moot, wouldn't you agree? Since the answer would always be "none of them ever do".