• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New café in Melbourne charging men 18% more to highlight gender wage gap

Vanillalite

Ask me about the GAF Notebook
CNN

170807215705-cafe-gender-pay-gap-trnd-01-super-169.jpg

A café in Melbourne, Australia, is giving its male customers a side of gender equity with their lattes.

At Handsome Her, men are asked to pay an 18% premium to "reflect the gender pay gap." Men earn an average 17.7% more than women for full-time work in Australia, a government report found. The difference is roughly the same in the United States.

The café, which opened its doors for the first time Thursday, is hoping to shine a spotlight on the issue.

"All we really wanted was to raise awareness and start conversations about the gender gap," Belle Ngien, the café's manager, told CNN. The voluntary donations are collected during one week every month and given to women's charities, Ngien said.
 

Akuun

Looking for meaning in GAF
Sounds like it's voluntary. Basically asking for a donation with each purchase.

It's nice that they're drawing attention to this stuff, but I dunno if this will get the effect that they want.
 

jett

D-Member
I read this the other day.

It's one day a week, and it's entirely optional. So besides being a marketing stunt, I don't see the point.
 

Viewt

Member
It's voluntary, highlights an important issue, and the extra money goes to a good cause. But somebody's going to find a reason to get all up in arms about it regardless.
 

Keasar

Member
I commend them for the initiative, I just hope they are prepared for what will be coming, as the MRA's of the internet howls in the dark and marches upon their gates.

giphy.gif
 

Kinyou

Member
Sounds like it's voluntary. Basically asking for a donation with each purchase.

It's nice that they're drawing attention to this stuff, but I dunno if this will get the effect that they want.
Is it voluntary? The sign says "men will be charged 18% premium"

Edit: ah the article calls it voluntary donation
 

Lagamorph

Member
Seeing as it's voluntary I don't see any issues with this.

If it were mandatory it'd be a discrimination lawsuit waiting to happen.
 

Tregard

Soothsayer
This would have to be voluntary, wouldn't it? It wouldn't be legal to charge more for the same product, I would have thought.
 

indask8

Member
Outside of a few mens attracted by the concept, I'm sure most will just go elsewhere, maybe that's the plan ?

Also, bad yelp reviews incoming...
 

mavo

Banned
Can you hear it?

Is the sound of all microeconomics professor having an orgasm at the same time.
 
The article says the fee is voluntary, but this quote doesn't sound like it's voluntary.

"Sometimes it's hard for people to change their minds," she said. "We're not in the business of changing people's minds. They are welcome to go elsewhere if they don't want to pay a voluntary donation."
 

Mohonky

Member
Seeing as it's voluntary I don't see any issues with this.

If it were mandatory it'd be a discrimination lawsuit waiting to happen.

I'm not going to say you HAVE too, we're just going to look down on you if you dont.....also we reserve the right to sit you next to the garbage bin outside in the alley.

The article says the fee is voluntary, but this quote doesn't sound like it's voluntary.

Its only voluntary because its illegal to charge more on the basis of sex. In the same way its illegal to pay a worker less based on sex.

Its just some passive aggressive coffee shop owner trying to make a statement.
 

Wvrs

Member
Fuck me, like the people responsible for the wage gap are even going to be drinking there. The gender wage gap sucks, but things like this, though well intentioned, seem to be missing the point of equality. Why don't we charge wealthy people more for their coffees to highlight the class inequality. I've certainly met hundreds of women who grew up with more privilege than I've ever known; I went to school with them, I went to University with them, I've dated them, I've worked with them, and I've had those selfsame people and others try to make me feel as though I'm part of the problem because of people boiling down inequality to easy talking points like this.

Leftism has been hijacked by a cabal of champagne socialists.
 

ryan13ts

Member
As it's a voluntary donation that's going to a good place and helps point out some very gross disparities in wages, I'm perfectly ok with this.

You know there's going to be some raging misogynists that's going to have a field day with this though.
 
D

Deleted member 1235

Unconfirmed Member
I don't know how big the cafe is, but I can't actually really picture how 'women have priority seating' would even work practically.

If I was sitting down and someone walked over and sit some young fit girl needs my seat and asked me 18% extra for a coffee as well, I would laugh, pay it and never go back then tell everyone about this shit place I went to once.

good luck to them.
 
Great marketing campaign.

It's a voluntary donation anyways, so yeah I struggle to get too up in arms about it.

...or is it voluntary? I'm not really sure.
 

Vagabundo

Member
Not sure how priority seating would work with a mixed group. If you have men in the mix does it taint everyone? What if my wife buys me the food. lol I suppose I'd be bemused if I stumbled across this IRL.

No wage gap in my workplace all wages are fixed by payscales and length of services.
 

Preezy

Member
Regarding OP - But haven't plenty of studies shown that there isn't a gender pay gap when you take into account length of service, type of job and hours worked?

Is that not a thing?
 

hollomat

Banned
A bar in New York had a similar concept on some occasions but instead women had a discount

Wouldn't this be illegal though, since the bar is discriminating based on gender?

With the cafe in Australia since it's a donation it seems like it'd be legal.
 

the1npc

Member
But haven't plenty of studies shown that there isn't a gender pay gap when you take into account length of service, type of job and hours worked?

Is that not a thing?

Ive heard this too but I dont know enough about it personally
 
Its only voluntary because its illegal to charge more on the basis of sex. In the same way its illegal to pay a worker less based on sex.

Its just some passive aggressive coffee shop owner trying to make a statement.

I get that, but the owner is saying pay the fee or go somewhere else, which means it's not voluntary.

Some anti-discrimination lawyer is going to have a field day with this place.
 

AoM

Member
I read this the other day.

It's one day a week, and it's entirely optional. So besides being a marketing stunt, I don't see the point.

In the article, it says one week a month.

And I'm confused when it says voluntary, yet the sign says "will be charged".
 

Mohonky

Member
Regarding OP - But haven't plenty of studies shown that there isn't a gender pay gap when you take into account length of service, type of job and hours worked?

Is that not a thing?

Its a thing, in the same way if you look at which job roles men and women typically apply for you'll find the distribution rolls out differently and of course some sectors pay more than others.

You also need to look at what men and women typically study and the prospective job outcomes of that study.
 
Regarding OP - But haven't plenty of studies shown that there isn't a gender pay gap when you take into account length of service, type of job and hours worked?

Is that not a thing?

I've read stuff like that too, and is useful data when examining individual industries.

But the point of the 18% number (Australia) and the 23% number (USA, last I checked) is to illustrate the overall pay gap between the sexes across all workers, to expose a broader trend that needs to be addressed over time.

In the article, it says one week a month.

And I'm confused when it says voluntary, yet the sign says "will be charged".

It's "voluntary" in that you can simply choose not to get your coffee there during that week. lol
 
Women have priority seating is a weird rule, isn't that a return to Victorian era

I mean as a gentleman I always give up my seat to a lady on a bus or train or whatever, but seems a weird thing to write down

Regarding OP - But haven't plenty of studies shown that there isn't a gender pay gap when you take into account length of service, type of job and hours worked?

in the US the pay gap shrinks dramatically in many jobs for the same job, down to 1-4%. The 20-30% gap arises from the fact that more men are in higher pay positions basically, not just Vice President/etc level but for example comp sci , garbage collection, cops or firemen jobs which are all high pay, etc.
http://www.payscale.com/gender-lifetime-earnings-gap

Also its been statistically shown that to increase your pay in your job the best option is to find a new job in the same field but at a different company, and statistically women are less likely to switch companies to pursue higher salary. Its a staggering difference too, employees who stay in companies longer than 2 years get paid FIFTY PERCENT less in lifetime earnings. thats just insane.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/camero...ompanies-longer-than-2-years-get-paid-50-less
 
Top Bottom