Devolution
Member
Within feminism there is constant talk about the trials and tribulations women face. The double standards, the pressure to conform to old values and feminism has gone a long way to help women deal and denounce traditional bullshit that just doesn't work if we want equality. It's not wrong in any way but I've come to find that I'm not necessarily learning anything new about my gender's plight so I decided to read about the plight of men my age. On a recommendation from Mumei, I picked up Guyland, which looks at what's going on with men from a feminist and supportive perspective. A lot of reviews bash it for being too critical but I don't think they actually read it without feeling personally vilified, or maybe didn't read it at all since in one of the very first chapters he talks about not viewing all young men as subject to the rules and regulations he tries to map in the book. Here are some passages:
I'd like to get more honest points of view from Gaffers on how they feel traditional molds of masculinity keep them down. I'd like to talk about it without needing to target feminism, like so many MRA movements tend to do. Feminism, is not the issue here and I'm tired of discussions revolving around the unfair definitions of masculinity coming back to some anti-feminist screed or the desire for equality tipping the scales in women's favor. I might be setting the bar too high but let's actually try this since I can't learn of men's experiences with these outdated notions without asking them firsthand.
It's easy to observe "guys" virtually everywhere in Americain every high school and college campus in America with their baseball caps on frontward or backward, their easy smiles or anxious darting eyes, huddled around tiny electronic gadgets or laptops, or relaxing in front of massive wide-screen hi-def TVs, in basements, dorms and frat houses. But it would be a mistake to assume that each conforms fully to a regime of peer-influenced and enforced behaviors that I call the "Guy Code," or shares all traits and attitudes with everyone else. It's important to remember that individual guys are not the same as "Guyland."
In fact my point is precisely the opposite. Though Guyland is pervasiveit is the air guys breathe, the water they drinkeach guy cuts his own deal with it as he ties to navigate the passage from adolescence to adulthood without succumbing to the most soul-numbing spirit crushing elements that surround him every day.
Guys often feel they're entirely on their own as they navigate the murky shadows and the dangerous eddies that run in Guyland's swift current. They often stop talking to their parents, who "just don't get it." Other adults seem equally clueless. And they can't confide in one another lest they risk being exposed for the confused creatures they are. So they're left alone, confused, trying to come to terms with a world they themselves barely understand. They couch their insecurity in bravado and bluster, a fearless strut barely concealing a tremulous anxiety. They test themselves in fantasy worlds and in drinking contests, enduring humiliation and pain at the hands of others.
All the while, many do suspect that something's rotten in the state of Manhood. They struggle to conceal their own sense of fraudulence and can smell it on others. But few can admit to it, lest all the emperors-to-be will be revealed as disrobed. They go along, in mime.
Just as one can support the troops but oppose the war, so too can one appreciate and support individual guys while engaging critically with the social and cultural world they inhabit. In fact I believe that only by understanding this world can we truly be empathetic to the guy in our lives. We need to enter this world, see the perilous field in which boys become men in our society because we desperately need to start a conversation about that world. We do boys a great disservice by turning away, excusing the excesses of Guyland as just "boys will be boys"because we fail to see just how powerful its influence really is. Only when we begin to engage in these conversations, with open eyes and open heartsas parents to children, as friends, as themselvescan we both reduce the risks and enable guys to navigate it more successfully. This book is an attempt to map that terrain in order to enable guysand those who know them, care about them, love themto steer a course with greater integrity and honesty, so they can be true not to some artificial code, but to themselves.
Whenever I ask young women what they think it means to be a woman, they look at me puzzled and say, basically, "Whatever I want." "It doesn't mean anything at all to me," says Nicole, a junior at Colby College in Maine. "I can be Mia Hamm, I can be Britney Spears, I can be Madame Curie or Madonna. Nobody can tell me what it means to be a woman anymore."
For men, the question is still meaningfuland powerful. In countless workshops on college campuses and in high-school assemblies, I've asked young men what it means to be a man. I've asked guys from every state in the nation, as well as about fifteen other countries what sort of phrases and words come to mind when they hear someone say, "Be a man!"
The responses are rather predictable. The first thing someone usually says is "Don't cry," the other similar phrases and ideasnever show your feelings, never ask for directions, never give up, never give in, be strong, be aggressive, show no fear, show no mercy, get rich, get even, get laid, winfollow easily after that.
Here's what guys say, summarized into a set of current epigrams, Think of it as a "Real Guy's Top Ten List."
1. Boys don't cry
2. It's better to be mad than sad
3. Don't get madget even
4. Take it like a man
5. He who has the most toys when he dies, wins
6. Just do it or Ride or Die
7. Size matters
8. I don't stop to ask for directions
9. Nice guys finish last
10. It's all good
The unifying emotional subtext of all these aphorisms involves never showing emotions or admitting to weakness. The face you must show to the world insists that everything is going just fine, that everything is under control, that there's nothing to be concerned about (a contemporary version of Alfred E. Neuman of MAD Magazine's "What, me worry?"). Winning is crucial, especially when the victory is over other men who lave less amazing or smaller toys. Kindness is not an option, nor is compassion. These sentiments are taboo.
This is "The Guy Code", the collection of attitudes, values and traits that together composes what it means to be a man. These are rules that govern the behavior in Guyland, the criteria that will be used to evaluate whether any particular guy measures up. The Guy Code revisits what psychologist Willian Pollack called "the boy code" in his best selling book Real Boysjust a couple of years older and with a lot more at stake. And just as Pollack and others have explored the dynamics of boyhood so well, we now need to end the reach of that analysis to include late adolescence and young adulthood.
In 1976, social psychologist Robert Brannon summarized the four basic rules of masculinity:
1. "No Sissy Stuff!" Being a man means not being a sissy, not being perceived as weak, effeminate or gay. Masculinity is the relentless repudiation of the feminine.
2. "Be a Big Wheel." This rule refers to the centrality of success and power in the definition of masculinity. Masculinity is measured more by wealth, power and status than by any particular body part.
3. "Be a Sturdy Oak." What makes a man is that he is reliable in a crisis. And what makes him so reliable in a crisis is not that he is able to respond fully and appropriately to the situation at hand, but rather that he resemble an inanimate object. A rock, a pillar, a species of tree.
4. "Give 'Em Hell." Exude an aura of daring and aggression. Live life out on the edge. Take risks. Go for it. Pay no attention to what others think.
Amazingly, these four rules have changed very little among successive generations of high-school and college age men. James O'Niel, a developmental psychologist at the University of Connecticut, and Joseph Pleck, a social psychologist at the University of Illinois, have each been conducting studies of this normative definition of masculinity for decades. "One of the most surprising findings," O'Neil told me, "is how little the rules have changed."
I'd like to get more honest points of view from Gaffers on how they feel traditional molds of masculinity keep them down. I'd like to talk about it without needing to target feminism, like so many MRA movements tend to do. Feminism, is not the issue here and I'm tired of discussions revolving around the unfair definitions of masculinity coming back to some anti-feminist screed or the desire for equality tipping the scales in women's favor. I might be setting the bar too high but let's actually try this since I can't learn of men's experiences with these outdated notions without asking them firsthand.