This thread is pretty embarrassing with all the overreactions.
NeoGAF is pretty embarrassing with all the overreactions.
They should not have used the term "Season Pass".
As far as I can tell, it is just a discounted opportunity to buy all the DLC packs at once? Not unlike the NSMB 2 DLC, or the newer Streetpass games.
I don't see any problem here.
Most are.
Fixed that for you...
...isn't that usually how Season Passes work? Pre-buy the DLC and in the end it'll be cheaper than if you bought it piece-meal?
So i somehow get the concept of a season pass on console shootbangs, but this one? So you save 3 dollars if you buy them all together? But why only for a season? Do i get them forever if i buy them seperaty? It doesnt make sense.
So i somehow get the concept of a season pass on console shootbangs, but this one? So you save 3 dollars if you buy them all together? But why only for a season? Do i get them forever if i buy them seperaty? It doesnt make sense.
So i somehow get the concept of a season pass on console shootbangs, but this one? So you save 3 dollars if you buy them all together? But why only for a season? Do i get them forever if i buy them seperaty? It doesnt make sense.
Now, there's something why I would actually want Iwata to leave. Day 1 DLC is bullshit, couldn't care less about the season pass though.
So i somehow get the concept of a season pass on console shootbangs, but this one? So you save 3 dollars if you buy them all together? But why only for a season? Do i get them forever if i buy them seperaty? It doesnt make sense.
Season passes are permanent, bundled purchases. There is no game, to my knowledge, where it's a limited-time rental. It's just a name for a bundled product. The name came from tv shows being sold online, where "season pass" meant "pay now and get each episode as soon as it's posted for the whole season." Those were also purchases, not rentals. For games it just became "get all of the current series of dlc for a lump sum at release." I think some games might have done multiple passes over many many months.
I guess it is. Still seems like a good deal to me, considering the lower RRP....isn't that usually how Season Passes work? Pre-buy the DLC and in the end it'll be cheaper than if you bought it piece-meal?
Oh I see. As long as it's not pay-to-unlock on-cartdridge content I guessFrom everything I understand the games been finished for quite a while and was only delayed to fit the release schedule timing it's hitting so day 1 DLC is understandable if they wanted to support the game (which I'm happy about)
...I can't seriously be the only one who doesn't care at all about the Season Pass, yet is freaking out over Gold Mario.
Like, seriously? Fuck that shit.
...I can't seriously be the only one who doesn't care at all about the Season Pass, yet is freaking out over Gold Mario.
Like, seriously? Fuck that shit.
Dude, every season pass is just a bundle of upcoming DLC with a discount applied. If this was called 'The Happy Rainbow Love Pack', people would still know it was a season pass.Thx for the replies. So the names is just nonsense. Buy a ticket for a season and play forever. Yeah, just call it a bundle then. Without this confusing name we wouldn´t even have the fake outrage in this thread. They are doing discounted bundles for some time now, this is in no way new. Just the stupid name is.
...I can't seriously be the only one who doesn't care at all about the Season Pass, yet is freaking out over Gold Mario.
Like, seriously? Fuck that shit.
Yeah I don't really care for the character either. I'm never going to use him or Toadette. I'm mainly in it for the courses....I can't seriously be the only one who doesn't care at all about the Season Pass, yet is freaking out over Gold Mario.
Like, seriously? Fuck that shit.
Now, there's something why I would actually want Iwata to leave. Will it really have day one dlc?
Yes I'm sure he personally made the decision to do this and it wouldn't have happened if he wasn't there.
Isn't he the one generally maligned for keeping them in the past and not bringing them into the internet age?
What, just because he's gold he's automatically better?Eh, he's better than Metal Mario.
What, just because he's gold he's automatically better?
That's some ore-based racism, man....
oreism?
What, just because he's gold he's automatically better?
That's some ore-based racism, man....
Gold Mario has Midas balls. Midas balls > invincibility.
Gold Mario has Midas balls. Midas balls > invincibility.
According to you around 2012
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=39747096&postcount=152
You were also strongly against Day 1 DLC
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=40517266&postcount=7
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=41610224&postcount=129
Double standards for the win!
We got Metal Mario in Mario Kart, why not Gold Mario in Mario Golf?
See, I can readily admit I can't really argue with that, and yet my own bias (my undying love for SM64/indifference to NSMB2) puts what are essentially costume swaps (no, really, that's just the MK7 model for Metal Mario except it's now gold) on two very separate tiers of importance.
Given the tsunami of hate Metal Mario got after his MK7, I guess I'm just surprised people are shrugging this off? Just goes to show where my priorities lie lmfao
I'm not against DLC but I likely won't actually get to this for a while and wanna avoid the gray zone where I buy it later, get the DLC and a couple months later a GotY comes out. Any precedence with Nintendo for having GotYs?
Yeah, I can't refute this. It's only ANNOYING when there are people who insist on this as if it were a universal truth and seemingly have a blind spot to games that are better as complete, solitary works, and only really BAD when the value isn't good for what you get, and I have blamed Microsoft in the past for setting that tone with implied policies of theirs (see: L4D DLC pricing, Sleeping Dogs DLC being $5 then suddenly jumping to $7 the next day when it hits XBL.) Nevermind that there's admittedly grey areas anyway: L.A. Noire kept some cases off because they couldn't be fit onto all the discs (though that's fuel for 360 vs PS3 in and of itself) and while getting those for free probably would've been ideal the season pass wasn't THAT expensive for what you got and again Microsoft's policies likely came into play, nevermind it being an expensive as hell game, and while the true ending for Asura's Wrath was held as DLC that did sound like another case of not fitting on the disc, may've needed continued work, and was entertaining enough to be forgiven by a lot of people.DLC is an absolutely fine concept when priced right and conservative Nintendo exclusive gamers will come to understand and appreciate this if Nintendo doesn't screw over their customers. $15 for 108 holes across six "courses" alongside new characters sounds fine to me. Less fine if (when) the price is hiked locally on my end of the world. But affordable nonetheless, with what sounds like a lot of content.
As Valve has argued many games are better suited to "services" instead of isolated products. Games like Mario Golf perfectly fit this, evolving in available content for the end user instead of locked to content with a single release, the only alternative to release entirely new bulk versions of the games. Content evolution from a single product instead of endless sequels. The balance that must be struck is content in the initial release with affordability and perceived value of upgrades/expansion/DLC. But it can and, under the right leadership, should be done.
For example, much like Mario Golf give me a Mario Kart that has me playing new tracks with new characters, with my friends locally and online, 12+ months after release. Keep me coming back. Keep evolving the product.
Do you count ports years if not decades later to other systems? Maybe collections that include said ports? Otherwise no, not really from what I've seen.I'm not against DLC but I likely won't actually get to this for a while and wanna avoid the gray zone where I buy it later, get the DLC and a couple months later a GotY comes out. Any precedence with Nintendo for having GotYs?
Isn't this the ideal situation for those who do not wish to spend extra money? Instead of the game being $45, or just never getting the extra content, those who wish to pay for content can do so.Mario Golf DLC - No problem.
Season Pass offer - No problem.
Day one DLC - Go fuck yourselves Nintendo.
I'm not against DLC but I likely won't actually get to this for a while and wanna avoid the gray zone where I buy it later, get the DLC and a couple months later a GotY comes out. Any precedence with Nintendo for having GotYs?
I'm not against DLC but I likely won't actually get to this for a while and wanna avoid the gray zone where I buy it later, get the DLC and a couple months later a GotY comes out. Any precedence with Nintendo for having GotYs?
I'm not against DLC but I likely won't actually get to this for a while and wanna avoid the gray zone where I buy it later, get the DLC and a couple months later a GotY comes out. Any precedence with Nintendo for having GotYs?
Nope.Any precedence with Nintendo for having GotYs?
They did get one for A Link Between Worlds from Gamespot last year.Nope.
....oh, you mean a re-released game with DLC included. Still nope.
Any precedence with Nintendo for having GotYs?