LiquidSolid
Member
Fuck Nintendo tho.
Nintendo has advertisements?
Fuck Nintendo tho.
Sounds like they took a lesson from the gaming communityThe focus on numbers is crazy! It's like the marketing department just went "we need numbers, numbers, numbers!"
I just wish Microsoft brought it with the system power, because they're doing pretty good bringing the games.
It's like the console power this generation is inversely proportional to quality of exclusive output so far. Nintendo winning exclusive quality with weakest system, Xbox in the middle, Sony having strongest system that needs to up its exclusive quality game. MCC might be old games, but what a fucking compelling package they've put together.
(I think Bloodbourne is going to bring it though.)
Why do you have to pick "sides" (whether sarcastic or not).
Its a goddamn list of video games. I understand people arguing the semantics, but why are so many people salty over it being posted? Boggles my mind.
They have always counted Exclusives as games between XB1 and PS4 that are only available on XB1
Yep, that's certainly an advertisement.
Can't say I'm surprised by who the topic creator is, either.
Still, can it play Vib Ribbon?
We know you prefer Ps4 guy.
It's just kinda strange for someone to link an infographic/ad made by a company just so "potential console buyers might want to see what" they can get. Basically acting as a sales person
It's just kinda strange for someone to link an infographic/ad made by a company just so "potential console buyers might want to see what" they can get. Basically acting as a sales person
Why woudnt you count LBP?I mean we can't say they are lying about exclusives since their competitor only has one exclusive this fall, two it you count LBP.
3 exclusive titles is hardly a reason for me to spend $500 on an xbox one
woah xbox Is certainly delivering with all these games.
first time this gen Im going to have TOO MANY games to get through.
Hope sony can pick up the ball
Whether this impression was true or not interested me, so I went and counted up exclusive U.S. retail releases per quarter since launch for PS4 and One.To be fair to Sony, they do a much better job of spreading out their exclusives. InFamous, MLB The Show, Transistor, Last of Us, Velocity 2X, Final Fantasy XIV and others all already came and went. For a good portion of the year, Microsoft's only big exclusive was Titanfall.
PS4 One
Q4 '13 2 5
Q1 '14 3 1
Q2 '14 2 1
Q3 '14 2 1
Q4 '14 3 5
.Yep, that's certainly an advertisement.
Can't say I'm surprised by who the topic creator is, either.
What because there are no exclusives on the PS4?
I have far more exclusive games for my PS4 than I have on my Xbox One. And that's nothing to do with the fact that I just got my Xbox one last week.
Besides the 2 Forza games there are no exclusives that interest me that have come out so far.
Its all dependant on tastes.
Whether this impression was true or not interested me, so I went and counted up exclusive U.S. retail releases per quarter since launch for PS4 and One.
Note that I have used the loosest possible definition of "exclusive" here: it counts even if it's on PC, or another machine by the same company. I did this because even with such wide latitude, the absolute numbers are still very low; being even more restrictive drops the data into the realm of noise. But of course feel free to re-compare more rigidly if you're so inclined.
That said, here's the data:
Code:PS4 One Q4 '13 2 5 Q1 '14 3 1 Q2 '14 2 1 Q3 '14 2 1 Q4 '14 3 5
The hypothesis seems pretty strongly supported. (Caveats about small sample size, etc.) Microsoft have gone all out for the holidays, with a minimal schedule for the nine months between. Sony have spread exclusives out far more evenly. This could be coincidence, but it's intriguing to think that it showcases two different strategies.
woah xbox Is certainly delivering with all these games.
first time this gen Im going to have TOO MANY games to get through.
Hope sony can pick up the ball
Uhhh... Tell that to the two first-party Victorian era third person action games dropping in the same month.Sony do a good job of ensuring their 1st party games are not competing with each other and have the best chance of success.
Uhhh... Tell that to the two first-party Victorian era third person action games dropping in the same month.
Sony do a good job of ensuring their 1st party games are not competing with each other and have the best chance of success.
Uhhh... Tell that to the two first-party Victorian era third person action games dropping in the same month.
I mean we can't say they are lying about exclusives since their competitor only has one exclusive this fall, two it you count LBP.
Buy D4 please!
Not counting LBP3 because it is also on the PS3 eh?
Yeah I sure am a PS4 fan, right along with my 360 and Wii and future Xbone and Wii U. It's not nice to assume you know.
Sony can't even launch the single exclusive it has properly.
You mean like every OT thread ever?It's just kinda strange for someone to link an infographic/ad made by a company just so "potential console buyers might want to see what" they can get. Basically acting as a sales person
It's just kinda strange for someone to link an infographic/ad made by a company just so "potential console buyers might want to see what" they can get. Basically acting as a sales person
I'm not sure that's really it. Those large year-end pulses of One exclusives are in diverse styles/genres: Kinect games, racers, FPS, action, etc. I doubt they really compete all that much for the same audience.Sony do a good job of ensuring their 1st party games are not competing with each other and have the best chance of success.
Is Bloodbourne considered first party?Uhhh... Tell that to the two first-party Victorian era third person action games dropping in the same month.
Is Bloodbourne considered first party?
I didn't think it was.