I Stalk Alone
Member
Ok so this is the stuff we should have got in 2005. We are finally getting somewhere. A freesync option at a cheaper price would be great in the future as an option.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Acer XB270HU monitor review (144Hz 1440p IPS G-sync)
- Thread starter Durante
- Start date
Gurgelhals
Member
I've noticed that most (all?) G-Sync capable displays only offer one single DisplayPort input. Is this a limitation of the G-Sync hardware? I am actually considering getting a G-Sync capable display, but I have two PCs at my desk (one is a gaming PC the other a Mac mini for everyday stuff / work) so I need a display with at least two inputs. 1440p IPS only, of course. I guess I'm out of luck there, ain't I? :-/
Finally glad IPS is catching up makes me happy about my next pc or monitor when I decide to upgrade. Shame they don't have an amd version but that's more on amd not the monitor industry.
Pricewise not happy but I tend to wait till these things get reasonable before I care flat panels still have many faults to buy above 400$
Pricewise not happy but I tend to wait till these things get reasonable before I care flat panels still have many faults to buy above 400$
I believe there is one in the cards with the exact same panel, just needed some more time in the oven due to the newer standard.
Objectively Bad Opinion
Member
Asus announced a 1440p IPS monitor with high refresh rates at CES. Last we heard it was 120Hz but Asus was "still working on certifying 144Hz ready for launch". It wasn't Freesync-branded, but supports DP 1.2a and Adaptive Sync.
It probably uses the same panel as this.
Dreams-Visions
Member
remarkable results. will strongly consider.
edit: no I won't. 72% color gamut is no bueno.
edit: no I won't. 72% color gamut is no bueno.
Holy shit!
That's what I like to see in a review. 
Looks like a great monitor, if I wasn't attempting to hold out for a 4K display with similar characteristics, I would strongly consider this one. Monitors have been on a recent incline of rapid advancements, but I wonder how long until something like a 4K, 120Hz+, G-sync, and VA (or IPS) is viable.
Looks like a great monitor, if I wasn't attempting to hold out for a 4K display with similar characteristics, I would strongly consider this one. Monitors have been on a recent incline of rapid advancements, but I wonder how long until something like a 4K, 120Hz+, G-sync, and VA (or IPS) is viable.Worse than other IPS panels?
RenegadeXV8
Banned
There is a FreeSync version set to release soon: http://hothardware.com/news/acer-confirms-amd-freesync-support-for-27-inch-xg270hu-gaming-monitor
This article states the panel its IPS but others claim it's TN. Overclockers UK has a pre-order up and it's £250 cheaper than the G-Sync version, so I'm more inclined to believe in a TN panel. That said, it does have more input options and the price difference is pretty massive, so it could be a really solid alternative.
Hellshingu
Member
Glad I didn't jump on the ROG when it was released. But I think I'm going to wait on this one too at least until this tech is more available and I won't be dropping $800 on a monitor I still need to upgrade my 680SC first.
michaelius
Banned
Yes it probably uses same panel but it will use diffrent electronics and from what we know so far it only dynamically changes frequency in 40-120 Hz and lacks strobing mode. That might also mean diffrent overdrive setting and input lag.
It's TN screen and it also lacks strobing mode and since it likely uses swift panel it will probably have heavy matte coating
Objectively Bad Opinion
Member
That's true. I assume however that since it is a gaming-branded Asus monitor it should be alright in the electronics and input lag department. This isn't Asus' first rodeo.
The loss of the strobing mode hurts though, but nothing we can do about that...
opticalmace
Member
Wonder how much it will be in CAD. And the Freesync version too, for that matter.
TyphoonStruggle
Member
I really want a VA as my next monitor as well, Durante. I'm just worried that VA may have problems with ULMB, do you think that's the case?
CarbonFire
Member
Compared to good IPS displays? Much worse. That's more in line with an average TN panel, which leads me to believe they had to cut some corners somewhere in order to get this panel performing as well as it is.
Kind of unfortunate. I'm looking to replace my 1080p 120hz BenQ with a 2k IPS Gsync panel, but with such a low color gamut, I'm not sure it's worth the upgrade. Especially if it comes in at $600-700
I guess I'll wait for reviews to see how it stacks up to other IPS screens.EroticSushi
Member
Any info on a PO date and price for the US? Been thinking about buying a new monitor.
Compared to good IPS displays? Much worse. That's more in line with an average TN panel, which leads me to believe they had to cut some corners somewhere in order to get this panel performing as well as it is.
Kind of unfortunate. I'm looking to replace my 1080p 120hz BenQ with a 2k IPS Gsync panel, but with such a low color gamut, I'm not sure it's worth the upgrade. Especially if it comes in at $600-700
So then what does this have over TN panels then? Better viewing angles?
ThoseDeafMutes
Member
I'm only really into multiples of 1080p so I'm not going to upgrade my AOC 1080p G-sync pannel until I can get 4k 144hz IPS with g-sync or whatever is the standard for my future video card. Hopefully it won't all be quite as pricey in a year or two when this is possible, lol.
SliChillax
Member
In 2-3 years there better be a 34 inch 21:9 VA 120hz (or above) monitor with Gsync and a vertical resolution of 2160p.
Gentleman Jack
Member
Am I wrong to be unhappy with 16:9?
Schrade
Member
opticalmace
Member
USD? Link?
People probably said the same thing about 16:10, coming from 4:3.
I've only seen them priced at 750 pounds. Considering the conversion rate, that would be good for us.
SliChillax
Member
16:10 feels wrong to me, depends on the person.
Looking at other panels on the site, ~72% NTSC looks pretty standard. Weird that it doesn't have a number for sRGB though.
Edit: looking at the calibration pictures, it looks like it's got sRGB covered.
CarbonFire
Member
Ok, that sounds a bit better. Will wait for reviews on color accuracy once it finally ships.
16:10 monitors are nice because they tend to just tack some pixels onto the top and bottom of standard 16:9 resolutions. I don't mind using my 2560x1600 monitor in 2560x1440 mode at all.
You probably want to take a look at this beauty then. It's a great time to be in the market for a new screen right now
.truthiness
Member
This monitor looks amazing. Hopefully we can get a solid release date and price for the U.S. soon!
The ROG Swift is still $1000 in Australia, which is going to make this baby even more expensive.
To be honest I would much rather a 24" 1080p monitor. Why don't they make one of those instead? At 27" it just means I sit further away, plus 27" at 1440p is more or less the same PPI as 24" at 1080p.
The best thing about this panel then is that it is the only 144Hz IPS G-Sync panel around.... I suppose it will have to do but that price tag is going to hurt!
Also do you guys reckon a GTX970 would be good enough to run most games at high quality at 1440p and >60fps? A GTX980 is like $800 in Australia and really expensive but a Gigabyte GTX970 G1 is $500.
To be honest I would much rather a 24" 1080p monitor. Why don't they make one of those instead? At 27" it just means I sit further away, plus 27" at 1440p is more or less the same PPI as 24" at 1080p.
The best thing about this panel then is that it is the only 144Hz IPS G-Sync panel around.... I suppose it will have to do but that price tag is going to hurt!
Also do you guys reckon a GTX970 would be good enough to run most games at high quality at 1440p and >60fps? A GTX980 is like $800 in Australia and really expensive but a Gigabyte GTX970 G1 is $500.
ThoseDeafMutes
Member
Try Amazon.com. Not sure how much damage the exchange rate has done. 750 for a 980 shipped, I think. If the dollar goes up a bit over the next few weeks you might get a better deal. But their customer service is top tier. I grabbed my 970 from them when the dollar was stronger.
I said god dayumn. I might need this.
PlayALLtheGames
Banned
I've been waiting, patiently, for many months for a new monitor to impress me and I'm trying to get something for GTA V.
This might be it.
I have a Dell U3011 and U3014 in perfect condition to sell that would easily cover the cost.
Just wish it was 30"
This might be it.
I have a Dell U3011 and U3014 in perfect condition to sell that would easily cover the cost.
Just wish it was 30"
ive been debating getting it from Amazon, the prices are so much better especially for a GTX970!
Living in Malaysia at the moment, it would be a bit of a hassle to get it shipped especially if for whatever reason I need to return it. I don't want to wait 4 weeks to get my product back. I prefer to get whatever I need in Malaysia (or Australia when I go back in July).
I'm on a 27" 2560x1440 with a GTX 970 and Most games I've tried still run at 60fps just fine. For the few that don't, lower resolutions like 1080p still upscale surprisingly well.
I went from a 24" to a 27" and I'd say the size and resolution increase is pretty great.
That's great to know. Thanks!
My mind boggles at the size of desk I need to get for a 27" monitor (if the 27" iMac ones are anything to go by...)
SneakyStephan
Banned
Wow that blurbusters picture is really impressive with the normal overdrive setting.
I'm guessing it'll have some silly price though :\
I fucking HATE my new monitor, piece of shit is worse than I ever imagined it could be, I want something better.
virtually 0 input lag (do people in this thread really still not know the difference between input lag and response time? ) is perfect for shooters.
Is there even a cpu out atm that can run every game at 144fps though (with lowered settings)? I always wonder that with these refresh rates.
My shitty phenom II can't even manage much more 30 in many modern games
My ideal monitor would still be 1200 or 1440p, 120hz, NOT sample and hold and something that doesn't need overdrive to produce a sharp image.(so not even oled would be that )
I'm guessing it'll have some silly price though :\
I fucking HATE my new monitor, piece of shit is worse than I ever imagined it could be, I want something better.
virtually 0 input lag (do people in this thread really still not know the difference between input lag and response time? ) is perfect for shooters.
Is there even a cpu out atm that can run every game at 144fps though (with lowered settings)? I always wonder that with these refresh rates.
My shitty phenom II can't even manage much more 30 in many modern games
My ideal monitor would still be 1200 or 1440p, 120hz, NOT sample and hold and something that doesn't need overdrive to produce a sharp image.(so not even oled would be that
)