I think porting Bloodborne to other platforms doesn't bring Sony as many as financial benefits as porting Street Fighter V. In addition, Bloodborne is their killer app after all and they can't risk killing their system seller just for the sake of a small portion of audiences on other platforms.
insomniac own the Sunset IP. Meanwhile, From Software don't own Bloodborn IP. Sony do.
Got it.
if 2nd party doesn't exist, why is the 2nd term 3rd party. 1st party --> 3rd party.
word, well it will be Ps4's first killer app hopefully. and the guy above you said a sony dev is also helping with developing.
is the general consensus that demon souls > dark souls?
I prefer it but I played it first... seems like the guys that played Dark Souls first prefer it over Demon's Souls.
Maybe some people take your post as an attack to console gaming. As I see it, your post clearly only stating the obvious fact. PC gaming revenue of course larger due to MMO and MOBA where there is monetization that possible to reap profits from piracy ridden third world market. Console and PC market is avery different landscape right now. Just becausr PC have bigger revenue that doesn't mean ut automatically better market for all developer to thrive in.
No, it's a even split. Also to answer your previous qurstion why people petitioning Bloodborne to come to PC, Demon's Souls didn't exist for them. A lot of gaming as a scrnr also tend to forget DeS and gives all the credit instead (name dropping Dark Souls as source of inspiration for example).
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=296026
I see, but it's not like a tr - uncharted scenario is it?
is that possibly because there was no consensus? it's divided?
was it split like the Me2vsUc2 thread? Because I remember that although Uc2 won, it was by no means on a landslide. The poll's less popular choice still was a very very large minority.
He's absolutely right
And speaking of which, I wonder what role Japan Studio take during the development (besides funding). As From Software were able to develop Souls game on many different platforms just fine last-gen, I find it weird when they have to seek Sony's helps in Bloodborne's development. I think they (From) can totally handle the development on their ownI have no idea. But considering all the Soul game run at 30 fps on consoles, I don't find Bloodborne running at 30 fps on PS4 strange.
From Software is not very good at this. They couldn't even make constant 30 FPS on their previous games, so we can't ask them too much.
Damn that would give them like 20.200008! Tell your 10 friends not to hold out anymore.
but I thought that was why SCEJ was helping to develop. Optimizing the production process
why would they offer any assistance for dark souls? seeing as how that game was multiplat
when you wrote "they didn't help with none of dark souls" i thought you meant that they did offer some assistance on those games, but I was unsure why if the game was multiplat.
Should be handy when PS4 hit 30 million units sold.
Should be handy when PS4 hit 30 million units sold.
Apparently Sony didn't need to provide a killer IP this generation to fulfill the needs of the masses. 20.5 million units and still no first party games worth a shit would seem to debunk the "games" argument as well as the "exclusive" argument in the same breath.
