Secret Fawful
Member
If the entire movie is stuff like the train bit, it'll be great. If not, it'll be lame. Every serious bit looks terrible.
mix of
Reminds me of:
&
for me.
I wonder what kind of sequel plans Doctor Strange and Ant-Man will have. I mean, if we follow the current plans, unless they integrate the character into other films and Avengers flicks, we won't get a sequel for a good five or six years... if ever (Incredible Hulk).
Oh my god, Yellowjacket's design is amazing. May have to grab his eventual Hot Toys release.
If this is a comedy (and it seems to be a comedy) why aren't they selling it as a comedy?
This is the same studio that made Guardians of the Galaxy a thing. Why can't they establish a coherent tone for this film? Especially when the tone they seem to be working very hard to build keeps getting undercut by the fact the movie is actually a comedy?
I'm sure the movie will be entertaining as hell. But they are not selling it very well.
If this is a comedy (and it seems to be a comedy) why aren't they selling it as a comedy?
This is the same studio that made Guardians of the Galaxy a thing. Why can't they establish a coherent tone for this film? Especially when the tone they seem to be working very hard to build keeps getting undercut by the fact the movie is actually a comedy?
I'm sure the movie will be entertaining as hell. But they are not selling it very well.
The big money shot of the trailer ends with a silly visual gag, how are they not selling this as a comedy?
I imagine the super serious tone and the epic grand soundtrack are intentional since they immediately contrast it with some mundane stuff. The serious speech about redemption by Pym, making Lang ready to reform, followed by Scott Lang needed to break in and steal something.It looks like the tone of the movie isn't very well reflected in these trailers. There are jokes, though it's possible that's just a product of Rudd's delivery since he's used to being in purely comedic films.
I get the impression that marvel knows how goofy this all seems at first and aren't confident they can hook people with the comedy so they've focused more on action and spectacle for the trailer. They could always do a more light hearted one later.
This looks tragic. I just can't take it seriously.
Probably part of the theme of the movie, even though you're small, and have a silly name, you can still have epic grand adventure.
I don't know how you can look at that trailer and not see another home run for Marvel.
We said that with Guardians of the Galaxy - best to give it a shot if you're a marvel fan.
Sadly he had haters as well.GotG had James Gunn though.
People gotta work hard to keep justifying their preconceived judgements.I don't know how you can look at that trailer and not see another home run for Marvel.
People gotta work hard to keep justifying their preconceived judgements.
I don't know how you can look at that trailer and not see another home run for Marvel.
You realize you just said this and quoted tobor right?
Reminds me of:
If this is a comedy (and it seems to be a comedy) why aren't they selling it as a comedy?
This is the same studio that made Guardians of the Galaxy a thing. Why can't they establish a coherent tone for this film? Especially when the tone they seem to be working very hard to build keeps getting undercut by the fact the movie is actually a comedy?
I'm sure the movie will be entertaining as hell. But they are not selling it very well.
Just because the trailer has 3 jokes in it doesn't mean the trailer is selling a comedy. It should be selling a comedy. Instead it's trying to sell people an action movie with Paul Rudd.
I was nervous about the movie until this trailer.
Maybe it's because they're trying to sell a movie that's being pulled in two different directions by two completely different visions: the former director's and the studio's.
We said that with Guardians of the Galaxy
That movie wasn't being sold like this one was. It appealed because it didn't seem to really want you to take it seriously.
This trailer (and the last one) wants you to take it seriously - when it's not taking jabs at the fact it's asking you to take something called Ant-Man seriously.
I guess what's bugging me is this is the first real Marvel ad campaign that feels out-of-date/out-of-place. It's selling a superhero movie to an audience saturated with superheroes, by essentially apologizing for the silliness of its premise. This is what superhero movies USED to do all the time. "Yes, we know. Yellow spandex. But I promise you there's cool stuff in here. Trust us."
They don't need to do that anymore. And Marvel, especially, doesn't need to strike that tone. Especially after the success they had with Guardians.
"Fuck you, it's Ant-Man. You're going to fucking love it. Look at this goofy shit. It's awesome."
That should be the thrust. But instead it's "You should like this. It looks like a serious superhero movie. Okay, yeah, it's Ant-Man. But it's still a 'real' superhero movie, so dont' sweat that it's Ant-Man."
Maybe it's because they're trying to sell a movie that's being pulled in two different directions by two completely different visions: the former director's and the studio's.
A question about Yellowjacket (potential spoilers for the movie):
Does the Yellowjacket suit drive Cross insane? Or is he just an out-ant-out bad guy?
I don't know man. After Marvel's current streak (Cap 2, GotG, and DD) maybe I had my hopes set too high.
Not sure why the former director's vision is in play here.
By all interviews, the new director and Paul Rudd made it a lot more about "comedy" than whatever Wright had written.
If they aren't using entire chunks of Wright's movie in this version, I'll eat real ants. I'll shove my face in an anthill. I'll let them pour down my throat. I can make the most ridiculous demands on myself imaginable, because THERE'S NO WAY IN HELL THEY AREN'T.
Of course they will use some pieces, but what I am saying is that they would not choose those pieces if they didn't fit into their vision. They are not just going to shoehorn in something Wright had just because.
It just doesn't make sense to say that the promotional material is at odds with itself because of Wright and the studio.
A question about Yellowjacket (potential spoilers for the movie):
Does the Yellowjacket suit drive Cross insane? Or is he just an out-ant-out bad guy?
"YOU THINK YOU CAN STOP THE FUTURE? YOU'RE JUST A THING!"
What? lol
"YOU THINK YOU CAN STOP THE FUTURE? YOU'RE JUST A THING!"
What? lol