• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Movies You've Seen Recently |OT| April 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.

hal9001

Banned
The Last Castle
Alright prison drama that leans towards the more implausible. Robert Redford and James Gandolfini rivalry saves the films. Some interesting cinematography.

Also did you guys know that apparently The Church of Satan has their very own recommended list of essential films to watch. Check it out for the laughs (not bad I might add):

http://www.churchofsatan.com/sources-film-list.php
 

Borgnine

MBA in pussy licensing and rights management
Cocoon: 5/10. Contains some of the most terrifying sci-fi imagery ever filmed. Also pretty stupid.
K-PAX: 4/10. The central conceit seems to be "what if an alien came to Earth and he really was an alien?" Which I suppose is better than "what if an alien came to Earth and got in a fight?" But still, really lame.
Mommy: 7/10. nicholsonyes.gif
Battle Royale: 8/10. One of those super popular movies I never got around to seeing. Totally cool. And I'm not even going to bring up Hunger Games even though I just did.
 
Beginners
I can see this one being almost too twee/00's indie flick for some, but I thought it was very genuine. Felt like modern emotions realized very well. Good performances and Plummer was particularly great. Loved the little drawings and random pictures throughout.

Side note: Melanie Laurent is to die for.

Love the fuck out of every moment in this movie.
 

graffix13

Member
Watched Interstellar over the weekend.

Honestly I was kind of let down. I love all of Nolan's movies but I wouldn't even put this in his Top 3.

I did enjoy the visuals and some of the story aspects, but overall it just didn't click. I dunno.
 
Watched Interstellar over the weekend.

Honestly I was kind of let down. I love all of Nolan's movies but I wouldn't even put this in his Top 3.

I did enjoy the visuals and some of the story aspects, but overall it just didn't click. I dunno.

Watch it again. It was the same for me when I saw it for first time
 

lordxar

Member
Cocoon: 5/10. Contains some of the most terrifying sci-fi imagery ever filmed. Also pretty stupid.
K-PAX: 4/10. The central conceit seems to be "what if an alien came to Earth and he really was an alien?" Which I suppose is better than "what if an alien came to Earth and got in a fight?" But still, really lame.
Mommy: 7/10. nicholsonyes.gif
Battle Royale: 8/10. One of those super popular movies I never got around to seeing. Totally cool. And I'm not even going to bring up Hunger Games even though I just did.

I really liked K-Pax. Had a pretty neat mind game.
 

dcelw540

Junior Member
It follows - it was a strange premise and honestly i did not know anything going into it. My friend told me it was getting great reviews and i thought sweet. Well the movie had potential even with the plot but it never did what i thought and that's not necessarily a bad thing. The beginning of the movie is a bit misleading as i thought it was going to some cool kills. Overall it was okay. You can tell it did not have a big budget and did the best with it but the thing is weak and the ending was quite erupt. 5.5/10
 

big ander

Member
Beginners
I can see this one being almost too twee/00's indie flick for some, but I thought it was very genuine. Felt like modern emotions realized very well. Good performances and Plummer was particularly great. Loved the little drawings and random pictures throughout.

Side note: Melanie Laurent is to die for.
Yea I think it's good. I wonder if Laurent is as loved in her home country as she is here, unlike the French apparently not understanding why we like Cotillard
Oh man I was planning on watching that one next. Is it nuts?
Maybe it was when it came out but by today's standards it's passé, I mean I can't remember the last time I saw a movie that DIDNT have a
carnivorous piano
(But nah watch it)
 
I wonder if Laurent is as loved in her home country as she is here, unlike the French apparently not understanding why we like Cotillard

Like for Cotillard a lot of exposure brought her a lot of negative attention. Both are very much loved by some and both are very much subjected to ridicule. Her performance in Inglorious Basterds in particular was so off (she even says she told Tarentino that her speech, although gramatically correct, sounded nothing like French. I don't know if that's true that but the result is indeed comical to a fault).

Laurent as a person often appears like a caricature of the gorgeous self absorbed and conceited French woman that is ironically so mocked outside of France.

A video compiling her "best" interview statements (Mélanie Laurent is curious of EVERYTHING) made the rounds a few months ago.

First and foremost, like Cotillard she's just not a very good actress. So yeah, like Cotillard a lot (but not all) French people seem a bit dumbfounded as why she is so loved abroad when there are dozens of better actresses around. But hey, same deal everywhere I guess.
 
Like for Cotillard a lot of exposure brought her a lot of negative attention. Both are very much loved by some and both are very much subjected to ridicule. Her performance in Inglorious Basterds in particular was so off (she even says she told Tarentino that her speech, although gramatically correct, sounded nothing like French. I don't know if that's true that but the result is indeed comical to a fault).

Laurent as a person often appears like a caricature of the gorgeous self absorbed and conceited French woman that is ironically so mocked outside of France.

A video compiling her "best" interview statements compilation (Mélanie Laurent is curious of EVERYTHING) made the rounds a few months ago.

First and foremost, like Cotillard she's just not a very good actress. So yeah, like Cotillard a lot (but not all) French people seem a bit dumbfounded as why she is so loved abroad when there are dozens of better actresses around. But hey, same deal everywhere I guess.

What?

La Vie en Rose
Two Days, One Night
The Immigrant.

Fantastic in all 3 of those.
 
What?

La Vie en Rose
Two Days, One Night
The Immigrant.

Fantastic in all 3 of those.

I have faith in Two Days, One Night. Lots of people who don't like her said they were impressed by that particular performance. I mean she's usually not terrible but not praiseworthy either. Haven't seen Rust and Bones and the Immigrant yet.

There're just loads of better French actresses around.
 
I have faith in Two Days, One Night. Lots of people who don't like her said they were impressed by that particular performance. I mean she's usually not terrible but not praiseworthy either. Haven't seen Rust and Bones and the Immigrant yet.

There're just loads of better French actresses around.

Perhaps the people that don't like her are the problem.
 

UrbanRats

Member
Yea I think it's good. I wonder if Laurent is as loved in her home country as she is here, unlike the French apparently not understanding why we like Cotillard

Her being the prettiest woman to walk the Earth may have something to do with it. ;)
But really, i didn't know she wasn't well liked as an actress, beyond the stupid DKR scene.

I think i liked her in everything i've seen her in, she was fine in the Immigrant (though i didn't like the movie) and good in 2 days 1 night.
 

Pachimari

Member
Himlen Falder
Just finished watching this movie at school and wow was it unexpectedly good. I usually don't watch Danish movies but this one was something else.

It's about a girl named Sara who goes back to her childhood place, were she pretends to be someone else in order to get close to her biological brother and father after having watched the funeral of her biological mother.

She learns her brother have become a Nazi and after being affected by drugs at a private Nazi party the brother and sister ends up having sex. It's not long until he discovers she is his real sister who he haven't seen for 17 years.

Much bigger things are to be discovered though. As Sara learns that she have two biological sister who are only children. She discovers that her father is selling them to his friend so they can enjoy sex with the two girls, just like he did with Sara when she were a child.

Everything evolves herd and though I would say the acting is generally not that good, the two girls are convincing and you feel for them, especially as the oldest of the two girls won't talk and tries keeping everything a secret, or else God will punish them and their father will kill them.

It's a slow and touching movie which I would recommend watching if you can find it with subtitles.

The director of the movie is here now, so we can interview him and ask him questions about the movie.
 

burnfout

Member
Lost River

I want to fund Gosling's next movie, because the dude shows that he has got the talents. Stunning. 8/10


How bad is the violence against animals? Saw Chris Stuckman talking about that. Also if any real animals got hurt I won't see it at all.
 

Reckoner

Member
How bad is the violence against animals? Saw Chris Stuckman talking about that. Also if any real animals got hurt I won't see it at all.

The rat of Saoirse Ronan's character gets killed by Bully. But I can't believe that a real rat got killed there.
 

Divius

Member
Watch it again. It was the same for me when I saw it for first time
Rewatching Nolan movies has never worked out positively for me, except for The Prestige. That said, I'm planning on rewatching Interstellar although I doubt that is a smart thing to do :p
 

Borgnine

MBA in pussy licensing and rights management
Rewatching Nolan movies has never worked out positively for me

Rewatching Nolan always makes me like the parts I like more and dislike the parts I dislike more. Makes sense since if there's any way to describe his movies it's "uneven."
 

Ridley327

Member
It's time for another round of Ridley's Lightning Blurbs!

Lord of War: Vacation time began in earnest when I watched this while waiting for my brother to unpack and figure out what we were doing on Thursday night. I had seen this a couple of times before in the past, so I knew what to expect. It's a touch more unsubtle than I remembered it being (never use the song Cocaine when people are doing cocaine; NEVER), but Andrew Niccol definitely knows how to stage some impressive scenes (I've always loved the history lesson on the AK-47, as well as time lapse dismantling of the cargo plane), and the whole film carries a nice sheen to it that doesn't look like a whole lot else out there. Nic Cage gives a nicely understated performance as the lead, and I always appreciate it when a film about dark subject matter actually follows through with it in the conclusion.

Derailed: Certainly not primo Van Damme, and way too low-budget for its own good, but it's a compelling-enough watch, thanks to its rapid pacing and throwing enough twists into the story to keep things agreeably chaotic. The dedicated family man angle was a refreshing change for a Van Damme character, and certainly much more interesting than Tomas Arana's villain, who is basically doing a weak riff on John Lithgow's performance from Cliffhanger.

Ruthless People: Who knew that Zucker/Abrahams/Zucker had it in them for a comedy that wasn't a straight spoof? The film has the makings of being a much blacker comedy than it actually is, but I won't fault it too much for not making the big leap when it's still a good time. Danny DeVito is his wonderfully oily self, Judge Reinhold and Helen Slater make for a charming pair of crooks that are just too pure of heart to be real criminals (Reinhold's encounter with a spider was especially terrific), and Bill Pullman makes for one damn good mimbo. Bette Midler is pretty much Bette Midler, but I can't imagine her role calling for much more than that.

Hercules in New York: I celebrated my birthday with a movie I attempted to watch over 10 years ago, but forgot the reasons why I didn't go through with all of it. After an endless 92 minutes of zero momentum, charmless characters (Arnold was a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooong way away from the persona we've come to love and treasure him for), god awful lighting, and a grating score that will have you tearing out your ears, I found out why. I feel like a redo of my birthday is in order now.

Deadfall: After years of being amused endlessly by clips of Nic Cage's deranged performance, I finally saw the whole thing and appeared to find out that they were the highlights of an otherwise dull attempt at making a neo noir with a filmmaker whose sensibilities are more in sync with a slightly ambitious AV club student. The reliance on dark shadows suggests a noir-type feel, but it's really to hide the fact that everything takes place on a really bad-looking set, and the lead actors aren't given any help, leading to Michael Biehn becoming the world's most disinterested con man (both in his interactions with the other actors and his theatrical cut of Blade Runner-bad voice over), Sarah Trigger as a femme fatale that is constantly on the verge of bawling her eyes out, and James Coburn flashing a shit-eating grin as he assuredly recoiled in horror over where the script goes for his characters, as well as everyone else, since the whole thing is so goddamned pointless by the end. Thankfully, reliable old Angus Scrimm shows up and puts on a hell of a Sydney Greenstreet impression as the final mark (OR IS HE?!?) while wearing a prop that gives him a robotic scissor-hand because why not. The totality of the insanity of Nic Cage's performance helps keep it interesting enough in the face of straight-up bad filmmaking, but until Angus Scrimm shows up, there is a hell of a lull to endure when Cage's character makes his memorable exit. Truly, Cage was doing his brother a favor.

King Kong (1976): Surprisingly not nearly as bad as I was led to believe. If the biggest problem with Peter Jackson's take on the story is that he was too much of a fanboy to see how much his excesses was hurting the same story that the 1933 original had, this one was hurt by not diverting enough from the source material, as the film is surprisingly going for a more cynical criticism of society at the time of its making in its third act. Since it is a Dino De Laurentiis blockbuster, such lofty goals get waylaid in the pursuit of showing just how much money he spent on it, but to his credit, he certainly got some bang for his buck from the early, striking scenery shots of the island of our title character. Jeff Bridges plays Jeff Bridges, but that actually works pretty well, Charles Grodin proves to be decidedly uncomfortable when hamming it up, looking like one of those weird Russian-animated Tom & Jerry cartoons than the genuine article, and a rather fetching Jessica Lange seems to be really excited to be working on a big movie, smiling at every opportunity she gets when the camera is looking at her face and not one of her many wardrobe changes, which isn't nearly as irritating as you might think. I liked the expressiveness of the Kong mask that Rick Baker had to wear, but I don't think the effects crew really found a good way to ever make him look like anything other than a guy in a gorilla costume, which leads unintentionally humorous moments, like the over-reliance of rear projection effects while Jessica Lange is being fondled by a large prop right hand of Kong (he's kinda super horny in this version). As I mentioned, the film seems to want to get away from telling the same story, which can make for some jarring transitions when it does try to stick to it, such as the unannounced presence of equally oversized animals (well, just one) that isn't hinted at. And while it isn't nearly as long as Jackson's version, Kong gets captured in this film in roughly the same amount of time that the original was already heading into its conclusion, so pacing is an issue, if not quite as pronounced. Still, I have to commend it for trying to flip the script a bit and attempting a bit more of a downer ending that removes the romantic tragedy and replaces it a whole lot more acerbic sentiments, but the final title card before the credits start in earnest is a paragraph-long special thanks to the guys that worked on the special effects. That's a pretty good way to describe the film: just when you think it's going to embark on something a lot more daring and interesting, Dino De Laurentiis throws more money at problems that didn't need solving.
 

hal9001

Banned
Wild-Tales-poster.jpg

Wild Tales
My favourite film I have seen this year so far. I loved every minute of it and can not recommend it enough. It is basically an anthology film that is made up of six standalone stories united by a common theme of violence and vengeance. Tarantino would have loved to have made this film. Superb cinematography and screenplay. Every story was amazing and the last one brings it to a cathartic and satisfying conclusion.

Lost River
What a beautiful film to look at. Gosling channels his inner Malick, Lynch and Jodorowsky to give something very out there and dreamlike. There were some moments that I hated where I was ready to dismiss the whole film but then there were other times that you couldn't help but sit in awe at what was being shown. I'm not saying it's a masterpiece but it is something very unique that might become more appreciated in the future.
 

big ander

Member
Saw Exotica and Calendar last night. Former was great and only getting better with distance, at once endlessly complex and intimately comprehensible. latter was quite difficult. Rosenbaum's rave on it is illuminating but I don't see myself rewatching any time soon, or moving on to any other Egoyan films for a while still--he's #2 to Maddin on my list of longtime Canadian auteurs to catch up on
 

LuuKyK

Member
Wild Tales
My favourite film I have seen this year so far. I loved every minute of it and can not recommend it enough. It is basically an anthology film that is made up of six standalone stories united by a common theme of violence and vengeance. Tarantino would have loved to have made this film. Superb cinematography and screenplay. Every story was amazing and the last one brings it to a cathartic and satisfying conclusion.

Lost River
What a beautiful film to look at. Gosling channels his inner Malick, Lynch and Jodorowsky to give something very out there and dreamlike. There were some moments that I hated where I was ready to dismiss the whole film but then there were other times that you couldn't help but sit in awe at what was being shown. I'm not saying it's a masterpiece but it is something very unique that might become more appreciated in the future.

I REALLY want to watch both of these movies. Easily on top of my must watch list right now, especially Lost River, since I loved the trailed and the story seems really interesting. Too bad its not officially available in my country yet so I have to wait.
 

MikeMyers

Member
I Married a Witch (Rene Clair, 1943)

Thought this could have been a film about temptation, but by the way the film ended, I guess not?
 
Saw Exotica and Calendar last night. Former was great and only getting better with distance, at once endlessly complex and intimately comprehensible. latter was quite difficult. Rosenbaum's rave on it is illuminating but I don't see myself rewatching any time soon, or moving on to any other Egoyan films for a while still--he's #2 to Maddin on my list of longtime Canadian auteurs to catch up on

Even then, you should try watching The Adjuster. Calendar and for example also Ararat are not starter Egoyan movies imo, even if I love both.
 

Choomp

Banned
Enjoyed Breathless quite a bit for what it was. Liked the use of long, winding takes compared to some of the quickly edited sequences. It definitely got messy at points, but overall I liked it. Also really enjoyed the writing and the main character.
 
Furious 7 not as amazing (peaks early with the Azerbaijan setpiece) or as packed full of quality inventive action as Kingsman but packs a hella emotional send-off.

Mad Max has the chance to be the best action movie of the year.
 
A Fistful of Dollars (Leone, 1964) 3rd viewing

This was a lot more rough than I remember it being (the low budget shows). It's full of contrived scenarios (eg, the premise of the graveyard shootout is kind of laughable) and leaps of logic. Still, it's pretty enjoyable to watch. Compared to the other "Dollar" films it feels a lot more rugged, or more cynical, and the style of gun duels still holds up and laid the foundation for plenty of other films. Not quite as good as....

Yojimbo (Kurosawa, 1961) 2nd viewing

I'm sad to say that because I've seen fistful of dollars long before I've seen Yojimbo that I've always unfairly judged Yojimbo in comparison to Fistful. What doesn't work in Fistful (mostly the plot) works wonders here, and every aspect from the cinematography to atmosphere just feels so masterfully crafted.

For a Few Dollars More (Leone, 1965) 3rd Viewing

I think after recently re-watching all three "Dollar" films, For a Few Dollars more might be the most focused the three films. Most moments in the film feels like it has a place in either advancing the story or giving more character to the guys on show here. I especially like that there is a more personal relationship between the villain and one of the main characters that gets revealed at end. Out of the three films I prefer The Good the Bad and the Ugly just because as a moment to moment film, it has the best moments, but for once I sort of understand those who prefer For a Few Dollars More.
 
Watched I am Sam after it being recommended a lot in a feels thread a little while back. Made me cry like a little baby, no shame, 10/10.

Also watched The Road, saw it being recommended on the same feels thread, did not make me feel, 4/10.
I didn't like obvious pro Christianity agenda of the movie, flashbacks could've been handled better (maybe even not as flashbacks but as the begging of the movie), the catastrophe is never explained and my biggest problem with the movie was the boy, so annoying and girly they might as well have made the character an actual girl, it would have a bigger emotional impact IMO. What I did like about it was the survival aspects like low ammo for weapons, low food resources and the cannibalism outcome of that.
 

UrbanRats

Member
Also watched The Road [...] my biggest problem with the movie was the boy, so annoying and girly they might as well have made the character an actual girl, it would have a bigger emotional impact IMO. [...]
A very puzzling comment, for multiple reasons.

Also, not really a spoiler.
 

big ander

Member
What's everybody seeing this weekend? I'm off to a screening of some rare Argentinian noir or something, which sounded adventurous and fun enough that I pushed Hard to Be a God--which I'll see Sunday instead probably. And I'm thinking I'll try to get into a free screening of Hou's The Puppetmaster tomorrow.

Wendy and Lucy was decent--not very depthy though there's plenty of rigor in showing the millions of ways small and large the poor and homeless are exploited. Dogs should be eligible for acting awards
Fantastic Planet's a trip, strip it down to narrative and it's run-of-the-mill sci-fi pulp. Jeeze those visuals though. and Laloux's psyched out pacing, lingering on daily rituals and facts of life of these beings until they've sat long enough to vaguely, distantly resemble some banal act of ours, sharing a base impulse.
followed that up with the 15m Laloux short How Wang-Fo Was Saved, cause I noticed it was fairly recently uploaded to yt with english subs. I've seen some say this was Laloux's favorite of his work, which is sort of odd because it appears to be a very straight adaptation of a Marguerite Yourcenar short story and the animation here is quite a bit less expressive and surreal than in Fantastic Planet or Time Masters. it makes sense, though, given this is a parable about what art means to us. Some of it's kinda rote, sacraficial art and inescapable inspiration to create and people living on through art, yadda yadda. but the middle section flashback is awesome. Unique story of an emperor who, for ten years as a child, lived in isolation with nothing but Wang-Fo's art. and upon being freed he was disgusted to find the real world was garish in comparison. Through this acknowledgment of art's capacity to distort the short is more cynical than other "Art is Great" stories.
Even then, you should try watching The Adjuster. Calendar and for example also Ararat are not starter Egoyan movies imo, even if I love both.
I'll make the next one The Adjuster, that way I can continue to work backwards from Exotica.
Also watched The Road, saw it being recommended on the same feels thread, did not make me feel, 4/10. [[none of this is a] SPOILER]I didn't like obvious pro Christianity agenda of the movie, flashbacks could've been handled better (maybe even not as flashbacks but as the begging of the movie), the catastrophe is never explained and my biggest problem with the movie was the boy, so annoying and girly they might as well have made the character an actual girl, it would have a bigger emotional impact IMO. What I did like about it was the survival aspects like low ammo for weapons, low food resources and the cannibalism outcome of that.[/SPOILER]

-Why does the catastrophe need to be explained?
-pro Christianity? the movie and book are...sort of pro-faith (the concept, not necessarily faith in religion)--but only in that they portray faith as a necessary condition to keep yourself from falling in the void, and you're going to be swallowed up by incorrigible evil anyway. The movie does make that change at the end that alters that a bit, but not to the point that it's suddenly happy-go-Jesusy.
-yea, what the hell at the girly thing. You're weird dude.
 
big ander you mentioned some Hal Hartley shorts last page- How well versed are you? I've seen Surviving Desire, Trust, Simple Men, and Amateur, all of which I've enjoyed. I have Henry Fool, The Book of Life, Fay Grim, and Ned Rifle lined up next. Anything else I should get to? Am I missing any "must watch" material?
__________________________________________________________




Also, my Michael Mann-brehs, it looks like we might FINALLY be getting the Enzo Ferrari biopic by 2017. He's been trying to get this done for 25 years and the recent news is the closest it's come since him and Robert De Niro were about to make it in 1993. Oddly enough, De Niro is attached to a completely different Ferrari biopic which as of now doesn't have a director.
 
yeah I heard about that, DeNiro should move to Mann's project.

unless he has somebody better in mind for that casting

This is hilarious. Apparently, the producers behind De Niro's version are looking to Stephen J. Rivele and Chris Wilkinson to write it....y'know, 2 of the 4 credits on Ali. They really should just Captain Planet the whole thing with Mann's movie. Looks like Eastwood might do the De Niro one though. I know which I'd rather watch.
 

dekline

Member
any early opinions on Child 44? wanna know if it's worth seeing

I'm curious as well. I like the cast, and the story seems interesting, but the reviews rolling in are really poor. It seems like Citizen X is the better choice, though I have yet to see that.
 

Nuke Soda

Member
Maps to the Stars (2014)- This movie was flat. A flat story, flat characters, flat camera angels, it was not very exciting. Guess I was expecting a lot more from this David Cronenberg helmed satire. Stuff does happen story wise in the last 20 or so minutes, but it was too little too late.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom