• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mortal Kombat 2 vs. Mortal Kombat 3

scitek

Member
3 vanilla is kind of stripped of all character appeal and made absolutely obsolete by UMK3.

I never really cared for 2 though. I had it back in the day on the Genesis and was really excited to play it. But the AI felt even shittier to fight again, and it really wasn't the 2D fighter of choice for my friends either. People really like it, but between it and the first I generally prefer the first. Even though, mechanically, I know 2 is bette
2 is definitely the better game between just these tho. If we were talking UMK3 or even the clusterfuss that is Trilogy, it would be one of those.
I remember the SNES version of 2 shaming the Genesis version, which felt awesome as a SNES-only owner at the time. It was an awesome likeness. Especially after all the flack the first one got.
 

Weiss

Banned
Mortal Kombat 2 encapsulates everything great about the series. It's viscerally gory, colorful, has an awesome cast, and in a time where every fighting game was about karate dudes in tournaments, MK2 had a story about interdimensional warfare between a god tyrant of a hell dimension and the last bastion of Earth's warriors who had to travel to this alien land to save the world.

MK3 blows. Even UMK3 with its gameplay tweaking and return of iconic characters feels hollow compared to MK2. Everything was just too silly and cheaply made in that one.
 

Ryaaan14

Banned
This is a really difficult question but in my personal opinion MK2 is the perfect Mortal Kombat game. It was a much more exciting sequel without going overboard. MK3 was great but took it a LITTLE overboard.
 

Unicorn

Member
MK 2.

3 was a disappointment. Ultimate was a major improvement, but 2 seemed more apt for custom combos. 3 felt too dialed in.

I remember getting 3 on release and being disappointed. I was reluctant about Ultimate, but was sold after playing the arcade version.
 

Jaeger

Member
I wasn't sold on Robot/Cyborg Smoke. I mean, he was cool in concept. But even as a kid, all I saw was BMX gear. Same for the other cyborg ninjas.
 

EulaCapra

Member
Always preferred MKII. The music, character aesthetics, and settings give a sense of danger and mystique into Outworld.

I liked MK3 even though it's a different beast. It turned up and embraced the 90's cheese factor with the day-glow, urban settings, and music. It's definitely a product of its 90's times lol.

I mean, how do you not want to do the Bart Man while listening to the stage music?
TVNwkEW.gif
 

Paulie_C

Neo Member
Because sheeva is a scorpion

Wow thats even worse than if there was no scorpion in the game. Was scorpion not in vanilla MK3?

You can imagine the meeting..
Dev 1: "Right guys, Scorpion's animality is am easy win, its a scorpion."
Dev 2: "err...we already used a scorpion for Sheeva, we have to keep the existing canon."
1: "Animalities are canon? - Fuck, I had 1 minute assigned to Scorpion for this meeting. The game goes gold in a hour, quick - think of an animal!"
2: "Penguin?.."
1: "Are you fucking nuts?"
Silence for 30 seconds.
1: "Penguin it is."
 
MK2 by far is the best. MK3 is like they went after the ADD crowd with the silly running. MK2 seems really simplistic on the surface, but it's not
 
I hope that the next MK brings back digitized actors. With todays technology it would probably look amazing!

As for the topic, MK2 over normal MK3. Theres just not contest, thats why UMK3 was created.
 

Culex

Banned
I preferred the SNES version of 2 over the arcade, but MKIII in the arcade trumped all the console version IMO.
 
MK3 was a pretty big step back from MK2. Hype was sky high before release with all sorts of rumours floating about, but then when it hit arcades the prevailing sentiment was "meh".

Good:
- MK3 introduced some great characters (Cabal, the cyber ninjas)
- Plenty of secrets
- Faster pace overall

Bad:
- Some fucking terrible new characters (Stryker)
- Removal of many characters
- Not nearly as atmsopheric, less mysterious, worse music

UMK3 was good fun, but that's really the game MK3 should have been at release.
 

Gono

Banned
Gimme MK2.

While the whole classic game series was cheesy as hell, MK2 had the 80's ninja B-movie feel perfectly done.

Better character designs, better fatalities, some of the best stages of all the series, a really eerie soundtrack which helped to build a total mysterious ambience and creepy atmosphere.

Ninja costumes were the best also.

MK3 on the other hand (and further entries like UMK3 and Trilogy) were completely over the top and lost the mythical, mysterious, and kinda "this is a serious gore game" tone that the first two had.
They had interesting additions in the gameplay and technical department and some pretty new cool characters, but nop, I don't think they were as good as MK2.
 

Jaeger

Member
I can go on all day about the graphics and art design in MK3. Some of the characters introduced are just terrible and lazy. Characters like Stryker. Until this day, I just don't care for him.
 

KingV

Member
exactly this. The juggles in MK2 were awesome.

I'm not sure why anybody would prefer "dial a combo". It sort makes the barrier to entry to skilled play memorizing long button chains. I seriously dislike that in fighting games. MK2 combos were based on stringing together moves in intuitive ways that could be deduced by familiarity with the moves with the 3 to 5 special moves each character has.
 
I'm not sure why anybody would prefer "dial a combo". It sort makes the barrier to entry to skilled play memorizing long button chains. I seriously dislike that in fighting games. MK2 combos were based on stringing together moves in intuitive ways that could be deduced by familiarity with the moves with the 3 to 5 special moves each character has.

Yeah, there seemed to be a much more focus on special moves in MK2 and chaining them together with your basic move set (sweet, kick, roundhouse, etc). It was just a lot simpler without the loss of depth than MK3.
 

Jaeger

Member
It seems most new characters after 2 were just plain awful. For every Sektor or Cyrax, we got a Stryker, Bo' Rai Cho, Hsu Hao, Kobra or Jarek.
 
MK3, once you ran you couldnt go back
To some extent this,but also I think for me it was a time and place thing.

For whatever reason as much as I loved MK2, MK3 just hit at a time when my friends and I were really into fighters and so, I think nostalgia plays a big role for me.

Also, Cyrax. Nets and bombs. So many nets and bombs.
 

Creaking

He touched the black heart of a mod
It seems most new characters after 2 were just plain awful. For every Sektor or Cyrax, we got a Stryker, Bo' Rai Cho, Hsu Hao, Kobra or Jarek.

Jarek provided us with the height of Mortal Kombat entertainment though.
 
Top Bottom