Dhar is cool in a minimalist way. It's also nice to have another sword normal character that doesn't wear a coat of some sort lol.She looks awesome
I want to play that character in a fighting game.
I'd say the impact is mostly at the bottom tier(s) for those guys. The commonly offered early bird tier may as well be the international tier for the overseas audience. Others who can't afford to give much have to pay more just for the $30 base tier and people who want the digital art compendium may have to pay overseas shipping for the physical game. Surprisingly this campaign has beaten the SG campaign in quite a few tiers.I've seen a lot of people mentioning the exchange rate, especially people from Brazil. But I'm still wondering if the dollar's relative strength right now is hurting all our international efforts.
We have been trying to engage Japanese fans, but it's tough with a new IP, as people have noted.
Japan has contributed over $28k so far, from 227 backers. So that's a fantastic average, but still less than they contributed for Skullgirls.
With Skullgirls, about 1000 Japanese backers contributed a combined $92k.
I've seen a lot of people mentioning the exchange rate, especially people from Brazil. But I'm still wondering if the dollar's relative strength right now is hurting all our international efforts.
Kikuta has been stumping for us pretty hard, so I'm a little surprised we're not doing more just because of that.
Oh dear god yes. FINALLY the sort of character design I've always wanted to see in a game but pretty much never get to. I really should up my pledge over this, finances permitting.
Edit: Is the physical game optional for the $75 tier now? Looks like it at a glance. Good of you guys to do that.
sweatingman.jpg
Oh dear god yes. FINALLY the sort of character design I've always wanted to see in a game but pretty much never get to. I really should up my pledge over this, finances permitting.
holy shit this is incredible
The tier charts in the OP and the IGG being slightly different from one another threw me off.No, and I'm confused why people keep asking this?
It's not mentioned in the tier box, it's not in the tier description / graphic, and it's not in the chart.
Character and body type = awesome
Oh dear god yes. FINALLY the sort of character design I've always wanted to see in a game but pretty much never get to. I really should up my pledge over this, finances permitting.
Character and body type = awesome
Armour design = awful and disappointing
Sorry Lab Zero, but... ugh. You were doing so well too...
Sorry, I disagree. It's not the sexualization per se it's how the outfit doesn't make any sense, like showing skin was the #1 priority in thinking it up. The breastplate, I don't know how it'd even stay on. She covers her legs and arms and hands but not her belly (a common stereotype). She wears armour directly on the skin too (a pet peeve of mine). What she's wearing doesn't even look comfortable.
It's not the worst I've ever seen, and at least she's not striking a dumb pose so points for that, but I still don't like it. You want to make a half-naked barbarian warrior, fine, how about this? Or this (example on the right)? There's more skin exposed but guess why I think they are better designs, because they make sense.
Funded
Oh dear god yes. FINALLY the sort of character design I've always wanted to see in a game but pretty much never get to. I really should up my pledge over this, finances permitting.
Usually, I'm against "Bikini Armor", but in this character's case I don't mind it and I think it's cool. It works and it doesn't feel stupid or sexualized.
Oh dear god yes. FINALLY the sort of character design I've always wanted to see in a game but pretty much never get to. I really should up my pledge over this, finances permitting.
Not digging it, unfortunately.
I can't speak for what Lime doesn't like about it, but I addressed that in my criticism above. I'd actually be totally fine with a loin cloth, at least that'd be comfy.I dunno. Conan running aroud topless and just wearing a loincloth.She looks pretty confident with what she wearing into battle. Also lets not forget that she's just a single character among a numerous cast with different body type and attire.
If that was everyone's thought process, we wouldn't respect 95% of video characters.I can't speak for what Lime doesn't like about it, but I addressed that in my criticism above. I'd actually be totally fine with a loin cloth, at least that'd be comfy.
The outfit is just dumb and I can't imagine any self-respecting warrior wearing this. The character design has been stellar and internally consistent so far so this is disappointing.
I can't speak for what Lime doesn't like about it, but I addressed that in my criticism above. I'd actually be totally fine with a loin cloth, at least that'd be comfy.
The outfit is just dumb and I can't imagine any self-respecting warrior wearing this. The character design has been stellar and internally consistent so far so this is disappointing.
Someone responsible for toning down the sexualization of the characters responded to comments on facebook, basically clarifying the design process behind her. (It's within character, archers don't typically need to be heavily armored vs mobile, boob plate is so she doesn't injure herself while firing, etc.)
Character and body type = awesome
Armour design = awful and disappointing
Sorry Lab Zero, but... ugh. You were doing so well too...
Oh dear god yes. FINALLY the sort of character design I've always wanted to see in a game but pretty much never get to. I really should up my pledge over this, finances permitting.
Someone responsible for toning down the sexualization of the characters responded to comments on facebook, basically clarifying the design process behind her. (It's within character, archers don't typically need to be heavily armored vs mobile, boob plate is so she doesn't injure herself while firing, etc.)
Love that power lifter physique!I'm ok with her design. Not exactly often that video games have that styling with that particular body-type for a female character.
I dunno. Conan running aroud topless and just wearing a loincloth.She looks pretty confident with what she wearing into battle. Also lets not forget that she's just a single character among a numerous cast with different body type and attire.
Lab Zero have somebody in place for toning down the sexualization of the characters? Where did you hear this?
Sorry, I disagree. It's not the sexualization per se it's how the outfit doesn't make any sense, like showing skin was the #1 priority in thinking it up. The breastplate, I don't know how it'd even stay on. She covers her legs and arms and hands but not her belly (a common stereotype). She wears armour directly on the skin too (a pet peeve of mine). What she's wearing doesn't even look comfortable.
It's not the worst I've ever seen, and at least she's not striking a dumb pose so points for that, but I still don't like it. You want to make a half-naked barbarian warrior, fine, how about this? Or this (example on the right)? There's more skin exposed but guess why I think they are better designs, because they make sense.
It's basically how they keep Zone in check.
It's pretty obvious her hands are protected because she's an archer. It makes sense that the coverage would extend to her arms when she's using huge lances as projectiles. The uncovered skin suggests to me primarily a confidence in her own abilities (an impression first given to me by the sort of cocky smirk on her face and then her outrageous weapon). I guess you could also argue a mobility aspect, but I think it's more about the asthetics. From the artist's perspective I mean, not the characters's. Uncovered belly prob just because they thought she looked cool that way. It's not really emphasized much tbh. It doesn't seem like she has a right breast, at least the piece of art we have gives the impression there isn't one, which makes me think Alex Ahad was inspired from the myths that Amazonian warriors cauterized their right breasts as young girls so as to better use a bow and arrow (assuming they're right handed I guess). So the breastplate seemingly has no breast to hinder it and appears to be connected to the iron shoulder pad which is anchoring it and has a pieace of cloth tied to its left looping behind her back, to prevent it from moving around much I'm guessing.Sorry, I disagree. It's not the sexualization per se it's how the outfit doesn't make any sense, like showing skin was the #1 priority in thinking it up. The breastplate, I don't know how it'd even stay on. She covers her legs and arms and hands but not her belly (a common stereotype). She wears armour directly on the skin too (a pet peeve of mine). What she's wearing doesn't even look comfortable.
It's not the worst I've ever seen, and at least she's not striking a dumb pose so points for that, but I still don't like it. You want to supposedly make a half-naked barbarian warrior, fine, how about this? Or this (example on the right)? There's more skin exposed but guess why I think they are better designs, because they make sense.
I'm always so confused when practicality is discussed.
Becuase it's fun to discuss character designs and why, in the context of their fictional world, they look the way they do.I'm always so confused when practicality is discussed.
it was kagari in the last FF15 thread that said something about practicality in a fantasy setting isn't worth weighing. I'm misquoting some so I should probably find the post, but thats how I've always felt.Always better to leave the discussion alone and hope it dies imo, FF 15 threads were killed/drowned in stupid design discussions that you couldnt actually talk about the game.(well you could try though lol)