n0razi
Member
I'm expecting them to still be over the 250 range by that time if not still at 300.
There was a couple of bundles for $275 ish this BF
I'm expecting them to still be over the 250 range by that time if not still at 300.
My rule with Nintendo: take what would be best for them or what would make most sense, then add $50. So for the handheld I'm expecting $250, for the console $350. Goes without saying that I think $200 and $300 are far better price points and what I'm hoping for. Either that or multiple SKUs.
Number one factor is that the thing needs to be desirable, though. If you get that right price doesn't matter half as much.
Really? It already hit that low? I only ever saw 300 bundles. I guess I didn't look hard enough.There was a couple of bundles for $275 ish this BF
Really? It already hit that low? I only ever saw 300 bundles. I guess I didn't look hard enough.
Sucks for everyone that just bought a Wii U this weekend.
I was thinking about pricing and was wondering how plausible is it that Nintendo actually launches at three price points? $150, $250, and $350? Would it be too confusing brand wise?
Yup. Now that I think about it. It doesn't make much sense. What would a $250 machine offer over the other two? The only way it would make sense is if $150 was handheld, $250 was console, and $350 was both.... But that will never happen.That's what marketing and branding are for. I don't see them launching with 3 different models though.
Why? Does the Wii U have a kill switch that activates when the NX releases that I didn't know about?
Why y'all do this? Every generation and what do we get? Ports and nintendoland.No way Nintendo has gone this incredibly quiet about WiiU and future titles if they're not working on and planning on release its successor very, very soon. As in, next year.
Sucks for everyone that just bought a Wii U this weekend.
Makes me wonder if people will combine the sales figures of the console and hendheld since they're supposed to have a shared OS.
If Nintendo mess the NX up. What do you think will happen to Nintendo?
Death. This is their final time and it better be a good one.If Nintendo mess the NX up. What do you think will happen to Nintendo?
Why y'all do this? Every generation and what do we get? Ports and nintendoland.
difference there being that certain teams are going to have to have things ready by next year. ead tokyo is due, retro studios is due. it's zelda's 30th anniversary and pokemon's 20th anniversary. these are games that would have sway at launch big time.
i don't think they're hitting all at once though. pokemon might be a 3ds game based on the precedent of black/white and black/white 2 happening before x/y, but zelda's definitely a launch title and i think we'll have a 3d mario at launch too, with retro's game saved for february or march.
Pokemon will be 3DS. Switching hardware mid-gen is just asking for trouble.
No way Nintendo has gone this incredibly quiet about WiiU and future titles if they're not working on and planning on release its successor very, very soon. As in, next year.
Death. This is their final time and it better be a good one.
Let's be real, Nintendo could come up with 5 different versions of their home console to please everyone and people (dedicated gamers) would still only care about the higher specs one and how it compares to the PS4/Xbone so I don't really see your point.
mid-gen? didn't they have their chance for a gen vi part two and waste it this year?
pokemon gen i-2 next year for the 20th anniversary as an nx launch game let's do this.
People seem set on thinking we're getting a XYZ game or something soon no matter what.
IMO Nintendo may have wised up and told GF to get to stepping on a NX launch mainline title. I mean, I just can't help but think that Nintendo was riding high on the success of the DS and thought that would carry over to the 3DS so they didn't worry and let GF drag their feet on making the change.
A mainline Pokemon game is a guaranteed massive boon for release.
People seem set on thinking we're getting a XYZ game or something soon no matter what.
IMO Nintendo may have wised up and told GF to get to stepping on a NX launch mainline title. I mean, I just can't help but think that Nintendo was riding high on the success of the DS and thought that would carry over to the 3DS so they didn't worry and let GF drag their feet on making the change.
A mainline Pokemon game is a guaranteed massive boon for release.
mid-gen? didn't they have their chance for a gen vi part two and waste it this year?
pokemon gen i-2 next year for the 20th anniversary as an nx launch game let's do this.
People seem set on thinking we're getting a XYZ game or something soon no matter what.
IMO Nintendo may have wised up and told GF to get to stepping on a NX launch mainline title. I mean, I just can't help but think that Nintendo was riding high on the success of the DS and thought that would carry over to the 3DS so they didn't worry and let GF drag their feet on making the change.
A mainline Pokemon game is a guaranteed massive boon for release.
I think the game's just late. Pokemon's generally a well-oiled machine with branding, they wouldn't have established "XYZ" stuff in all other facets of the series and then just forgot with the game.
I think it'll be fine. Oh, and Xbox 360 came 4 years after original Xbox, fwiw.I think it's too soon for Nintendo to ask fans to purchase a new console if NX comes out in 2016. 4 years is an extremely shorts generation and I just don't see this console being successful.
I think it'll be fine. Oh, and Xbox 360 came 4 years after original Xbox, fwiw.
I think it's too soon for Nintendo to ask fans to purchase a new console if NX comes out in 2016. 4 years is an extremely shorts generation and I just don't see this console being successful.
Foxconn are not the best regarding hardware quality.
Nintendo are desperate....
There was a couple of bundles for $275 ish this BF
Foxconn are not the best regarding hardware quality.
Nintendo are desperate....
Wasnt foxconn in trouble for mis managing their employees or something? Like unsafe working conditions? Or am I thinking of something else or did everyone throw a fit over it but forgot it like everything else? lol
Foxconn are not the best regarding hardware quality.
Nintendo are desperate....
And here's the original GAF thread from July 02, based on the same rumor:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1073971
I think it's too soon for Nintendo to ask fans to purchase a new console if NX comes out in 2016. 4 years is an extremely shorts generation and I just don't see this console being successful.
Yes, they should keep on beating this dead horse instead. Maybe it will surprisingly rise up and take them galloping across the vastfields of Hyrule.empty
Yep. NX news on 1st of January or bust.Only 1 month until 2016 :O
Zelda is still for Wii U.
I always get lost with Nintendo NX threads go into speculating that NX will be "underpowered". I don't expect Nintendo to release a home console that is not at least on par technologically with what's already on the market. They have never done that as far as I can remember. They already have the weakest console (which that they should be able to manufacture more cheaply in the coming years) and they're going to drop it to release another machine that'll struggle to get ports from their competitors' consoles? It would be a completely inexplicable move.
Nintendo must know definitively that they cannot support their consoles singe-handedly especially in an era where "AAA" games require so many resources to make. For that same reason, third party developers want to be able to easily port their titles to different platforms which means that a console that doesn't share baseline functionality with the others (and also has the lowest userbase) will get left out. The Wii suffered in that way but the effects were offset by its massive independent success.
When the NX launches PS4 would have been out for about three years. I cannot imagine a universe where Nintendo releases a new console that doesn't match a machine that came out three years before it. So I find speculcation that NX won't match the PS4 to be largely pointless. IMO, nobody should expect that as it would be extremely bizarre. If they turn out to be right, "Scotty, beam me up".
I can understand speculation that there probably won't be a "generational gap" even though NX will technically be the successor to Wii U and therefore the next generation after XBS4. But obviously weaker? No way! Nintendo wants NX out quickly to narrow the technological gap and generate renewed interest to revitalize its home console business.
We will see if they start a new generation and thus developers put it in the Xbox Two / PS 5 performance bracket or if they target it in the same performance bracket as Xbox One and PS4 like they targeted Wii U as being in PS360's performance one, but last time they launched 8 years after their competition and released something that was somewhat faster and somewhat slower than the PS360 generation and nowhere near Xbox One and PS4.
I find some of the price predictions / expectations for anything on this website hilarious.
Yes, Nintendo's new console will launch between $100-150, and the PSVR will be $150-200, and the HTC Vive will be $200-250, and you can put together a PC to drive it for years for just $300-350.
Anything more than any of those prices and these nasty companies are just gouging you!
I mean, a dinner out with a friend comes to about $100 after wine where I'm at. That's some fucking chicken, potatoes and fermented grapes cooked by people who don't exactly need doctorates to do their jobs. But the technological product of accumulated genius upon genius in chip development over the years to create the APU, the massive undertaking of software engineers in OS design and programming, all that additional hardware (controller etc), all the production costs to put it together, all the R&D, all the minerals it takes to make everything, marketing expenses, the shipping costs, the retailer's cut...
Somehow all of that should add up to about $150 for this thing. Man, I don't understand it. I really don't.
My rule with Nintendo: take what would be best for them or what would make most sense, then add $50. So for the handheld I'm expecting $250, for the console $350. Goes without saying that I think $200 and $300 are far better price points and what I'm hoping for. Either that or multiple SKUs.
Number one factor is that the thing needs to be desirable, though. If you get that right price doesn't matter half as much.