• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digitimes Rumor: Nintendo to ship 10-12m NX units in 2016, mass production in Q2

D

Deleted member 465307

Unconfirmed Member
My rule with Nintendo: take what would be best for them or what would make most sense, then add $50. So for the handheld I'm expecting $250, for the console $350. Goes without saying that I think $200 and $300 are far better price points and what I'm hoping for. Either that or multiple SKUs.

Number one factor is that the thing needs to be desirable, though. If you get that right price doesn't matter half as much.

I agree about the desirability, but I disagree about the price of a handheld. The 3DS launched at $250 and quickly afterwards was followed by an $80 price cut. That to me says that Nintendo won't launch another handheld at that price again without having something cheaper on the market. I'd expect the price of a new Nintendo handheld to arrive at $170-$220. If there is a second model, like the XL or similar to the iPhone 6 Plus compared against the 6, then I'd say it might arrive at $250. But I can't see the cheapest option being available at what was 3DS's downfall 5 years ago.

I agree with your logic about the home console. I think Nintendo needs to launch at $250-$300, but I'm guessing it'll be $350.
 
I was thinking about pricing and was wondering how plausible is it that Nintendo actually launches at three price points? $150, $250, and $350? Would it be too confusing brand wise?

Edit: Now that I think about it... It doesn't make much sense unless they have specific markets in mind. Or they bundle the console and handheld together. The middle price would end up feeling liking something compromised if it was a third form factor.
 

Sandfox

Member
I was thinking about pricing and was wondering how plausible is it that Nintendo actually launches at three price points? $150, $250, and $350? Would it be too confusing brand wise?

That's what marketing and branding are for. I don't see them launching with 3 different models though.
 
That's what marketing and branding are for. I don't see them launching with 3 different models though.
Yup. Now that I think about it. It doesn't make much sense. What would a $250 machine offer over the other two? The only way it would make sense is if $150 was handheld, $250 was console, and $350 was both.... But that will never happen.
 

EloquentM

aka Mannny
No way Nintendo has gone this incredibly quiet about WiiU and future titles if they're not working on and planning on release its successor very, very soon. As in, next year.
Why y'all do this? Every generation and what do we get? Ports and nintendoland.
 

Elios83

Member
Even if the forecast is true (which I doubt) it's pointless until the product is announced and they get a real market feedback with preorders.
Btw I'm really looking forward to see what Nintendo is cooking. If they are making a unified platform with different SKUs (home, handheld) but same games (with graphical differences) I think it will be an interesting product, at least for the potential of playing all Nintendo games on a single platform.
 

jroc74

Phone reception is more important to me than human rights
Sucks for everyone that just bought a Wii U this weekend.

Yea....and those same folks probably wont be getting an NX when it launches. Probably wont until a few years after it launches.

Its a Catch 22, rock and a hard place Nintendo have themselves in.

Makes me wonder if people will combine the sales figures of the console and hendheld since they're supposed to have a shared OS.

Not only ppl but Nintendo will as well. MS is already straying away from XBO console sales. I can see Nintendo combining sales of both.

Look at someone already mentioning in this thread historical Nintendo hardware sales and combining home and handheld sales as reference. They basically have been the only successful handheld maker for many years. Someone questioning the numbers is obviously talking about the home console.

If Nintendo mess the NX up. What do you think will happen to Nintendo?

They will try handhelds only before going 3rd party, mobile. They basically are the handheld market by themselves.

As for the NX...I will be optimistic like I was for the Wii U. But I dont think it will sell well. Someone mentioned an Ouya, Shield type of device. I can see that happening. I havent even ruled out a mobile phone or a tablet.
 

AniHawk

Member
Why y'all do this? Every generation and what do we get? Ports and nintendoland.

difference there being that certain teams are going to have to have things ready by next year. ead tokyo is due, retro studios is due. it's zelda's 30th anniversary and pokemon's 20th anniversary. these are games that would have sway at launch big time.

i don't think they're hitting all at once though. pokemon might be a 3ds game based on the precedent of black/white and black/white 2 happening before x/y, but zelda's definitely a launch title and i think we'll have a 3d mario at launch too, with retro's game saved for february or march.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
difference there being that certain teams are going to have to have things ready by next year. ead tokyo is due, retro studios is due. it's zelda's 30th anniversary and pokemon's 20th anniversary. these are games that would have sway at launch big time.

i don't think they're hitting all at once though. pokemon might be a 3ds game based on the precedent of black/white and black/white 2 happening before x/y, but zelda's definitely a launch title and i think we'll have a 3d mario at launch too, with retro's game saved for february or march.

Pokemon will be 3DS. Switching hardware mid-gen is just asking for trouble.
 

Not

Banned
Only if people care. Don't screw this up Nintendo. None of us know if you know what you're doing at this point.
 

AniHawk

Member
Pokemon will be 3DS. Switching hardware mid-gen is just asking for trouble.

mid-gen? didn't they have their chance for a gen vi part two and waste it this year?

pokemon gen i-2 next year for the 20th anniversary as an nx launch game let's do this.
 

Not

Banned
No way Nintendo has gone this incredibly quiet about WiiU and future titles if they're not working on and planning on release its successor very, very soon. As in, next year.

Dude. They got nothing. They always have nothing.

Well, Zelda. And they're going to treat it like a whole launch lineup in itself.
 

Kataploom

Gold Member
Let's be real, Nintendo could come up with 5 different versions of their home console to please everyone and people (dedicated gamers) would still only care about the higher specs one and how it compares to the PS4/Xbone so I don't really see your point.

Core players as you and me? Right. A grandfather or a parent looking for something cool to give their children on holidays? I don't think they think to much about specs to really care if the price gap if fairly big (like $100 between the lower and higher tier)
 
mid-gen? didn't they have their chance for a gen vi part two and waste it this year?

pokemon gen i-2 next year for the 20th anniversary as an nx launch game let's do this.

People seem set on thinking we're getting a XYZ game or something soon no matter what.

IMO Nintendo may have wised up and told GF to get to stepping on a NX launch mainline title. I mean, I just can't help but think that Nintendo was riding high on the success of the DS and thought that would carry over to the 3DS so they didn't worry and let GF drag their feet on making the change.

A mainline Pokemon game is a guaranteed massive boon for release.
 
I would actually like to see gamefreak make a internal pokemon spinoff for the 20th, Tembo team most likely could do it.
Plus I have a feeling gen1 will come to mobile, 6 odd months after its 3DS release.
 

AniHawk

Member
People seem set on thinking we're getting a XYZ game or something soon no matter what.

IMO Nintendo may have wised up and told GF to get to stepping on a NX launch mainline title. I mean, I just can't help but think that Nintendo was riding high on the success of the DS and thought that would carry over to the 3DS so they didn't worry and let GF drag their feet on making the change.

A mainline Pokemon game is a guaranteed massive boon for release.

if there was a possibility of having a pokemon, zelda, and mario at launch, i'd fucking take it. i could definitely see iwata gently pushing gf in that direction. the 9th gen should be them taking no chances with scheduling.
 

iBlue

Member
I don't think I will get an NX at launch. First buyers are always like beta testers and I don't want any issues with my console lol
 
People seem set on thinking we're getting a XYZ game or something soon no matter what.

IMO Nintendo may have wised up and told GF to get to stepping on a NX launch mainline title. I mean, I just can't help but think that Nintendo was riding high on the success of the DS and thought that would carry over to the 3DS so they didn't worry and let GF drag their feet on making the change.

A mainline Pokemon game is a guaranteed massive boon for release.

I think the game's just late. Pokemon's generally a well-oiled machine with branding, they wouldn't have established "XYZ" stuff in all other facets of the series and then just forgot with the game.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
mid-gen? didn't they have their chance for a gen vi part two and waste it this year?

pokemon gen i-2 next year for the 20th anniversary as an nx launch game let's do this.

It's pretty common for Game Freak to take a year or two off during a generation. Besides, stuff like the anime transitioning to XY & Z basically confirms that Z version is a thing.

People seem set on thinking we're getting a XYZ game or something soon no matter what.

IMO Nintendo may have wised up and told GF to get to stepping on a NX launch mainline title. I mean, I just can't help but think that Nintendo was riding high on the success of the DS and thought that would carry over to the 3DS so they didn't worry and let GF drag their feet on making the change.

A mainline Pokemon game is a guaranteed massive boon for release.

See above.

I think the game's just late. Pokemon's generally a well-oiled machine with branding, they wouldn't have established "XYZ" stuff in all other facets of the series and then just forgot with the game.

Basically, this.
 

ryan299

Member
I think it's too soon for Nintendo to ask fans to purchase a new console if NX comes out in 2016. 4 years is an extremely shorts generation and I just don't see this console being successful.
 
I think it's too soon for Nintendo to ask fans to purchase a new console if NX comes out in 2016. 4 years is an extremely shorts generation and I just don't see this console being successful.
I think it'll be fine. Oh, and Xbox 360 came 4 years after original Xbox, fwiw.
 

AniHawk

Member
I think it'll be fine. Oh, and Xbox 360 came 4 years after original Xbox, fwiw.

you can also point to sega doing kind of the same thing with the master system (although that was already a weird journey in and of itself) and the mega drive, and sega again with the saturn and the dreamcast.

the wii u is the best option for an 8th gen family console, but mostly a luxury item for nintendo fans. mainstream nintendo fans will have a 3ds, which is pretty much maxed out in all honestly.
 

Pokemaniac

Member
I think it's too soon for Nintendo to ask fans to purchase a new console if NX comes out in 2016. 4 years is an extremely shorts generation and I just don't see this console being successful.

It's not really that short when you consider the context of how it performed on the market. It's only really one year short of a standard lifetime. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
There was a couple of bundles for $275 ish this BF

You could effectively pay $240 for an Xbone game bundle last week at Target.
 
Wasnt foxconn in trouble for mis managing their employees or something? Like unsafe working conditions? Or am I thinking of something else or did everyone throw a fit over it but forgot it like everything else? lol
 
Wasnt foxconn in trouble for mis managing their employees or something? Like unsafe working conditions? Or am I thinking of something else or did everyone throw a fit over it but forgot it like everything else? lol

Yes using unpaid college interns for menial labor or something.

All the major consoles are manufactured by them so this wouldn't be anything new.
 
I think it's too soon for Nintendo to ask fans to purchase a new console if NX comes out in 2016. 4 years is an extremely shorts generation and I just don't see this console being successful.

Yes, they should keep on beating this dead horse instead. Maybe it will surprisingly rise up and take them galloping across the vast
empty
fields of Hyrule.
 

Diffense

Member
I always get lost with Nintendo NX threads go into speculating that NX will be "underpowered". I don't expect Nintendo to release a home console that is not at least on par technologically with what's already on the market. They have never done that as far as I can remember. They already have the weakest console (which that they should be able to manufacture more cheaply in the coming years) and they're going to drop it to release another machine that'll struggle to get ports from their competitors' consoles? It would be a completely inexplicable move.

Nintendo must know definitively that they cannot support their consoles singe-handedly especially in an era where "AAA" games require so many resources to make. For that same reason, third party developers want to be able to easily port their titles to different platforms which means that a console that doesn't share baseline functionality with the others (and also has the lowest userbase) will get left out. The Wii suffered in that way but the effects were offset by its massive independent success.

When the NX launches PS4 would have been out for about three years. I cannot imagine a universe where Nintendo releases a new console that doesn't match a machine that came out three years before it. So I find speculcation that NX won't match the PS4 to be largely pointless. IMO, nobody should expect that as it would be extremely bizarre. If they turn out to be right, "Scotty, beam me up".

I can understand speculation that there probably won't be a "generational gap" even though NX will technically be the successor to Wii U and therefore the next generation after XBS4. But obviously weaker? No way! Nintendo wants NX out quickly to narrow the technological gap and generate renewed interest to revitalize its home console business.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
I always get lost with Nintendo NX threads go into speculating that NX will be "underpowered". I don't expect Nintendo to release a home console that is not at least on par technologically with what's already on the market. They have never done that as far as I can remember. They already have the weakest console (which that they should be able to manufacture more cheaply in the coming years) and they're going to drop it to release another machine that'll struggle to get ports from their competitors' consoles? It would be a completely inexplicable move.

Nintendo must know definitively that they cannot support their consoles singe-handedly especially in an era where "AAA" games require so many resources to make. For that same reason, third party developers want to be able to easily port their titles to different platforms which means that a console that doesn't share baseline functionality with the others (and also has the lowest userbase) will get left out. The Wii suffered in that way but the effects were offset by its massive independent success.

When the NX launches PS4 would have been out for about three years. I cannot imagine a universe where Nintendo releases a new console that doesn't match a machine that came out three years before it. So I find speculcation that NX won't match the PS4 to be largely pointless. IMO, nobody should expect that as it would be extremely bizarre. If they turn out to be right, "Scotty, beam me up".

I can understand speculation that there probably won't be a "generational gap" even though NX will technically be the successor to Wii U and therefore the next generation after XBS4. But obviously weaker? No way! Nintendo wants NX out quickly to narrow the technological gap and generate renewed interest to revitalize its home console business.

We will see if they start a new generation and thus developers put it in the Xbox Two / PS 5 performance bracket or if they target it in the same performance bracket as Xbox One and PS4 like they targeted Wii U as being in PS360's performance one, but last time they launched 8 years after their competition and released something that was somewhat faster and somewhat slower than the PS360 generation and nowhere near Xbox One and PS4.
 

AniHawk

Member
We will see if they start a new generation and thus developers put it in the Xbox Two / PS 5 performance bracket or if they target it in the same performance bracket as Xbox One and PS4 like they targeted Wii U as being in PS360's performance one, but last time they launched 8 years after their competition and released something that was somewhat faster and somewhat slower than the PS360 generation and nowhere near Xbox One and PS4.

i think if they proceed with nx as i think they will, generations as we've come to know them will effectively become meaningless.
 
I find some of the price predictions / expectations for anything on this website hilarious.

Yes, Nintendo's new console will launch between $100-150, and the PSVR will be $150-200, and the HTC Vive will be $200-250, and you can put together a PC to drive it for years for just $300-350.

Anything more than any of those prices and these nasty companies are just gouging you!

I mean, a dinner out with a friend comes to about $100 after wine where I'm at. That's some fucking chicken, potatoes and fermented grapes cooked by people who don't exactly need doctorates to do their jobs. But the technological product of accumulated genius upon genius in chip development over the years to create the APU, the massive undertaking of software engineers in OS design and programming, all that additional hardware (controller etc), all the production costs to put it together, all the R&D, all the minerals it takes to make everything, marketing expenses, the shipping costs, the retailer's cut...

Somehow all of that should add up to about $150 for this thing. Man, I don't understand it. I really don't.

My rule with Nintendo: take what would be best for them or what would make most sense, then add $50. So for the handheld I'm expecting $250, for the console $350. Goes without saying that I think $200 and $300 are far better price points and what I'm hoping for. Either that or multiple SKUs.

Number one factor is that the thing needs to be desirable, though. If you get that right price doesn't matter half as much.

If Nintendo really do launch a home console at $350 next year they might as well start digging a grave for it right next to the Wii U.
 
Top Bottom