• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tracer's butt victory pose will be removed from Overwatch

Status
Not open for further replies.
The way GGers have tried to twist "ethical" into a negative term just drives me fucking crazy.

Anyway. It didn't personally offend me but I'm okay with the change, it makes sense for them to want to be as inclusive as possible. The female characters in Overwatch (both the designs and the way they're treated by the camera) have definitely been far more sexualized than the male characters.
 
Don't believe those are Blizz's words: "We'll replace the pose. We want *everyone* to feel strong and heroic in our community. The last thing we want to do is make someone feel uncomfortable, under-appreciated or misrepresented.

Apologies and we'll continue to try to do better."

I'm probably dumb but how can that pose make you feel under-appreciated or misrepresented?
 

GavinUK86

Member
Py9Yym5.jpg


Male equivalent of the pose

I don't appreciate Hanzo being sexualized like this. He's not a sex object people.
 
Nothing about that pose is particularly sexual to me. Maybe the outfit, but that's true regardless of her pose. She's just standing backwards. That said, it also doesn't seem to be sparking much about her character especially given her outfit (haven't looked too much into the game yet)
 

antonz

Member
Poses outside of the default are unlocked from chests. Players have to willingly select other poses etc. from the default. If you personally feel a pose does not fit your viewpoint of a characters persona then do not select that pose use one of the dozens of others.

No one is forced to pick any particular pose besides the default. Really seems to be a case of making a big deal out of nothing and Blizzard now gets a PR win.
 

Russ T

Banned
Oh, cool, it's great to see Blizzard listening to logical argu---

*sees people whining because they like butts*

...Awkward.
 

ghostjoke

Banned
Why is this a story? From either side, this seems like a nothing thing that should have just been patched without anyone batting an eye. Advertising and promotion are getting weirder by the day.

Also, Solid Snake's ass for life.
 
I'm just trying to figure out what butt? I mean if it was r.mika or cammy type character sure, but if all the characters have that pose in the game what's the problem. Stop staring it I guess? Lol I know just weird who cares either way
 

ponpo

( ≖‿≖)
Poses outside of the default are unlocked from chests. Players have to willingly select other poses etc. from the default. If you personally feel a pose does not fit your viewpoint of a characters persona then do not select that pose use one of the dozens of others.

No one is forced to pick any particular pose besides the default

Really seems to be a case of making a big deal out of nothing and Blizzard now gets a PR win.

Blizzard gets the PR, buttlords get their SFM porn videos still. Everyone wins.
 

AtticuSMT

Banned
If you ever wonder if your opinion changes anything, just remember that one person complaining took a pose out of a video game.



Seriously... This is beyond ridiculous. Leave in the pose and if you don't like it don't select it? Is it too hard to not select it if you don't like, much less take it away from everyone.
 
So to clarify, another character has this same sexy pose, but that's part of her character so it's okay. But this was uncharacteristic of Tracer, so they removed it

Right?
 

Zolo

Member
This is still in tho.

windowmaker-victory-pose-4-over-the-shoulder.png


Not worth the outrage. If it doesn't fit the character then the pose just seems corny. You can see her bum all the time anyway and others still have "sexy" poses so whatever.

Still, D.VA bum pose when.

I'm fine with the removal, but they kinda lose the ethics argument if this is still in anyway.

Nothing about that pose is particularly sexual to me. Maybe the outfit, but that's true regardless of her pose. She's just standing backwards. That said, it also doesn't seem to be sparking much about her character especially given her outfit (haven't looked too much into the game yet)

And then this is the weird case where 'ethical' reasons are cited, yet the big reason why this shows up is due to sexualizing so many of the female characters in the first place.

So to clarify, another character has this same sexy pose, but that's part of her character so it's okay. But this was uncharacteristic of Tracer, so they removed it

Right?
They cited ethical reasons......but apparently, another character still has the pose? Plus, it doesn't change the sexualized designs in the first place.
 

DocSeuss

Member
It bugs me that someone can post "this doesn't fit with my interpretation of the character so it shouldn't exist in a game," and despite a clear majority of the comments disagreeing with that person, the dev removes the option from the game. If it's a selectable option, the more sensible response is "cool, it's not required, so don't use it if you don't want."

I mean... Tracer wanting to look cute and striking a pose like that seems EXACTLY like Tracer to me, based on everything I've seen of Tracer. The "hey, she's spunky and wholesome" thing just seems like really fucking weird projection.

ffs, Salute actually accentuates the butt. If anything's more 'offensive,' it's that. I don't get what's wrong with a cutesy character in cutesy poses tho. Every character should have poses like this. I'll take a sexy Winston pose, please.
 
They can do what they want but making changes for the sake of "not offending anyone" is an impossible feat in this day in age. Remove it to be more in line with the Tracer's personality? K. The offended people will just move on to bitching about Widow then. Then move on to something else.
 

blamite

Member
Not allowed to take advice or criticism when it comes to boobs and butts, it's in the game design bylaws.

"You'll stick with your initial decisions forever regardless of whether or not you eventually think better of them, and you'll like it, damn it."
 

notworksafe

Member
Unacceptable! I demand a butt pose of Roadhog to compensate for this loss.

Me playing mostly Roadhog has nothing to do with this in the slightest.

Seriously though you see the pose for like 5 seconds at the end of a match. This being removed is really not any big loss.
 

XenoRaven

Member
Poses outside of the default are unlocked from chests. Players have to willingly select other poses etc. from the default. If you personally feel a pose does not fit your viewpoint of a characters persona then do not select that pose use one of the dozens of others.

No one is forced to pick any particular pose besides the default. Really seems to be a case of making a big deal out of nothing and Blizzard now gets a PR win.
People who are in the match with you still have to see it if you selected it. It's still not a big deal though. It annoys me that they're removing it, but it's not going to prevent me from getting the game.
 

Eusis

Member
A little weird, but not as bad as I feared.

While she's sexualized I do feel it'd be weird for the kind of character she seems to be to go heavy with it.
 
I'm fine with the removal, but they kinda lose the ethics argument if this is still in anyway.

Read the complaint that the change seems to be based on. The poster notes that there's nothing wrong with Widowmaker's poses because she's defined by her sexuality. Tracer isn't supposed to be sexualized. She's a spunky character, and that's what the poster took issue with.
 

Sabas

Banned
Pose didn't fit with that particular character, devs are changing it, win-win? I'm not sure what the big deal is.
 
It bugs me that someone can post "this doesn't fit with my interpretation of the character so it shouldn't exist in a game," and despite a clear majority of the comments disagreeing with that person, the dev removes the option from the game. If it's a selectable option, the more sensible response is "cool, it's not required, so don't use it if you don't want."

I mean... Tracer wanting to look cute and striking a pose like that seems EXACTLY like Tracer to me, based on everything I've seen of Tracer. The "hey, she's spunky and wholesome" thing just seems like really fucking weird projection.

The developers put something in the game. They received feedback which gave them second thoughts. After this re-evaluation they decided, yes, we as the creators of the character agree that maybe this isn't the most appropriate direction to take them.

This is standard part of the creative process.

I'm fine with the removal, but they kinda lose the ethics argument if this is still in anyway.



And then this is the weird case where 'ethical' reasons are cited, yet the big reason why this shows up is due to sexualizing so many of the female characters in the first place.


They cited ethical reasons......but apparently, another character still has the pose? Plus, it doesn't change the sexualized designs in the first place.

No, ethics was not the reason. The OverwatchGG twitter which cited "ethics" is fan-run. The actual forum post by the game director says nothing about ethics.

I know nothing about the twitter in question but I wonder what the "GG" stands for..
 
It reminds me of the R Mika butt slap removal: a very small change that is very, very silly in context with the rest of the character. It's nowhere nearly as silly as the Mika changes, but most of the official Tracer art I've seen (including the Origins Edition cover) is very much butt focused.
 

sqwarlock

Member
If you ever wonder if your opinion changes anything, just remember that one person complaining took a pose out of a video game.



Seriously... This is beyond ridiculous. Leave in the pose and if you don't like it don't select it? Is it too hard to not select it if you don't like, much less take it away from everyone.

The victory pose is shown to everyone in the match when it ends. So maybe you can't select it, but another player could.
 

DocSeuss

Member
Not if you take the original forum post and Kapplan's response at face value, no.

Taking them at face value, that's EXACTLY the impression I had, which is so weird, because that person's idea of what's characteristic/uncharacteristic of Tracer is so different than what I think is characteristic/uncharacteristic of her.
 
I guess they can do what they want but it's not necessarily offensive either. Take it or leave it for me. I thought that Mika's DE emphasized butt slap was a worse change because it fit her character and was kind of funny. Also weird because you see her butt all the time anyway. Not sure why that moment was too far.
 
It reminds me of the R Mika butt slap removal: a very small change that is very, very silly in context with the rest of the character. It's nowhere nearly as silly as the Mika changes, but most of the official Tracer art I've seen (including the Origins Edition cover) is very much butt focused.

Mika still slaps tho
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom