I don't think that's very likely at all.The chip is less complex than you could think from the die size. 2560 SPs is a really low number for a chip of 7.2B of transistors though - I wonder if the FP64 performance is kept at 1/2 FP32 like in GP100?
There are a lot of questions like this one popping up and the answer will always depend on the game, and the target graphics options and framerate.I have I5-4670 CPU, is the 1070 overkill for my slightly older CPU?
How long would you say is estimated until a GTX 1080 Ti is released?
Chances are only the founder's edition have cooling for the 2.1ghz they showed
depends if you like open-world gamesI have I5-4670 CPU, is the 1070 overkill for my slightly older CPU?
Less than I hoped performance wise but less than I thought price wise. I'll have to see how the OC editions will perform compared to 980TiOC to decide if I want to upgrade.
The chip is less complex than you could think from the die size. 2560 SPs is a really low number for a chip of 7.2B of transistors though - I wonder if the FP64 performance is kept at 1/2 FP32 like in GP100?
9TFlops is a nice figure for a stock clocks though - +50% to TitanX. If the card will be able to OC to 2100MHz on factory OC models that'd bump the pure math power to 10.75 TFlops. Not bad for what is a lower high end card.
1070 on the other hand gets quite a decimation with 6.5 TFlops. If the clocks will be roughly the same (which they're likely to be judging from 970 vs 980) they'll have to chop nearly 1/3 of the chip off to get there. So I'm thinking - 1920 SPs on ~1.7GHz? Seems like quite a salvage there but for $379 I don't think that anyone would mind.
As for the proper benchmarks - I'm guessing on May 27th? Still don't see why they even announced the cards today tbh.
Have SLI 980, is it worth upgrading to a 1080? hm
No unless you get high refresh rate monitors.
My 980ti hp doesn't seem like a good deal anymore
depends if you like open-world games
My 680 is starting to show its age. That 1070 is looking super appealing...
Do we have a rough timeline when these will be implemented on laptop hardware?
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-gpu-gtc-2016/#ixzz47vzgolULThe Tesla P100 features a slightly cut back GP100 GPU and delivers 5.3 teraflops of double precision compute, 10.6 TFLOPS of single precision compute and 21.2 TFLOPS of half precision FP16 compute.
Can someone explain this in DBZ power levels
Nope. A television in fact.
If 1080ti comes within 80% of 980ti SLI, I will sell my cards and grab the 1080ti and return to the single GPU world.
Great just thinking these will make for highly appealing VR laptops... Can't wait980M dropped a month after 980 desktop - so that could be a good indicator.
Oh 1440p changes things, I think in many cases your CPU won't bottleneck before your GPU does.I mostly play rpg's like Skyrim, Dragon Age and Witcher. I would like to run games at 1440p.
AMD will very likely go for lower affordable segments.My 780's fate is sealed. Question is do I go for a 1080 (VR/144hz gaming), or go 1070 for now and go Ti (HBM2) when released?
Also, when is AMD's show? I need to know ASAP what they're doing. I'm guessing they need to show off something and fast. They can't afford to tell people to wait and see because people are going to run out for especially that 1070...
But they would have to use controversial benchmarks like Ashes and Quantum Break.I'll happily sell my 970 for a 1070 if DX12 performance will be much better. Digital Foundry to the rescue!
Great just thinking these will make for highly appealing VR laptops... Can't wait
Wow that is great news but now i'm in a tight spot. I ordered an HP pc with a 980ti for $1200 but it doesn't ship till Tuesday. Should I just cancel that and order a 1080 or will it most likely be sold out at launch?
With the 1070, i would be able to run a 1440p 144hz gsync monitor? worth it?
My 780's fate is sealed. Question is do I go for a 1080 (VR/144hz gaming), or go 1070 for now and go Ti (HBM2) when released?
Also, when is AMD's show? I need to know ASAP what they're doing. I'm guessing they need to show off something and fast. They can't afford to tell people to wait and see because people are going to run out for especially that 1070...
Its not when you consider that a $380 card in a month is better than the 980ti.
It seems well suited for that.With the 1070, i would be able to run a 1440p 144hz gsync monitor? worth it?
Less than I hoped performance wise but less than I thought price wise. I'll have to see how the OC editions will perform compared to 980TiOC to decide if I want to upgrade.
The chip is less complex than you could think from the die size. 2560 SPs is a really low number for a chip of 7.2B of transistors though - I wonder if the FP64 performance is kept at 1/2 FP32 like in GP100?
9TFlops is a nice figure for a stock clocks though - +50% to TitanX. If the card will be able to OC to 2100MHz on factory OC models that'd bump the pure math power to 10.75 TFlops. Not bad for what is a lower high end card.
1070 on the other hand gets quite a decimation with 6.5 TFlops. If the clocks will be roughly the same (which they're likely to be judging from 970 vs 980) they'll have to chop nearly 1/3 of the chip off to get there. So I'm thinking - 1920 SPs on ~1.7GHz? Seems like quite a salvage there but for $379 I don't think that anyone would mind.
As for the proper benchmarks - I'm guessing on May 27th? Still don't see why they even announced the cards today tbh.
If 1080 is better than 980 sli, then maybe 1080ti is better than 980ti sli?
Not a chance, they have been smug-ing up the performance rumor threadsDon't make anybody with a 980ti feel bad. The 980 is going to run games at great levels for years to come.
Not a chance, they have been smug-ing up the performance rumor threads
You'll still benefit greatly from downsampling.