• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

MCV: Mario & Pokemon coming within 6 months of NX launch, 3rd parties, exec comment

Skiesofwonder

Walruses, camels, bears, rabbits, tigers and badgers.
If it's Galaxy 3 and Breath of the Wild within 6 months I might be interested. But I'm still not convinced about the hardware etc.. Need more information.

Miyamoto has stated it will be a completely new Mario so I imagine it won't be a sequel to Galaxy. I'm just hoping it's more galaxy-ish in ambition and less safe than 3D World. Don't get me wrong, I love 3D World. But Galaxy is on a whole other level.

Maybe Nintendo will finally take a crack at a 3D open-worldish platformer?
 

openrob

Member
Funny, both were strangely similar - flawless base mechanics, yet somewhat unmemorable and too similar to a previous game (3D Land, LttP).

Take that back!

SMB3DW was one of the best Mario games in a long long while amongst the monotony of the 'NEW' series.

We all know it's a good game, but for me it was actually a really memorable one.
 
Power talk is interesting but that is not the biggest part of this article.

"Nintendo seems set on trying to upgrade smartphone gamers."

This statement pushes harder at the basic design of the NX. It indirectly supports the Eurogamer article on the form factor and initial thoughts the average joe is going to have about the NX. To me, that is not good.

Nintendo can't let public opinion be that the NX is just a gamer phone. It needs to be seen as a console with benefits of taking gaming on the go or on your big screen. The content, controls and definitely launch advertising will make or break this console. Just as the failed advertising broke the WiiU.
 
Personally I still think I'll play Pokemon Moon on 3DS - obviously it'll be at least 5 months sooner, but the dual screen set-up is really helpful.

Miiiiight jump over for Pokemon Dazzling Diamond/Blue 2/Twilight/whatever, though.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
Umm... You said it had the highest budget for a Wii U exclusive. Why would you make such a claim like that but not classify it as a AAA budget game? I'm certain Super Smash Bros. for Wii U and Super Mario 3D World had a much higher budget.

AAA means in today's industry huge marketing budgets and big studios involved, hundreds of people. None of the Nintendo games qualifies as AAA, except maybe Zelda BoW.

SSB is technically not a Wii U exclusive.

But even so, what do you think was so expensive about SSB and SM3DW that wasn't done in Xenoblade X? X has huge environments both horizontally and vertically, a lot of detailed fauna, voice acting, soundtrack made from scratch, a lot of cut-scenes and using mostly new assets.
 

Bl@de

Member
Miyamoto has stated it will be a completely new Mario so I imagine it won't be a sequel to Galaxy. I'm just hoping it's more galaxy-ish in ambition and less safe than 3D World. Don't get me wrong, I love 3D World. But Galaxy is on a whole other level.

Maybe Nintendo will finally take a crack at a 3D open-worldish platformer?

I'm totally fine with Super Mario Universe :p But I want something like the gameplay of Galaxy, 64 etc.. Not a 3D version of a 2D Mario.
 

Comet

Member
It's either Pokemon "Eclipse", Pokemon Z, or the Diamond/Pearl remakes.

I really want a Mario Galaxy/Sunshine/64 type of Mario. The "3D Mario" series is really good but I prefer an open vast world to explore over self-contained smaller levels.
 
It's either Pokemon "Eclipse", Pokemon Z, or the Diamond/Pearl remakes.

I really want a Mario Galaxy/Sunshine/64 type of Mario. The "3D Mario" series is really good but I prefer an open vast world to explore over self-contained smaller levels.

.. or a VC launch of all previous Pokemon games plus Go.
 
Miyamoto has stated it will be a completely new Mario so I imagine it won't be a sequel to Galaxy. I'm just hoping it's more galaxy-ish in ambition and less safe than 3D World. Don't get me wrong, I love 3D World. But Galaxy is on a whole other level.

Maybe Nintendo will finally take a crack at a 3D open-worldish platformer?

I'm totally fine with Super Mario Universe :p But I want something like the gameplay of Galaxy, 64 etc.. Not a 3D version of a 2D Mario.

Before we can get to that point, I think Nintendo needs to stop being stubborn, suck it up and accept the fact that the 2D Mario crowd isn't going to magically start buying 3D Mario games just because they have a bunch of gameplay elements taken from them. As good as 3D Land and World are, they kinda failed at converting 2D Mario players into 3D (Compare their sales to the first two NSMB games and you'll see what I mean).

Let 3D Mario be 3D Mario, let 2D Mario be 2D Mario, and put the same amount of care and passion into both of them. If I see another NSMB game with a "bah bah" soundtrack....
 
I've never played a mainline Pokemon game, and unless the NX Pokemon game is Pokemon Snap 2, I'm not interested in it, but a new 3D Mario that goes away from Galaxy/SM3DW + BotW + interesting stuff from Sega and Squeenix sounds really good to me.

Like, a JSRF port/remake sounds PERFECT for this type of machine, for example!
 

MomoQca

Member
AAA means in today's industry huge marketing budgets and big studios involved, hundreds of people. None of the Nintendo games qualifies as AAA, except maybe Zelda BoW.

SSB is technically not a Wii U exclusive.

But even so, what do you think was so expensive about SSB and SM3DW that wasn't done in Xenoblade X? X has huge environments both horizontally and vertically, a lot of detailed fauna, voice acting, soundtrack made from scratch, a lot of cut-scenes and using mostly new assets.

You can't discount SSB to support your argument. You are forgetting one major thing: marketing. Compared to other major first party games, XCX had minimal marketing. Marketing takes up a huge chunk of a game's budget.

And despite what you think, Takahashi, the game's director, doesn't consider it to be a AAA game.
 
I'm still trying to discern Nintendo's strategy in Japan, specifically as it relates to their third party partners there. It seems most of them are focused on moving their brands to mobile, so I'm having a hard time accepting that we'll see a lot of third party exclusives that won't appear on phones for cheaper, especially if the NX's hardware is limited.
 
We haven't actually "seen" anything though... how can you act like you know anything?

We have pretty solid rumors corroborated by many valid sources (Eurogamer, WSJ, Semi-accurate, MCV). It's a certainty that what the NX is is what has been reported.over the past week. You would have to be a fool to doubt these at this point. While some outlets have slipped up (IGN Russia) most of the time, what they report independently tends to be accurate.

Every major console has their details leaked. PS4, Xbox One, Neo, Scorpio, even the Wii U and 3DS. And yeah Nintendo wants to keep the NX a secret on their own terms... so does Microsoft and Sony, hell every major company has these practices.

So yeah, we haven't seen anything. But at this point, there's little reason to doubt what's being rumored. This isn't a fan site or a no name redditor, these are major credible outlets. We know what the NX is now and unless your crazy or Jeff Rigby or something, there's very little reason to doubt any of this.
 

MacTag

Banned
Super Mario 3D World and A Link Between Worlds were released on THE SAME DAY as well.
Yes but different systems. There's also NSMB/Twilight Princess, Galaxy/Phantom Hourglass, NSMBWii/Spirit Tracks and 3D Land/Skyward Sword within 6 months of each other so it's less unusual on different systems.
 

MomoQca

Member
It's like you haven't even read my post. I'm done here, I can't argue against a wall.

I just re-read your post and now see your point. It's difficult to keep track of discussions especially on mobile. Your comment was a little rude. :/

Anyway, let's stop derailing the thread. However, I'm open to continuing the discussion via PM if you'd like to.
 

LordRaptor

Member
AAA means in today's industry huge marketing budgets and big studios involved, hundreds of people. None of the Nintendo games qualifies as AAA, except maybe Zelda BoW.

AAA is an investment term describing confidence in high rate of return.
This usually equates in gaming to a strong IP, a proven and / or talented studio, an extended development cycle, and a high marketing budget.

Most of Nintendos 'big names' are AAA titles.
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
AAA is an investment term describing confidence in high rate of return.

AAA used for games is not the same term as AAA for rating/investement, but rather the equivalent of the blockbuster for movies. This is at least my knowledge.

According to your definition Minecraft is a AAA game.
 

10k

Banned
AAA used for games is not the same term as AAA for rating/investement, but rather the equivalent of the blockbuster for movies. This is at least my knowledge.
I always hated the AAA term. Just call them blockbuster games or big budget games.
 
I wouldn't call the 3DS a sinking ship. The price of the main SKU is ridiculous especially when it doesn't include the charger and a game. (And I say this a owner of two of them) I somewhat understand the Wii U, but the issues with Wii U was that it lacked games in various genres.
I own both as well and yes, the 3DS is a sinking ship. I love its library but it's old with awful hardware and sales have been slowing down for a while. There isn't a reason to keep supporting it for another year.
 

LoveCake

Member
No 'new' Mario game at launch?

I am sorry but there is nothing in,
Nintendo is putting together a triple-A software lineup to ensure NX flies out of the gate next year.

Developer Game Freak will bring Pokemon to the platform, while Nintendo's first-party titles include the previously announced Zelda game - Breath of the Wild - and a new Mario game. All three products are scheduled to appear within the first six months of the machine's life.

The firm has also been busy securing third-party support with Sega, Square Enix, Ubisoft, Activision and Warner Bros already onboard.

that gives me any confidence, I fell for this when I picked up a WiiU at launch.
 
No 'new' Mario game at launch?

I am sorry but there is nothing in,


that gives me any confidence, I fell for this when I picked up a WiiU at launch.

Might wanna wait for Nintendo themselves to announce their launch lineup. This is a supposed leak from someone close to Nintendo, who may not know exactly what their plans are.

It's very likely we will at the very least also get a "gimmick game" a la Nintendo Land and Wii Sports. I'd be very surprised too if it's just that and Zelda at the launch, so I'd wait for the official announcement before being disappointed.
 

Oersted

Member
No 'new' Mario game at launch?

I am sorry but there is nothing in,


that gives me any confidence, I fell for this when I picked up a WiiU at launch.

There was no Zelda announced for launch.

Pokemon was not even in the cards.

The hell are you talking about?

Might wanna wait for Nintendo themselves to announce their launch lineup. This is a supposed leak from someone close to Nintendo, who may not know exactly what their plans are.

It's very likely we will at the very least also get a "gimmick game" a la Nintendo Land and Wii Sports. I'd be very surprised too if it's just that and Zelda at the launch, so I'd wait for the official announcement before being disappointed.

Zelda, Pokemon and Mario are disappointing now. The effing hell with some of you.
 
No 'new' Mario game at launch?

I am sorry but there is nothing in,


that gives me any confidence, I fell for this when I picked up a WiiU at launch.

tumblr_mrzy4qIdoi1qftbz5o1_500.gif
 
If they want S/M's third version (who knows if those are even a thing anymore) on NX with a lot more content/features like third versions usually do, then that's fine by me.

Kinda odd though. But I'll wait until I see something.

Mario is hype. Don't care what it is, as long as it's a good ass platformer.
 

Nanashrew

Banned
Going by dev cycle it makes sense that a new 3D Mario game would come out next year. I just figured everyone would have expected it by now.
 
There was no Zelda announced for launch.

Pokemon was not even in the cards.

The hell are you talking about?



Zelda, Pokemon and Mario are disappointing now. The effing hell with some of you.

I think that poster's issue was about launch day, not launch window. Zelda, Mario and Pokemon on an HD (presumably) console within 6 months of launch is borderline mind-blowing for me, so I'm quite happy.


Also re: Zelda at launch, I know it's not officially announced but I would think that their lack of announcing a Zelda release date is more about making sure the Wii U Zelda doesn't need to be pushed back in the event the NX is delayed, rather than having Zelda potentially miss the NX launch date.

That's just my theory though.
 

LoveCake

Member

It is not that really, I don't have any expectations (high or low) on NX system or NX games either first party or third party, I just feel that I can no longer trust what Nintendo say anymore, they said the same sort of things before the WiiU and 3DS launched and there were not many games released in the early months and the third parties (on WiiU) released just old ports other than ZombiU.

I am sorry for sounding negative about the NX and games, but it is just the way I feel, there is a majority saying how excited they are for the NX and games, just as I was with the WiiU, but how much of this excitement will translate into NX purchases on release day, or is everyone just going to sit back to see what happens games release-wise and as NX sales stall third parties get cold feet and the cycle continues.

imo, The NX needs to launch with about twenty full sized games at launch spread across first party and third party games and at least ten of these not ports or up-grades/dates spread across multiple genres.

I cannot see how the NX cannot release with Zelda: Breath of the Wild and a 'new' Mario game and three or four new Nintendo franchise games on launch day.
 

10k

Banned
It says in the quote in the OP,
Developer Game Freak will bring Pokemon to the platform.
Nintendo's first-party titles include the previously announced Zelda game, I take this to mean 'The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild'.



It is not that really, I don't have any expectations on NX games for at least the first year or so, either first party or third party, I feel that I can no longer trust what Nintendo say, they said the same sort of things before the WiiU and 3DS launched and there were not many games released in the early months and the third parties (on WiiU) released just old ports other than ZombiU.

I am sorry for sounding negative about the NX and games, but it is just the way I feel, there is a majority saying how excited they are for the NX and games, just as I was with the WiiU, but how much of this excitement will translate into NX purchases on release day, or is everyone just going to sit back to see what happens games release-wise and as NX sales stall third parties get cold feet and the cycle continues.
The western third parties are gonna play wait and see for the sales performance anyways.

Afaik the Japanese third parties, indies and Nintendo themselves will be coming full force from day one.
 

Oersted

Member
It says in the quote in the OP,
Developer Game Freak will bring Pokemon to the platform.
Nintendo's first-party titles include the previously announced Zelda game, I take this to mean 'The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild'.

You don't understand.

You said you fell for this with WiiU.

There was no rumour/announcement of Pokemon for WiiU.

There was no rumour/announcement of Zelda for WiiU launch.

NSMBU was announced for and released WiiU at launch.


The hell did you fell for?
 

LordRaptor

Member
AAA used for games is not the same term as AAA for rating/investement, but rather the equivalent of the blockbuster for movies. This is at least my knowledge.

According to your definition Minecraft is a AAA game.

AAA is used by gamers because gaming magazines started using it.
Gaming magazines started using it because it was frequently used by game publishers stakeholders in reference to their biggest games, which were the titles expected to perform well, which also tended to be the titles that reviewed well.

Minecraft was not a AAA title by that definition, because it had no publisher nor stakeholder expectations attached.
Minecraft ports and any subsequent sequel definitely would be considered AAA.
 

Dr. Worm

Banned
So, if Pokemon is coming to NX in 2017, what's the point of Gen VII on 3DS in 2016?

You'd think they would've just put out Z this year and waited for the next gen.
 
So, if Pokemon is coming to NX in 2017, what's the point of Gen VII on 3DS in 2016?

You'd think they would've just put out Z this year and waited for the next gen.

Wanting to make the holiday rush, give the 3DS a last dying breath, actually make it out for the anniversary year, strike the Go iron while it's hot (or, well... by November, probably warm at best...), NX was originally planned for 2016 and then delayed until 2017, etc.

I think the main speculation going on was that Pokemon Z was planned at first, but then they canned it to focus on having Sun and Moon for 2016, and just incorporated stuff like Zygarde's forms into it?
 

Sadist

Member
Oh come on

Who in their right mind are expecting a 3D Mario game at launch?

Nintendo won't blow their load on launch day.
 
imo, The NX needs to launch with about twenty full sized games at launch spread across first party and third party games and at least ten of these not ports or up-grades/dates spread across multiple genres.

I cannot see how the NX cannot release with Zelda: Breath of the Wild and a 'new' Mario game and three or four new Nintendo franchise games on launch day.
This is rediculous. BotW plus whatever on day one and Mario and Pokémon coming later is perfectly fine.
 

KenOD

a kinder, gentler sort of Scrooge
Oh I read this title too fast and thought they had announced a Mario & Luigi sequel with Luigi becoming a Pokemon.

Now I'm sad this isn't happening despite the good news of support early on.
 
Top Bottom