That's what I have and I love it.http://www.bestbuy.com/site/vizio-5...lack/4352100.p?id=1219736059154&skuId=4352100
2160p (4k) w/ HDR. 50 inches at 999 dollars.
Bingo.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/vizio-5...lack/4352100.p?id=1219736059154&skuId=4352100
2160p (4k) w/ HDR. 50 inches at 999 dollars.
The wood stack on the left in the first image is blurry as fuck
Without HDR, but with Game Mode on, it's somewhere in the low 20s. Unfortunately, there aren't any 4k TVs that have low input lag with both Game Mode + HDR on.How's the input lag?
Well, besides RE, there really aren't any games that involve zombies but have a great focus on story. Most zombie games out are basically survival games that have little to no story.Looks pretty amazing. Still disappointed it's a game about zombies.
Can somebody tell me a great 4K TV in the 1000-1500 range that I can buy that will be good for the next 5 years? Lol
Without HDR, but with Game Mode on, it's somewhere in the low 20s. Unfortunately, there aren't any 4k TVs that have low input lag with both Game Mode + HDR on.
Well, I think the Samsung KS9800 does, though I'm not sure.
According to Rting's review, 1080p content look great with the P-Series. It's only 480p and 720p that don't look as great. If you're going to be using the TV for consoles and movies, 60hz is fine.Samsung KS8000 (Rtings review) is the best value in that range. I would stay away from Vizio as its scaling tech is poor so 720p and 1080p content doesn't work as well. Samsung and Sony have the best scaling tech at the moment. Samsung is also a 120 hz TV while the Vizio P Series is a 60hz television at 50 inches and uses an IPS display (worse color/black levels) at 55 inches. You don't get a good quality display AND 120hz with the Vizio P Series unless you are willing to go to 65 inches or higher which is $2,000.
The wood stack on the left in the first image is blurry as fuck
Isn't the game shit though?
edit: confused it for 7 Days to Die :/
True. I mean, you can do both Game Mode + HDR on say the Vizio P-Series, but input lag jumps to around 60ms. I wonder if that can be fixed/lowered with firmware updates.Kind of pointless without using HDR isn't it? That's half the selling point of the 4K TVs your missing out on a massively bigger color palette
Dear god this game looks amazing
Samsung KS8000 (Rtings review) is the best value in that range. I would stay away from Vizio as its scaling tech is poor so 720p and 1080p content doesn't work as well. Samsung and Sony have the best scaling tech at the moment. Samsung is also a 120 hz TV while the Vizio P Series is a 60hz television at 50 inches and uses an IPS display (worse color/black levels) at 55 inches. You don't get a good quality display AND 120hz with the Vizio P Series unless you are willing to go to 65 inches or higher which is $2,000.
JPEG compression?
That's the best part of this method, it's temporal stability. Many reconstruction techniques don't hold up in motion.
Having it as a fast dedicated built in hardware for reconstruction leaving most of the hassle out of devs hands outside mostly wanting to do it not, that is a brilliant design decision.
According to Rting's review, 1080p content look great with the P-Series. It's only 480p and 720p that don't look as great. If you're going to be using the TV for consoles and movies, 60hz is fine.
True. I mean, you can do both Game Mode + HDR on say the Vizio P-Series, but input lag jumps to around 60ms. I wonder if that can be fixed/lowered with firmware updates.
Still pretty bad input lag. I'm assuming this will continue to improve over the years?
Probably doesn't help, but that blur is due to the upscaling technique.
That is good input lag for a 4k TV. The best TV's are all around 20 ms. But yeah it isn't at the single digit levels you can get from a good PC monitor.
Still pretty bad input lag. I'm assuming this will continue to improve over the years?
That is good input lag for a 4k TV. The best TV's are all around 20 ms. But yeah it isn't at the single digit levels you can get from a good PC monitor.
Assuming you are referring to response time and not input lag, PC monitors are not really better than TVs. Their advertised response time is false/misleading. We measure response time in a very strict way, and so our measurements can't really be compared to other methods. As for input lag, TVs are generally higher than monitors, but most people won't notice an input lag below 50ms.
Aren't all tv broadcastings 60hz? Honest question, but how would a 120hz tv make that better? Seeing both reviews, the Samsung gray uniformity is a bit better than the Vizio's. I honestly thought most broadcasts were 1080p by now.A lot of broadcast TV is still at 720p. I watch a lot of hockey so 120hz and good 720p was really important to me. The Samsung also has better gray uniformity which was a big problem and caused me to return 2 Sony TV's before spending the money on the Samsung.
Yeah, it is. I do hope it can be improved with updates. Samsung may have one that has a lower input lag with both options on, but I'm not sure.Eeeehhhh that's a little too high
God, this whole HDR with UHD with game mode working at the same time has made tv buying such a pain. I'm pretty sure I'm down to two series of models lol. It's slim pickings for gaming really it seems
Digging it. What's the location of the game btw?
22ms is absolutely fine. No one is noticing that shit, I don't give a fuck how sensitive you are.
Yea I guess I shouldn't be comparing them to monitors.
Will they ever get there though?
20ms for gaming? I'm sorry but that's just awful. Obviously computer screens will always be faster, but to say that a response time 4-5 times slower than a computer screen is great is kind of mind boggling. Until a non OLED TV can get their response time to less than 10 ms you really can't give a TV a score higher than a 6 in gaming.
- Assuming you are referring to response time and not input lag, PC monitors are not really better than TVs. Their advertised response time is false/misleading. We measure response time in a very strict way, and so our measurements can't really be compared to other methods. As for input lag, TVs are generally higher than monitors, but most people won't notice an input lag below 50ms.
Does anyone have the uncompressed video of what they showed of it at the Meeting?
Aren't all tv broadcastings 60hz? Honest question, but how would a 120hz tv make that better? Seeing both reviews, the Samsung gray uniformity is a bit better than the Vizio's. I honestly thought most broadcasts were 1080p by now.
Pacific northwest of the United States.
I'm sorry, I meant the highest it can go.Not in America.
Of course some people notice it, but if you don't then that's fine.
Come on PC Come on PC.
......dont buy a PS4 Pro...... steady......steady...
This was Rtings response in the Q/A section of that review
Suuuure they do. I'd love a blind taste test between 20ms and 10. I'd wager 99% of people who claim they can notice a difference would fail.
huh? the Bestbuy link shows the P series has 120 hz at 50 inches as well.Samsung KS8000 (Rtings review) is the best value in that range. I would stay away from Vizio as its scaling tech is poor so 720p and 1080p content doesn't work as well. Samsung and Sony have the best scaling tech at the moment. Samsung is also a 120 hz TV while the Vizio P Series is a 60hz television at 50 inches and uses an IPS display (worse color/black levels) at 55 inches. You don't get a good quality display AND 120hz with the Vizio P Series unless you are willing to go to 65 inches or higher which is $2,000.
Sony 1st Party IP. It's PS4-only.Come on PC Come on PC.
......dont buy a PS4 Pro...... steady......steady...
Rtings also says only the 50" is 60hz.huh? the Bestbuy link shows the P series has 120 hz at 50 inches as well.
The difference is that the people over at Rtings seem to be professionals.This seems like a "most people won't notice framerate over 60fps" kind of post.
I and many other notice these things, 50MS is a lot!