orthodoxy1095
Banned
That's not an explanation of a legal right or precedent.They can't stop people from talking about a fangame, but an awards show is giving it commercial/professional recognition. Fanarts are mostly tolerated when they don't generate income/competition.
It doesn't seem like it's so much a matter of an actual "right," but them just exercising pressure as a sponsor/participant.
I wouldn't go so far as to say the awards/results are actually bought, although that's not really unusual in the world of media rewards, but I definitely don't love the look of nominees being able to be changed.Yeah, I doubt very much Nintendo have any sort of legal "right" to do this.
If they're applying pressure as a sponsor to alter the results of the awards, it basically makes the whole TGAs look as worthless as some people thought they already were.
If awards can be bought and sold through sponsorship (which is exactly what this looks like until Geoff or somebody comes forward and explains otherwise, and the appearance of impropriety is as bad as actual impropriety) then what's even the point?