Glass Rebel
Member
I feel compelled to quote myself from earlier..
ugh, hardin fucking portbeggin
I feel compelled to quote myself from earlier..
If it was because of that then this thread would of been shutdown before it even hit 1000.Right, and do we have a mod stating the reason for the thread being closed ? Cause it could just be because the discussion going nowhere or the video being dubious at best.
cause there's a ps3 version tooSoo, do we know now why there's no exclusivity label on the PS4 cover of Persona 5?
Because as far as i know, that's where all the (heavy) speculation about a Switch version started from
Here are the games you cited:
RDR2 is a multiplat game.
KH3 is a multiplat game.
Ni-Oh was labeled as a "Console Exclusive" game.
Ni No Kuni 2 was labeled as a "Console Debut" game.
AC7 was said by the producer that it wasn't exclusive (we learned 2 days ago it's rated for XB1 too).
As for DQ11, I haven't seen PC portbegging for it. Citation needed.
As for P5 and Bloodborne, right, they never made sense. But that's basically what you could put in the "port begging basket" that you see everywhere. The very same we saw for XCom 2, Bayonetta 2, BGE2, Undertale, SFV, Scalebound or any other exclusives. This isn't tied to specific support. Also on your last part, that's arguable. Both platforms have their own japanese support. There are many good Japanese releases that aren't on PS4 either but on PC.
On 8 releases, there's 5 of them that had legitimate reasons to raise questions on platforms availability. 2 of them made no sense to question that (and are part of the many ones exemples you can find elsewhere). 1 needs a citation.
You make it as if it was a widespread issue, concerning only PC and PS4. That's silly and baseless.
Actually, the Japanese third party games on Steam comfortably outnumber those on PS4.
Soo, do we know now why there's no exclusivity label on the PS4 cover of Persona 5?
Because as far as i know, that's where all the (heavy) speculation about a Switch version started from
I wouldn't call the developer stupid, but depending of the situation/reason, the decision itself ? sure I would.
A small dev who want to work on a new project right away, and can't take the financial risk of making the port by another company, that make sense.
Taking an exclusivity deal, because it's far easier ( marketing deal, etc ) or because you think it will end up more profitable that way, sure I guess.
Not wanting more people to enjoy your game, and you getting more money out of it, because .. nothing ? now that stupid.
Since we announced it for the PS4, people have been holding out hope for a PC version, despite me repeatedly saying otherwise. Turns out, some people aren't easily accepting of the lack of a PC version.
cause there's a ps3 version too
Isn't it also coming to PS3?
People want what they can't have or something like thatHow has this thread hit 30 pages already?
No, I only said all those games are not coming out on PC atm and the result is portbegging. NiOh was specifically labelled by TK themselves as a PS4 exclusive and I distinctly remember you trying to deny that.
How has this thread hit 30 pages already?
Not sad. that's for sure since I'm ok with atlus not porting it the same way ppl aren't ok wih atlus not porting it
Must have started the port begging when the game was announced for ps3...How has this thread hit 30 pages already?
Yeah, people are thirsty.You know what's more annoying than portbegging?
People arguing about who portbegs the most
How has this thread hit 30 pages already?
1500 replies already? This thread only came out yesterday.
Yeah, people are thirsty.
People must really want Yakuza and Persona.
If Yakuza 0 ends up on PC, I just know that everyone who posted in this thread is gonna buy it.
1500 replies already? This thread only came out yesterday.
Yeah, people are thirsty.
Even the ppl talking about future ps4 emulation will need to buy it if they don't plan to play a pirated game...People must really want Yakuza and Persona.
If Yakuza 0 ends up on PC, I just know that everyone who posted in this thread is gonna buy it.
Even the ppl talking about future ps4 emulation will need to buy it if they don't plan to play a pirated game...
Or, you know, maybe, you're the first person in this thread that's talking about PS4 emulation.
Even the ppl talking about future ps4 emulation will need to buy it if they don't plan to play a pirated game...
He is not.
Yes, preservation is great indeed. I don't even see your point. There's many great games that, today, would've disappeared without PC versions or emulation.
There are still people waiting for PS3 emulation to become stable JUST to play Demon's Souls. They're that adamant against buying a console. It's gonna be the latter.
Thanks Atlus.
PS3 emulation can't come soon enough.
He is not.
All mentions of emulation in this thread
ALL THE PEOPLE
The last couple of pages have been about what counts as port begging. Even the mod had to come in say that. All the valid points have been said within the first dozen pages. Now we are just going in circles because there really isn't anything new to discuss.Or maybe, maybe an actual discussion is going on.
How has this thread hit 30 pages already?
Or maybe, maybe an actual discussion is going on.
Were they very expected? I didn't think so? Sure it's a bummer for those who hoped otherwise but doesn't seem like a huge deal to me.
Decently popular franchises with very loud fanbases, at least.I'd like to think it's because P5 and Yakuza have become extremely popular franchises.
Game isn't coming to two of the most vocal fanbases on gaf.
Decently popular franchises with very loud fanbases, at least.
He most likely is. Just did a search of the first 10 pages for the word emulation. It comes up once in reference to older games being emulated preserved their legacy and once again by a console-only poster about ps3 emulation.
Only one of those posts is actually the straw man that the poster is talking about.
You asked if he was the first well clearly he wasn't, just pointed that out.
As am I. But how are they rumored? Who is spreading the rumors. If Sony and Atlus Japan came out and said sorry for the bad labels but the games are for PS4 only. Would you believe that?That and you dropping 31 posts of your own in for good measure, I guess?
I have 38 (now 39), but I'm not trying to paint myself as above it all. I'm in this thread to talk about the topic of rumored PC ports for Yakuza 0 and Persona 5, two games I know I will enjoy and eventually own regardless of platform, why businesses decide not to put games on certain platforms, and how well similar games do when they do get ports.
He was the first one to mention PS4 emulation.
Amen to that. Persona 4 is my favorite game of all time and I own Yakuza 3-5. I am hungry over hereDecently popular franchises with very loud fanbases, at least.
This thread has basically doubled down into the worst thing ever.
PC gamers and Switch owners have a right to voice their opinions about Hardin's post, as irritated as it may make some people feel.
I get being annoyed that there are people not willing to support the original release, but this game is not a Sony funded title, or a game that specifically owes it existence to Sony, has no actual co marketing or co partnership deals with Sony, and really has any real excuse for only being PS3/PS4 outside of Atlus Japan's particular brand of conservatism in regards to how they do business in particular.
So again, as much as it may trigger you(and TBH it triggers me a bit too, dont think i dont understand) to hear dumb posts like "I only hold onto my PS4 cause so it collects dust, refuse to support PS4 titles cause they are currently Playstation only" or "Atlus is stupid for not investing in the specific gaming platform i like and therefore they are dumb", its not a riduclous viewpoint for people to be annoyed at Atlus living in the 1990s on this front.
And this just backs up what I said earlier. Nothing new is being said. All the good stuff has been noted within the first dozen pages.This has all been covered already. Rumors came out of reactions to the differences in how the PS exclusive vs. console exclusive labeling has been used in the past, with games like Street Fighter V as an example.
Now, it looks like there's more to it than people previously thought, but we had a run of games that confirmed this in the past.
See, that's how a rumor starts. It isn't confirmation, because that's the nature of a rumor.
Yakuza has always been a Playstation console title. The team does one game a year and then quickly moves onto the next. Even getting a localisation out of them was difficult. I think after Sega acquired Atlus, they shifted localisation to Atlus and thats how we were able to get 3 more Yakuza games. There's probably nothing in place right now to do a PC or Switch port. John Hardin just doesn't want you guys to be waiting and spreading fake news for a Switch/PC port. In short if you have a PS4 don't wait on these games. I know I'm not.
I agree, Sega/Atlus is leaving money on the table.
Yes, its unfortunate its not gonna be ported, but lets not kid here. It isn't gonna set the PC world on fire either. P5 would sell modestly, but Yakuza. I honestly don't see that selling well.
People who already own a PS4, but choose not to get it. I don't even understand this lol.
Were they very expected? I didn't think so? Sure it's a bummer for those who hoped otherwise but doesn't seem like a huge deal to me.
Yakuza has always been a Playstation console title. The team does one game a year and then quickly moves onto the next. Even getting a localisation out of them was difficult. I think after Sega acquired Atlus, they shifted localisation to Atlus and thats how we were able to get 3 more Yakuza games. There's probably nothing in place right now to do a PC or Switch port. John Hardin just doesn't want you guys to be waiting and spreading fake news for a Switch/PC port. In short if you have a PS4 don't wait on these games. I know I'm not.
I think that is what makes some PS4 players upset. Watching people pass on Yakuza/nioh because of rumors of a pc version. Though nioh has the highest chance to come to pcI agree, Sega/Atlus is leaving money on the table.
Yes, its unfortunate its not gonna be ported, but lets not kid here. It isn't gonna set the PC world on fire either. P5 would sell modestly, but Yakuza. I honestly don't see that selling well.
People who already own a PS4, but choose not to get it. I don't even understand this lol.
This has all been covered already (which you probably should know, since you've been all over this thread). Rumors came out of reactions to the differences in how the PS exclusive vs. console exclusive labeling has been used in the past, with games like Street Fighter V as an example.
People who already own a PS4, but choose not to get it. I don't even understand this lol.
I think that is what makes some PS4 players upset. Watching people pass on Yakuza/nioh because of rumors of a pc version. Though nioh has the highest chance to come to pc
Watching people pass on Yakuza/nioh because of rumors of a pc version.
Game isn't coming to two of the most vocal fanbases on gaf.
but it's already on the PS4
I think that is what makes some PS4 players upset. Watching people pass on Yakuza/nioh because of rumors of a pc version. Though nioh has the highest chance to come to pc
Bingo. It's okay to want them on there but at the end of the day these are niche games that need the support that are at least coming to a system where people like these games and there are no real rumors of PC or even Switch versions for either of them and yet you've got people saying screw that wait for fantasy and generally unlikely PC versions, Nioh being published by Sony now and let alone Persona and Yakuza, both console (sometimes handheld with Atlus) titles by devs who don't work on PC.
What in god's name is a "real rumor"?
Does it have to be one of those rumors that is 99.9% confirmed to count as a "real rumor"?