A Link to the Past
Banned
They are taking a political stance. It's pretty straightforward.
It isn't to him/her. And if he/she feels they need to take their business elsewhere, like they did for chick fil a, due to the corporation starting getting political, then it's their right. I agree with him/her in that I dislike when companies and celebrities/executives get into politics. They all have a right to express their beliefs and support, of course, but I don't really care for them. Their reality is different than mostly everybody else, so I really couldn't care less what they say. I won't go as far as Darryl and boycott companies and whatnot, mainly because I don't think that does anything. I already don't go to Alamo or eat at chic fil a, but for different reasons. If they were my go to places, I would still keep going there provided they kept providing me the service I wanted and expected, even if I disagreed with their political stances.
People weren't upset that Chick Fil A was political
People were upset that their politics were anti-gay
Please, please, people, stop making a comparison between activism for people and activism against people. Alamo Drafthouse is celebrating women, Chick Fil A is denigrating gay people. It's a false equivalence.