• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Waypoint: 'Shadow of War' and 'Forza 7' Are Poisoning the Concept of Loot Boxes

jayu26

Member
Forza doesn't have real money loot boxes though. I feel like a lot of people don't know that.

Just because some suit ran a projection and found out that not having "real money loot boxes" at the launch of the game will result in better metacritic score doesn't mean that that won't be in game. Your post is even crazier considering they have themselves said that they are coming.
 
It's not about a random prize but having this in a full priced game.

The way they design the game is to spend money when things get difficult, just like f2p games.

I won't defend bad implementations and if that's the case it's pretty awful. I've always said make it all about cosmetics and have it fund development of features to keep the community from being split by DLC. About it being in full price games....I mean I'm not crazy about it but games like CoD and Destiny have very expensive DLC anyway. IF they made those free then i would be okay with cosmetic only lootboxes. But those companies will probably go for both.
 

Rizific

Member
i feel like im the crazy one who just doesnt give a single shit about loot boxes. i dont support them, so i dont buy them. is there something wrong with my brain?
 
I think it's an interesting proposition when non-invasive loot boxes are used as the revenue stream to provide everyone else with free content. I think people would feel better if they knew that was the case.

I think when it comes to off setting ballooning development costs for AAA games it's not the worst. Overwatch is fine but when it's gameplay content or in a game that also has paid dlc irs a problem
 

hawk2025

Member
I won't defend bad implementations and if that's the case it's pretty awful. I've always said make it all about cosmetics and have it fund development of features to keep the community from being split by DLC. About it being in full price games....I mean I'm not crazy about it but games like CoD and Destiny have very expensive DLC anyway. IF they made those free then i would be okay with cosmetic only lootboxes. But those companies will probably go for both.


I’ll switch analogies: It’s like the mayor in Jaws trying to justify keeping the beaches open.

Except we’re already in the third act and the shark has eaten half the boat.
 

joeyjoejoe

Neo Member
Car games have locked higher tier cars behind other tiers and unlocks for years... I don't see the issue. Disagree with me if you want but these developers realize the majority of their gamers are NOT going to partake in these loot boxes, real money or not.

They have the data that shows 90% of players dont finish the game and how many players actually partake in loot boxes. They are working to balance out the whales that'll pay and the scrubs that'll just play. Can you play the game, start to finish, have a good time and not need to unlock a level to beat the game? Awesome. Do i need to grind 100% achievements to get special ending? Okay thats a normal thing too.

You guys get too caught up in this bullshit IMO.
 
"Once we confirm that the game economy is balanced and fun for our players out in the wild," said the studio, "we plan to offer Tokens [a real-money currency that works like CR] as a matter of player choice. Some players appreciate using Tokens as a way of gaining immediate access to content that may take many hours to acquire in the normal course of play. There will also be an option within the in-game menu to turn off Tokens entirely."

This really fucking grinds my gears for multiple reasons. These pure scumbags deliberately leave out the micro-transactions from the launch game so the reviewers dont call them out for it and give the game a bad name.

It gets patched in later once they have their 85 on Metacritic or whatever. So anyone who buys this is gonna have to deal with it unless they are done with the game in a few days.

There is no set price on this. They can "fine tune" it later so that what is cheap and easy to get today with the launch game and no micro-transactions can easily be a nightmare grind once they start charging people for it.

In a lot of cases like these its not even paid DLC that you can buy. Its basically random ass loot crates where you pay for a chance to get something good. Just straight up gambling.

And they have the FUCKING nerve to pretend like its a pro consumer move.

JUST. FUCK. OFF!
 

Brandon F

Well congratulations! You got yourself caught!
Yep, avoiding all of them this holiday. Thankfully enough great alternatives are available in 2017, but I am really bummed at Forza 7 and (possibly) BF2 if that one turns out equally as dour. Those were easy purchases for me months ago, the easiest. Now I am feeling glad I held off on pre-ordering.
 
WOW. THE GALL OF THOSE TWO GAMES. HOW DARE THEY POISON THE CONCEPT OF LOOT BOXES. ITS INHUMANE. ITS ROBBERY. ITS BLATANT THIEVERY. ITS WRONG. TAXATION IS THEFT.


-_-

Sure, I'll feed the troll.

Show me where the revenue from loot boxes goes to building public transit, improving health care, funding social security, maintaining core infrastructure like highways and ports, or any of the million other things that tax dollars do to improve our lives. You can't? Surprise, it's because your analogy to anti-tax activists is completely nonsensical and hysterical!

We already know what a Forza game without loot boxes might look like. It's called OLDER FORZA GAMES. People have looked at what you get in Forza 7 and found the benefits wanting. Loot boxes don't even justify their own existence.
 
msty.gif


Fuck all full price games with loot boxes especially if they influence gameplay.
 

danm999

Member
Does the game ever force you to spend money? No. I'm sure you can get to the end of Shadow Wars without spending a dime, as long as you're patient and persistent. But locking progress through this mode (and, again, toward the game's true ending) behind either spending more money or doing tons of tedious busywork feels at least greedy if not predatory."

Unsurprising to see Monolith's assurances the loot box monetisation not impacting gameplay balance or flow was well, bullshit.
 

jman2050

Member
It doesn't matter how "fair" certain lootbox implementations are now.

This isn't about now. When practices like this become accepted and even expected then that gives these companies free license to go from "fair" to not quite as fair and beyond because why not? Because some vocal minority will get mad at you when you've already got a fully addicted contingent of whales caught hook, line, and sinker?
 
Yeah another post here to say I'm not really going to pick hairs too much over which games have the 'better' system, or if one game is more 'poisonous' than another, as the moment a paid for game has microtransactions it is a problem. That might be extreme to some but until I see a paid game that is made better with microtransactions my opinion will remain the same. Keep them in free to play games where they originated and are justified in.
Agreed. 100%
 
Unsurprising to see Monolith's assurances the loot box monetisation not impacting gameplay balance or flow was well, bullshit.

Yeah, what a crock of shit that was. You have some poor dev come out and push the corporate line only to find out the entire ending of the game is a grind without paying.
 

Imbarkus

As Sartre noted in his contemplation on Hell in No Exit, the true horror is other members.
It doesn't matter how "fair" certain lootbox implementations are now.

This isn't about now. When practices like this become accepted and even expected then that gives these companies free license to go from "fair" to not quite as fair and beyond because why not? Because some vocal minority will get mad at you when you've already got a fully addicted contingent of whales caught hook, line, and sinker?

It's as if people forgot the whole purpose of starting down this whole slippery slope: once the mechanisms are in place it's really easy to slide past the next milestone.
 

Gator86

Member
This really fucking grinds my gears for multiple reasons. These pure scumbags deliberately leave out the micro-transactions from the launch game so the reviewers dont call them out for it and give the game a bad name.

It gets patched in later once they have their 85 on Metacritic or whatever. So anyone who buys this is gonna have to deal with it unless they are done with the game in a few days.

There is no set price on this. They can "fine tune" it later so that what is cheap and easy to get today with the launch game and no micro-transactions can easily be a nightmare grind once they start charging people for it.

In a lot of cases like these its not even paid DLC that you can buy. Its basically random ass loot crates where you pay for a chance to get something good. Just straight up gambling.

And they have the FUCKING nerve to pretend like its a pro consumer move.

JUST. FUCK. OFF!

Also, that quote is hilarious because cheat codes used to exist for people who want to skip stuff. You're not doing us a favor by removing cheat codes, waiting a few years, then selling temporary cheat codes back to us for real money. Eat shit.

People might respond to developers/publishers with less toxicity if they didn't try and insult our intelligence with every PR spin and company blog post.
 
You can't poison something that is already garbage. And I still can't believe people defend Overwatch when it's massive success is a huge reason why this is infecting everything.
 

Gee

Member
I’ll just buy a ‘complete’ version dirt cheap in a year, or skip it. This is not a trend I will be supporting.
 

kafiend

Member
From what I'm getting, that's where the time-saving comes in. Either you spend the time to get them to legendary, or you buy them.

Yeah. If you are unemployed then you have all the time in the world to bypass any form of loot crate with an artificially lengthened grind to gain the same item that money could buy you.
If you have a job but no time then just spend the money you earnt today in the game you already paid for.
If you have no time because you have kids, then make them do the grind for you while you get some quality time down the casino.
 

Kintaro

Worships the porcelain goddess
You can't poison something that is already garbage. And I still can't believe people defend Overwatch when it's massive success is a huge reason why this is infecting everything.

This very forum was ABLAZE with Overwatch Lootbox debate awhile back. Now, it seems to have settled into "Well, OW got it right. Cosmetic only..."

As if Cosmetics aren't part of the fuckin' game too.
 

Gator86

Member
This very forum was ABLAZE with Overwatch Lootbox debate awhile back. Now, it seems to have settled into "Well, OW got it right. Cosmetic only..."

As if Cosmetics aren't part of the fuckin' game too.

Defense force goalpost moving did real damage on this one. Congrats to them, I guess.
 

dralla

Member
You can't poison something that is already garbage. And I still can't believe people defend Overwatch when it's massive success is a huge reason why this is infecting everything.

Overwatch does loot boxes correctly. Everything obtained from them are cosmetic and have no impact on the gameplay itself and Blizzard continues to put out free content from the money they are making off the loot boxes. Overwatch is also a $40 game (on PC).
 

jem0208

Member
I think in some games, particularly early pioneers of the concept, there's an undercurrent of people knowing that this will mean other people are paying for their free map updates, new gear and bonus or postlaunch content in general. Like the same amount of dlc is coming out, but a minority of users are paying disproportionate sums so that the majority gets them free which is an attractive prospect.
I'm perfectly happy to have lootboxes if it means that DLC maps and content are free.

Ie: Halo 5 or Siege's system.
 
This very forum was ABLAZE with Overwatch Lootbox debate awhile back. Now, it seems to have settled into "Well, OW got it right. Cosmetic only..."

As if Cosmetics aren't part of the fuckin' game too.

Option A : Cosmetics only (CSGO/Overwatch)
Option B : Gameplay content locked behind Microtransactions (Shadow of whatever/Forza)
Option C : Straight up advantage in MP games (SW BF2)

Ideal scenario, none of this would exist. But you can see why gamers would go for the least offensive of the three.
 

RedShift

Member
Why aren't these regulated like gambling machines?

Really hope the EU or someone get involved and put an end to this scummy practice.
 
i feel like im the crazy one who just doesnt give a single shit about loot boxes. i dont support them, so i dont buy them. is there something wrong with my brain?

No, you're a normal consumer. Most people dont think about developers artificially enhancing the grind necessary for the rewards and wouldnt have any idea that publishers hire mental health professionals to help exploit gambling addictions in gamers. (Many of which are children).

As a consumer, you shouldnt have to worry about these things because it should be regulated but the law hasn't caught up to it yet.
 

tsundoku

Member
The Waypoint staff is awash with the exact kind of "game player" that buys lootboxes and these awful "I have more affluence then time" micro transactions.

The concept of loot boxes weren't poisoned, loot boxes ARE poison.
 

tuxfool

Banned
This very forum was ABLAZE with Overwatch Lootbox debate awhile back. Now, it seems to have settled into "Well, OW got it right. Cosmetic only..."

As if Cosmetics aren't part of the fuckin' game too.

While this is true, there are degrees of awfulness.

Everybody has their own red line when it comes to this stuff.
 
Option A : Cosmetics only (CSGO/Overwatch)
Option B : Gameplay content locked behind Microtransactions (Shadow of whatever/Forza)
Option C : Straight up advantage in MP games (SW BF2)

Ideal scenario, none of this would exist. But you can see why gamers would go for the least offensive of the three.
Option D: Titanfall 2. Only cosmetics. No RNG -- buy exactly what you want. No season pass. All modes, maps and Titans free.
Option E: Make the game free-to-play to begin with.
 

tuxfool

Banned
i feel like im the crazy one who just doesnt give a single shit about loot boxes. i dont support them, so i dont buy them. is there something wrong with my brain?

Yes. You're naive.

In a perfect world you'd be free to be naive, but this isn't a perfect world. Saying you don't engage with lootboxes hasn't prevented the the likes of SoM or Forza 7 from making their game design worse in order to accommodate lootboxes.
 

Stevey

Member
I've not bought one in Forza 7 yet and I'm enjoying the game and dont feel like I'm missing out on anything.
I wonder how many people have actually played the games in question before forming an opinion on them.
 

tuxfool

Banned
Like fucking clockwork.

"If games dont transform into online casino's then they'll die!" god damn.

I've not bought one in Forza 7 yet and I'm enjoying the game and dont feel like I'm missing out on anything.
I wonder how many people have actually played the games in question before forming an opinion on them.

And another one "I don't notice it so it isn't a big deal."

Except for the fact that the game is objectively worse than the last iteration in some key aspects.
 
Top Bottom