As I said, both lists keep growing, there are even games released the last few days that are 4k,
that still does not make them true 4k consoles across the board and that certainly does not mean that PS5 games will show little difference between current gen games and this one, which was the point.....
So what will PS5 be marketed as if not a true 4k box? 4k meaning across the board.....PS4 was 1080p across the board, PRO and XBONEX are not 4k across the board....PRO and XBONEX won't have the asset quality you will see in PS5 games, the physics etc...So every other gen people were able to see the difference except the PS5 gen? All because of XBONEX..amirite?
Is anybody else reading this, what does this mean? So a Zen will only give 2x perf over a jaguar relative to framerate and thats still negligible to you??? So you minimize a 30 to 60fps divide, but on top of that you fail to see that a better CPU also offers better physics, AI, drawcalls on top of better framerates....So you expect ground up 4k games with 4k assets with enhanced physics and AI to be comparable to 1080p games at medium quality rezzed up to 4k and DR resolutions? So of course, it makes sense to say or predict that PS5 will only have 16GB of ram and it will only be 8-9TF, because you are now on that "the difference won't be much train".... Is it just like there isn't much difference between the 4.2TF vs 6TF consoles? I mean the 8-9TF PS5 will have a 3TF divide and a much better CPU and maybe faster ram too (GDDR6)....So if you won't be able to tell the difference with such a subpar PS5 upgrade, I guess you also believe there's absolutely no difference between PRO and XBONEX right now? Afterall, It's only 1.8TF apart with the same assets, same jaguar cpu et al......
Halo 5 is not native 4k it's DR, State of decay 2 is not even out yet so how can you confirm that, did you pixel count your early copy?
And though Halo Wars 2 is 4k it's also missing effects, and you can add it to your list no problem, yet, it tears and falls to 20fps anytime there's heavy alpha on screen, perhaps it should be at a lower resolution, pubg the same, falls to some of the lowest framerates when there's heavy alpha on screen at 4k and we already know it's general performance.....I mean it's great to say 4k, but at least the games should run well at 4k to show the machine is capable of doing so...I mean Sea of thieves is 4k with probably the lowest FOV ever, playing this at 30fps will literally get people vomitting everywhere on top of motion sickness....Fortnite looks much better and runs at 60fps, which is a greater pull on the GPU.....So you have not been honest with me here, at least all the games I mentioned are 4k native all the time and corroborated....Also, KI drops frames, so maybe it should be DR, just like they did with PS3 when there was heavy alpha in SF4... and Super lucky drops frames constantly for such a game, that one even surprised me...So to some of the games, 4k yes, but it's looking like the hardware can't always push it with aplomb.....which says so much for negligible differences with XBONEX vs PS5, because I'm sure PS5 will have a hardtime running Super Lucky Tales at 4k locked 60fps
or even Skyrim remastered without reverting to DR at 30fps......
In any case, why are you guys in a PS5 rumor thread if all your'll are going to say is that XBONEX is going to muddy the waters and make PS5 games look negligible.....From the looks of it you guys already have a beast of a console.....
Yes, there's the elder scrolls online......If you want the SP RPG, there's Skyrim remastered too....