Ascend
Member
Only when it is done for pushing an agenda, portraying being LGBT as something that makes a character great. As previously stated in this thread, I thought Philadelphia was a good movie. So I'm not against gays being in media. But they must have a purpose to improve the media itself, rather than catering to a loud minority.Stating it as an inescapable escalation is very much equating it. Don’t try to be obtuse.
But I have to give it to you, you’re the first of all those dudes here stating they „don’t care at all“ being honest enough to openly state you oppose any Display of homosexuality in media.
Which,by the way, makes your first post in this thread rather disingenuous. As was expected.
And no I'm not equating pedophilia to being gay. If people want to be in a gay relationship, that's generally consensual and through free will. Pedophilia involves a child which is not yet capable of understanding the situation and is therefore a sexual victim. I do see and think that gayness being forced onto people through media has some parallels with pedophiles forcing their desires on children. The parallel is in the imposing & forcing. In Overwatch this isn't really the case apparently, since it's a separate backstory outside of the game itself. But this thread does give a certain impression...
Maybe my first post seems disingenuous, but it really wasn't. I asked why it's important to portray who is LGBT and who isn't... In other words, why are we focusing on sexuality yet again? If NONE of the characters had their sexuality mentioned, would that be a problem? Why must we specifically mention who is LGBT? Why are we pandering again?