• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Will You Be Buying Google Stadia?

Will you buy Google Stadia?

  • Yes, I'm getting the Founder's Edition for $129.

    Votes: 22 4.3%
  • I might pick up a cheap game when Stadia Base comes out.

    Votes: 56 10.8%
  • No, I'm not interested.

    Votes: 439 84.9%

  • Total voters
    517

Kadayi

Banned
Right... I get it now- big Google sponsorship at NeoGaf today.

giphy.gif
 

Northeastmonk

Gold Member
No. As much as I support digital gaming and streaming, I cannot justify purchasing anything like this. I would have to A. receive it as a gift or B. Be put in a position where I can no longer play games from a device I already own.
 

Orenji Neko

Member
Well, to be honest, this isn't something I'll ever be interested in. That said, I'm rather fascinated at the observational aspect of it; watching how it does, if there are any effects on the industry, stuff like that. I think it's a part of the industry's history that while I won't be partaking in, it's an element to observe.

Even if it doesn't have a lot of users, I would hope that even if somewhat niche, it stays running as something that operates for a specific type of customer that doesn't need or want the consoles or PC. I think it would be most unfortunate indeed if people put money up for this only to get burned later, because as others have mentioned, they do have a track record of abandoning things when it doesn't work out the way they want. (Google)

But yeah, it's just the overall story of this thing, how it ends up doing, and where things go from here that I'm interested in; not in the actual use or participation of the service because for me, if streaming became the thing the industry goes to, that's when I hang it up on what comes next and just resign myself to enjoying the older games I actually possess on hand. There's more than enough of them to last me the rest of my days and keep me happy.
 
Last edited:

LOLCats

Banned
Issues it creates:

Input lag
Image artifacts
Shits on ownership
Shits on game preservation
Internet dependent


Issues it fixes:

Saving money from having your own hardware?
More convenient


Yeah i think it creates much worse problems than it solves.

Pass.
You forgot download caps gonna get blown out
ISPs will love selling you their ”unlimited” packages at 50-75$ more a month.
 
Last edited:

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Time to find out who the other 4 that preordered are. You guys are going to get to know each other well. :messenger_winking_tongue:
hahah at least i am intrested in the tech .
for real " wasting"129 euro is not really something i would get angry about,
fuck looking at neogaf and the plastic shit people spend 100+ on makes me kinda laugh ;)

z17RE8g.jpg


Yay i am a "founder" whatever that means.
 
Last edited:

johntown

Banned
As of right now nope. If it is still around in a few years and proves it has longevity then I might consider it.
 

Shy Fingers

Banned
Switch has taught me I like my things on the go for my lifestyle. Always online ain't going to cut it currently, especially on wifi
 

GamesAreFun

Banned
No, and after their presentation I'm going to try PS Now instead. It seems a much better value subscription, and you can even download the games.
 

DanielsM

Banned
Issues it fixes:

Saving money from having your own hardware?
More convenient

I would probably argue that it doesn't fix those things and actually has more cons than you put down.

- Hardware is not eliminated, your requirements for hardware doesn't go down... it actually goes up
- the convenient factor is, neither a pro or con as a person can do that today and for basically years now with their own equipment

Additional cons:
- more internet bandwidth required... huge amounts on both ends
- increased electricity usage on both ends as it requires more hardware


Virtualized servers and desktops can make sense in the business world, not so much in the consumer realm, generally speaking.
 
Last edited:

HoldTheAir

Member
I feel like it will end up going the way of Google Allo and Google+. Why get it when you can play the best games on Xbox and Playstation?
 

DanielsM

Banned
I don't know who this thing is for, but definitely not me

Its for an executive that goes from job to job, flip flopping his theories on where gaming is going during his interview to land his next job. 🕘 (clock is ticking)

(Nintendo's double secret double agent)

Phil-Harrison-Double-Agent.png
 
Last edited:
Well, you basically buy games and rent a device to play on it. Might be interesting case if you have console and then want to play anywhere. But there will be XCloud....
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
what i am hoping for that stadia will be like a service you buy games you own for dirt cheap so you just have it on the cloud
 

nkarafo

Member
- Hardware is not eliminated, your requirements for hardware doesn't go down... it actually goes up
I meant in the sense that you don't have to buy an expensive video card yourself (or any expensive hardware part based on it's performance) as those parts will be on the cloud.
 

DanielsM

Banned
I meant in the sense that you don't have to buy an expensive video card yourself (or any expensive hardware part based on it's performance) as those parts will be on the cloud.

We're on the same page. (y)

My point is, all of this will generally be more expensive in the long-run than native playing, and more hardware will be needed than what people use today, just the location changes. People were expecting free shit and its not going to happen, we're on the same page though.

To be honest, I really don't see a pro to this, generally speaking.... and lots of cons.
 
Last edited:

CyberPanda

Banned
They should have allowed you to keep the games, and allow streaming. I think more people would have voted yes then.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Right... I get it now- big Google sponsorship at NeoGaf today. Well, as they say money is just money once it leaves the grip of an evil man- let's hope Google's ill gotten gains do some good here.

Don't be a derp.

 

93xfan

Banned
I’ve got good internet, so....

No.

Did I mention I have good internet because I don’t like latency
 

Clarissa

Banned
I'm unable to vote but my answer is no.

The games I play are mostly competitive multiplayer games like fighters and fps. No every frame counts.
 

93xfan

Banned
My internet is good enough to run it, but no. It's a pass for me. Now unless they have some good exclusives and the input lag doesn't seem to be an issue then maybe

Input late is always an issue. When would we ever want to go back to less responsiveness.

I’ll play games on my next gen console.
 

stickkidsam

Gold Member
In a word, nah.

In a few words, fuck no I wouldn't touch that glorified subscription service with a 40 ft Ethernet cable.
 

DjMystix

Member
I am always on the lookout to improve gaming on the go (meaning travelling, not commuting) so I had interest in it. I loved the idea of a wifi controller that I can take with me anywhere and can play my games anywhere I can find a screen. So all signs were good and I was willing to do a $10 a month subscription too. But they lost me at buying games on this platform, hell no to that. There is absolutely zero reason for me to add another platform to the mix that is already a lot to manage between PS4, XB1 and Switch.

If they want to succeed, they need to have an xbox game pass / PSNOW like subscription with 100s of games to play. Otherwise, this is dead on arrival (IMO). Especially when xCloud is right around the corner and already proven to be a far better deal with just the game pass alone (technology aside).
 
Last edited:

Snake29

RSI Employee of the Year
Everyone wants to try it, but does anyone want to stick with this option...i don't know. Can't see how this is going to replace my console or pc.
 
Last edited:

spawn

Member
The neogaf community is strongly giving a no on this, but my worry is that this Christmas parents will look at the price for $129 and think that is an awesome deal for their kids without really knowing how it works and the internet requirements needed for it
 

Clarissa

Banned
Has anyone checked the poll at Resetera?

How is it like over there? They have a similar thread but results of the poll can only be seen after voting.
 

kunonabi

Member
No interest in streaming games and I'm certainly not paying for a subscription and full game prices to do it even if I did.
 

Miyazaki’s Slave

Gold Member
Yup, and I think streaming content (games) is the future for the industry. I want this to be an option on new hardware as well (it runs in a web browser and I already have google apps on other hardware) and google isn’t going to be the only player in the space.

I am sure I will have as many game streaming subs as I have for music and video content.
 

juliotendo

Member
Stadia hype will disappear shortly after launch. I don’t see too many people using that service in the long run, and knowing Google it will probably quietly be shut down after a year or two. Google messed up by not providing some sort of physical box to make it an easier sell and smoother to transition people into.

Stadia by Fall 2020 is no longer part of any conversation once next generation XBOX and PlayStation are out in the wild.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom