AnotherOne
Member
Yes sir, lg ea9800 I think it was like 10k.2013? I don't recall OLEDs being available then. must have been expensive.
Yes sir, lg ea9800 I think it was like 10k.2013? I don't recall OLEDs being available then. must have been expensive.
Real-Life OLED Burn-In Test On 6 TVs
There are concerns about OLED long-term performance due to the possibility of burn-in. We bought 6 LG OLED C7s to play real, non-altered content. It should give you a better idea of what to expect depending on what you watch on your TV.www.rtings.com
Real-Life OLED Burn-In Test On 6 TVs
There are concerns about OLED long-term performance due to the possibility of burn-in. We bought 6 LG OLED C7s to play real, non-altered content. It should give you a better idea of what to expect depending on what you watch on your TV.www.rtings.com
Before anyone gets bothered by this, please for the love of god make sure you read the article and look at the other pictures instead of this one. These are extreme cases where the same image remains static for 20 hours. Nothing remotely close to mimicking real world use. Nobody should spend the money to get an OLED if they're going to watch CNN (or anything with static logos) all day.
OLED is LED also.
And what's with this OLED or nothing attitude? Only a sith deals in absolutes.
Don't know what you're smoking or just being hyperbolic but I found the QLED I'm using to be great for gaming and movie watching after going through the picture settings.
It's very good but the C9 is superior. Much less input lag in game mode is a big deal.
That's one glowing review! Shame about burn in.
MicroLED can't come soon enough.
Yeah, NO!No. It's not an issue except in extreme cases of carelessness. If it was OLED an issue would be long dead, but it continues to gain more and more marketshare. Does that mean it can't happen? No, but you almost have to try to make it happen.
I want a 50 inch oled. Don't like gaming on a ginormous tv, and space is limited. Where are the 50-43 inch oleds? I thought they would be out by now for sure.
nobody is arguing that the potential for burn in doesn't exist. But it is rare and when it does happen it is most likely is the result of carelessness. For your one horror story there are 100s of others with no issues. If you're an individual who is gonna use a TV to play one game with static hub elements and/or watch one TV station then an OLED is probably not for you. But if you're someone who uses the TV for gaming, movies, Netflix, sports, then burn in is extremely unlikely. I've had an OLED for over a year and the only real knock I have on it is the noticeable stutter in 24fps film content. I've put in multiple 40+ hours games with static hub elements and have not noticed any image retention let alone burn in. I am actually shocked at how resilient it has been. I put in some LONG Dark Souls 1 and 3 sessions and figured I would have seen something. Maybe I have the best of the best in the panel lottery.Yeah, NO!
I used to be an OLED evangelist myself three years ago when I bought the B6. I used all the correct settings with pixel refresh and no exaggerated settings. Six months later I had a morning sun from a news program that I watched about an hour a day permanently shadowed in.
LG replaced it of course with a C7 and I was very pleased. Worked great for almost two years as well but last month I had a shadow appear in the middle only visibel when red, yellow, purple tones appeared. LG once again did the right thing and gave me a new panel.
Now you might say I was unlucky and should blame myself for my "carelessness" but how come LG went along with these replacements and repairs if this was all my fault.
Personally I'm considering a move back to LED because I think more of these reports will come now that OLED is going mainstream which may hurt the resale value of my just repaired OLED. Not to mention if I get another problem with my current panel I'll be out of warranty and good luck reselling it then. I spent around $1700 on the TV three years ago and I think that's a lot of money for a TV to go wrong so soon twice.
Short version: Stop being a shill for LG blaming consumers for "carelessness" when the technology obviously has margins of error within it like every other.
Xbox One S/X is not mainstream? 0oVrr may be useful in the future, but currently it's as useful as hdmi 4.0 - there are no mainstream consoles that currently use it.
The Xbox One X supports it at framerates between 40-60 fps, but since so few games have an unlocked multiplier it is virtually not being used.Xbox One S/X is not mainstream? 0o
You are right. https://www.whathifi.com/us/news/you-will-soon-be-able-to-buy-a-48-inch-oled-tvI heard they are working on 40” to 50” inch OLEDs. I know I heard about the 40”, but I think they are creating a 50” or something a little under it as well. I think they will be out possibly next year?
This article was published in march and so far there has been no other info.You are right. https://www.whathifi.com/us/news/you-will-soon-be-able-to-buy-a-48-inch-oled-tv
And the smaller OLED Tvs will also have HDMI 2.1 as well i bet. I want a 40 to 48 inch Sony or LG oled. I will buy it as soon as it releases.
To my understand it's games with a 60 fps target that don't 100% hit that target that will have a benefit and there's quite a lot of 60 fps games on Xbox One so it's far from virtually none? 0oThe Xbox One X supports it at framerates between 40-60 fps, but since so few games have an unlocked multiplier it is virtually not being used.
Most of them are at a locked 60 fps and rarely dip below that such that VRR would be noticeably beneficial.To my understand it's games with a 60 fps target that don't 100% hit that target that will have a benefit and there's quite a lot of 60 fps games on Xbox One so it's far from virtually none? 0o