kraspkibble
Permabanned.
if you are playing on console then of course you will be disappointed if you are comparing it to PC.
the game looks like shit on pc too no offense but the game looks just empty.bottom pict are prob from GTX 2080 TI
Xbox One X cant fight that bruh
Wait for Xbox Pocahontas
Did you all miss my post on page 2 with a screenshot taken from the Xbox one X version?
OP is full of shit, it’s nothing like that ingame. Possibly he encountered a bug or streaming/loading issue, but the games nothing like that.
This is what the game looks like on my own Xbox one X (screenshot taken on the system by me today, sadly compressed but gets the point over)
OPs Xbox One X pic
OPs PC Pic
Look at the ground texture, the AO/shadow lass etc. The pics the OP posted are nothing like what it looks like.
Its weird, i think the game looks beautiful maxed out on PC. The npc faces are a bit too Fallout, but everything else looks great to me.the game looks like shit on pc too no offense but the game looks just empty.
i like the actual game itself but fuck man that world looks plain af
We didn't miss your post. You're blind, your pic is even worse than OP's.
Xbros... We lost this one...
I think the bottom one has HDR enabled and the screenshot wasn't converted to the right color space which is why it looks dull.
Forgive me if I don’t listen to a Sony soy boy. Go wank off over the Last Of Us trailer, eh?
In my shot, other than compression, shading and lighting matches correctly. Not as good as ultra pc setting but you would have to be an idiot to think that would happen anyway.
I’ve already explained possible foliage reasons on page 2, and the technical details behind it.
What are YOU doing, other than getting a semi at negative Xbox news?
Bit sad, really.
Tell me about it. As a console gamer with a 1080p TV set (don't MOST people still rock this native res?) it frustrates me that the Pro and the X both push for 4k ahead of a solid, stable 60fps. Speaking honestly, it's one of the biggest attractions of Stadia.
As far as I can see you’re not contributing anything to this thread so why are you here?
And as for “4k textures”, the expression is used for many different things. It doesn’t just equal “textures in 4k resolution” because even the 360 supported 2048x2048 mips. It just means higher res textures, in some form. And from what I can see, yes, they are there, but the source media is full of noise and not very good anyway, so you won’t get much of a boost from that.
But the original screenshots DO show big differences in other ways. Shadow map LODs seem to have different fade distances and penumbra settings, AO is scaled back, foliage has already been discussed in my previous post, and for some reason, shadows are all in really odd positions, likely due to time of day randomness.
You’re adding nothing to this thread, so, you know, piss off.
Next time read the op before you call someone full of shit. Even the Pro version looks better. Now piss off since you're not really helping.
nah it looks off.Its weird, i think the game looks beautiful maxed out on PC. The npc faces are a bit too Fallout, but everything else looks great to me.
1080p/60fps over 4k/30fps any day of the week
Yikes!It does not support hdr.
1440p minimum is a nice compromise as 1080p on a 50 inch plus tv is looking a bit jaggy/blurry these days when close.Same for me. It’s downright painful now to play modern games in 30 frames and gladly take advantage of 60FPS modes when offered.
We had more 60FPS games two generations ago, which is just sad. I could almost forgive it in the first HD generation, but not anymore.
if you are playing on console then of course you will be disappointed if you are comparing it to PC.
Same for me. It’s downright painful now to play modern games in 30 frames and gladly take advantage of 60FPS modes when offered.
We had more 60FPS games two generations ago, which is just sad. I could almost forgive it in the first HD generation, but not anymore.
Same for me. It’s downright painful now to play modern games in 30 frames and gladly take advantage of 60FPS modes when offered.
We had more 60FPS games two generations ago, which is just sad. I could almost forgive it in the first HD generation, but not anymore.
I think what people are saying is why go for 4k if you have to have sizeable downgrades to reach 4k. Why not go 1800p or 1620p with no downgrades.was anybody actually thinking the X was gonna keep up with PC? is there any Pro comparison with Pc?
surely nobody was thinking that any of them could keep up. am sure they both look amazing
I think what people are saying is why go for 4k if you have to have sizeable downgrades to reach 4k. Why not go 1800p or 1620p with no downgrades.
Its a fair point to be honest.
I mean i'm playing at 1080p/60 on PC and the AA is so clean, sharp and jaggie free, that i dont know why they targeted 4k anyway.
Honestly, your shot looks way worse other than the crushed blacks in the OPs image.Did you all miss my post on page 2 with a screenshot taken from the Xbox one X version?
OP is full of shit, it’s nothing like that ingame. Possibly he encountered a bug or streaming/loading issue, but the games nothing like that.
This is what the game looks like on my own Xbox one X (screenshot taken on the system by me today, sadly compressed but gets the point over)
OPs Xbox One X pic
OPs PC Pic
Look at the ground texture, the AO/shadow lass etc. The pics the OP posted are nothing like what it looks like.
And as for “4k textures”, the expression is used for many different things. It doesn’t just equal “textures in 4k resolution” because even the 360 supported 2048x2048 mips.
No he's right, your picture looks just as bad as mine does but at a different time of day. All the same equally bad though.Forgive me if I don’t listen to a Sony soy boy. Go wank off over the Last Of Us trailer, eh?
In my shot, other than compression, shading and lighting matches correctly. Not as good as ultra pc setting but you would have to be an idiot to think that would happen anyway.
I’ve already explained possible foliage reasons on page 2, and the technical details behind it.
What are YOU doing, other than getting a semi at negative Xbox news?
Bit sad, really.
Did you all miss my post on page 2 with a screenshot taken from the Xbox one X version?
OP is full of shit, it’s nothing like that ingame. Possibly he encountered a bug or streaming/loading issue, but the games nothing like that.
This is what the game looks like on my own Xbox one X (screenshot taken on the system by me today, sadly compressed but gets the point over)
OPs Xbox One X pic
OPs PC Pic
Look at the ground texture, the AO/shadow lass etc. The pics the OP posted are nothing like what it looks like.
Damn breh, X1X got done did dirty. Sry bro.No he's right, your picture looks just as bad as mine does but at a different time of day. All the same equally bad though.
It does, I'm on Obsidian's forum as well trying to get it addressed.Lel, sounds like the PS4 version has the grass.
master race confirmed.....
You may need one, also.
There no reason for XBX to look so downgraded at 30fps compared to PC.
I'm on a 9700k/gtx 1080. Whole pc cost me 950. You dont need a beast rig for this game. PC is always going to be the best if you can do the upfront costs. This shouldn't be a mystery to anyone. Why the xbox one x port went for max resolution instead of level of detail is crazy though.I’m running The Outer Worlds maxed out on my RTX 2080 Ti/9900k. My pc cost me $4500 CAD. There’s your answer.