• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

splattered

Member
For those talking about Superbowl ads, It wont happen. This is election year on US, it is said that Bloomberg will pay as much as 10M for a spot. It has become prohibitive for others.

Well what if Sony and Bloomberg go in on a cross-supported ad!? 5 Million each! Bloomberg officially endorses the PS5 in his bid for presidential race automatically winning over all the millennials and saving a cool 5 mil in the process.
 
Last edited:


Sr4xhu5.jpg


Cool design concept.
lord-buckethead-last-week-tonight-john-oliver-video-621768.jpg
 

DaGwaphics

Member
Can you explain how 9 and 12 rdna aren't that much different than 1.3 and 1.8 GCN gap. It made a huge difference on the current gen. I literally can look at an OG Xbox1 dashboard on a good tv and see that it looked different looking from the dashboard graphics than the OG PS4. I owned 360 but PS4 looked a world different to my eye on an expensive tv.

It's about percentages. Traditionally, a part with 50% more performance (the OG Xbone was at 1.2 initially with .1 TF reserved for Kinnect) will show noticeable differences. A Part that is 33% different not as much.

With that said these consoles could both be 12 or 13, or 9, or 10. LOL
 

Gavin Stevens

Formerly 'o'dium'
No way they release a console design with “PSV” on it 😂 they want to get far away from that train wreck lol.

Also, first thing I thought of when I saw that pic was the console looks like a helmet from dark souls haha.
 

JLB

Banned
Well what if Sony and Bloomberg go in on a cross-supported ad!? 5 Million each! Bloomberg officially endorses the PS5 in his bid for presidential race automatically winning over all the millennials and saving a cool 5 mil in the process.

I mean... a Bloomberg endorsement doesnt look particularly interesting. In any case it would be fun if that happens. Bloombergs ad is about antigun, imagine endorse PS5 showing a new KillZone right next to it. Rock and roll!
 

Gavin Stevens

Formerly 'o'dium'
Im pretty confident the PS5 is 9.2tflop with faster ssd. It makes sense of the dev talking about how one console will be weaker but better balanced. It also makes sense because Sony dominated this gen so much that they dont need to win the power game to sell PS5s but MS does need to win it if they hope to get back in the race. Sony is more likely to sell at $399 and not take a loss whereas MS would be more willing to take a loss.

*insert old post about SSD here*

No chance on that one, the SSD won’t be utilised at all other than a few choice first party games.

Anyway, you’re probably right about the other part, PS5 could be a damn toaster with a Sony badge and it will sell out.
 

Ellery

Member
Can you explain how 9 and 12 rdna aren't that much different than 1.3 and 1.8 GCN gap. It made a huge difference on the current gen. I literally can look at an OG Xbox1 dashboard on a good tv and see that it looked different looking from the dashboard graphics than the OG PS4. I owned 360 but PS4 looked a world different to my eye on an expensive tv.

because in % it is a bigger difference and at some point it kind of acts like diminishing returns. The difference between 9 and 12 TF would actually be much smaller than people think. Third party titles would have different resolutions. Like the Xbox One X and PS4 Pro and the difference between the PS4 Pro and the Xbox One X is bigger than the % difference between 9 and 12 TF.

The biggest problem for Microsoft is that they can't really afford to have a worse console than Sony, but the other way around it would be not a big deal. Sony has much more brand loyalty and the exclusive games are in a different realm. I bet even if the Xbox Series X came in at 14TF and the PS5 at 8TF then the PS5 would still outsell the Xbox Series X.
 
It's nothing more than your belief and interpretation. It's your right to ignore holes in this leak and obvious stretch in interpretation to get to conclusion that you like.
But you should agree that it's only you subjective opinion, other people have right to other interpretations of the same facts (their subjective opinions), and all of this just forum rumbling that has nothing with scientific approach.

There are some simple question that have no answers, and having no answers means that conclusion are just "loosy hypothesis" nased on subjective bias and nothing else.
1. It's not proven that the leak is real and actual - not tailored or doctored. We get some vague confirmation that "data is real", but it can mean anything. For example - I get data from 2018 year, change all dates 1 year forward, and post it as leak. Basically all data in it is "real", but all further conclusions have a high chance of being faulty (doctored results). Or Sony decides to create a misleading leak to fool everyone and lower expectation. They ask AMD to do some tests of old stuff, put some garbage into folders and pretend that it is spontaneus leak by some intern. Post it on the internet and watch the forums burn (controlled tailored leak).
There is a reason why all scientific theories cannot be based on just one source and must be checked against independent source.
2. Even if this data is completelly true and reflect current state of chips, there are a lot of other interpretations - BC testing, dual GPU, old revision random testing etc. And they are as good as pushing agenda of "36 CU is a final state" - because it's impossible to hard prove that they are faulty conclusions (not enough data) and most everyone can do is to rely on "I think my explanation is more reliable". And this is not science - science theory is objective, replicable and doesn't allow different interpretations in the same borders of framework.

And personally for me this information have less value than insiders info. Because insiders have educated opinion based on information with presumably with completeness. And everyone who tries to push this leak do a guess with very weak foundation of incomplete information with absence of established framework what this information is about, that is usually a basis to have heavily influenced by bias conclusion.

If you're this willing to put the benchmark leaks under such scrutiny, why aren't you willing to do the same with insider rumors? If you're selectively dismissing certain information in favor of other information, then you should just admit it is being done out of a bias.

I haven't ignored the more questionable parts of the Github leak and benchmark tests; well aware that 100% context isn't present. That's why I say they are probable: basing that off of how stuff just like this played out last gen, and the gen before that. Precedent, history repeating itself, patterns etc. And I haven't 100% dismissed insiders; quite the opposite, actually. With the credible ones, when they post stuff I question, I either ask them for elaboration directly, or speculate fairly how they could be arriving to/hearing those rumors.

From looking at your post, you already assume Sony intentionally had those benchmarks leak out...why would they also mix in Xbox-related tests? Why would they ask AMD to do that? Why would Microsoft agree to that? That's the kind of stuff that could result in court cases, these companies are not petty or nearly at each other's throats enough to jeopardize their business relationships that way.

We have had other sources besides that one Github leak: further GPU benchmarks with Ariel and Oberon (and other chips like Arden, Sparkman etc.) consistently showing similar testing data. Those are AMD's own repositories of benchmark testing data...seems like a pretty good source to me. Unless you're implying people like Komachi have an agenda to smear a company like Sony...all the same, you could speculate some insiders have an agenda to smear Microsoft. Anything's possible in that sense, but I'm going to venture that Komachi, Rogane etc. are not intending to do that, and I don't think most of the insiders are trying to do something like that, either (except perhaps Tommy).

I've speculated on dual-GPU possibility, but I've also questioned why something like, say, dual Oberons, would "only" produce a high-end of 12-13TF knowing that would be both chips clocked well below the sweetspot. So what's left? Dual-GPU Oberon + Ariel (assuming Ariel isn't an earlier version of Oberon)? Same issue. Oberon + Gonzalo? Possibly. But that's as far as dual-GPU speculation can go with what has been uncovered right now.

What's more possible is that there's probably a cluster of CUs on Oberon that were deactivated. That's why I quoted that APU graphic in one of my other posts: it's more likely than a dual-GPU approach given what we know right now. The only thing that graphic doesn't seem to entertain is possibility that a similar disabling of CUs might've been done with the Arden chip. In any case, it's a likely possibility.

Again I'll just say: back in 2012/2013 when benchmarks for PS4 and XBO were coming out, and (a bit later) some of the system features leaks were coming out, did we see similar dismissal of benchmarks and leaks from people (particularly Xbox fans who couldn't believe what they were seeing)? You bet we did. Yet we see how those shook out in the end. I've never once claimed the Github and benchmark datamined leaks are 100% what the next-gen systems will have, but they're somewhat pretty indicative of what is in store for them, absolutely. And we've already considered wiggle room scenarios in terms of those benchmarks that can give credence to some of the more reasonable insider claims, too.

It's not an either/or binary thing, there's room for both to be accurate on some things. But for reasons I've already mentioned plenty of times, I would weigh the benchmarks more on the scale than insider rumors. By how much, I'm still in flux with. But it is what it is.

For me the best concept is still this

First time I've seen this one; looks pretty damn good. Wouldn't mind this being the retail design whatsoever (y)
 
Last edited:

MonkeyPunch

Neo Member
Another dumb poem based off Github.
I'm just happy having speshal ed trying to push it off as fake news back then. Oh well, let's give him time to sell Xbox Era merchandise. Wathcing them trying to defend themselves was hilarious though.

I read stuff here now and then, and I'm keeping to my promise to only leak out what happened there if theyre proven wrong.

Until then I will just lurk until the time comes.
 

demigod

Member
From BG on other site.

"Before I leave, if I remember correctly, tomorrow there is a private event in the Sony Hall. It is public information. Maybe they announce home Remedies against anxiety."
 

01011001

Banned
My favorite part about all these rumors is that Sony will ship an 8 teraflop 499 console against Microsofts 12+ 499 teraflop console all the while Lockheart will be a 299 priced 7 teraflop console.

there are 2 likely scenarios,
either scenario A: both systems will be $399 and are both in the 8 to 9 TF range (with the only difference being clock speed and maybe some tinkering with the hardware on each, maybe they will actually push these GPUs to their limits and go above 2GHz pushing for 10TF)
this is the scenario we should expect in order to not get disappointed when they finally reveal the systems. this is the conservative approach and 9 times out of 10 companies will go the conservative route.

or scenario B: Sony will go $399 in the 9 TF range and Microsoft will take a risk and release a 12TF $599 system (a 12TF AMD GPU even next year will most likely be very expensive especially if it turns out to be RNDA2, we are talking numbers here that not a single consumer RDNA Graphics Card has at the moment, meaning this is above AMD's own current high end GPUs) with a possible lower end version at either also $399 or slightly below that. which actually could release at a later date even.
this scenario is possible but it would be a huge gamble and since the Xbox One didn't sell super bad Microsoft might not be willing to take a risk this big for maybe little to no gains.

whatever will come true I bet Sony's system has more custom designs in it than Microsoft's system, just going by past systems. and I can't see Sony going above $399 because their investors would commit sudoku on them if they did that again... Microsoft on the other hand has to do something so they could take a risk, like a last push to gain back marketshare.
 
Last edited:
I hate to do this but, she knows about the ads marketing companies are putting out there. She says she hasn't heard about Sony. Which means they are not doing one or just aren't putting out there that they are doing one. I'm going to jump to conclusions here and say if they are doing one, they don't want people to know yet. Very unlike their previous years.

Makes sense to be quiet until the big BOOM.

However I'm curious when they are finally announcing an event for it... If there is one.
 

McHuj

Member
Private event in the Sony Hall is at 9pm. Friday night at 9pm EST is not a good time to announce anything. No one is paying attention in the US and everyone in Euro will be a sleep or drunk.

They may have some sort of announcement tomorrow, I'm not going to discount that potential (like the rumored Remedy acquisition), but not at 9pm.
 

demigod

Member
Who's BG


On the edit opions above, the 3 dots > scroll down > choose media > choose a gifs site



This guy.


Private event in the Sony Hall is at 9pm. Friday night at 9pm EST is not a good time to announce anything. No one is paying attention in the US and everyone in Euro will be a sleep or drunk.

They may have some sort of announcement tomorrow, I'm not going to discount that potential (like the rumored Remedy acquisition), but not at 9pm.

Yeah 9PM EST is a bad time. Who knows, we'll see.
 

schaft0620

Member
Private event in the Sony Hall is at 9pm. Friday night at 9pm EST is not a good time to announce anything. No one is paying attention in the US and everyone in Euro will be a sleep or drunk.

They may have some sort of announcement tomorrow, I'm not going to discount that potential (like the rumored Remedy acquisition), but not at 9pm.

Many in press have said for weeks including just the other day, that they don't have invites yet. This is not how it works. These people don't just drop everything and get to NY in a weeks notice.

Edit: I see we are in agreement, quoted wrong post.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of GitHub. I think this post is the most sensible take

From Desetera



A eureka moment if I ever saw one.

Nobody is saying the data isn't real. It is and these test were done. Is it the final PS5 specifications? No.

Same for the Arden test. They aren't indicative of anything going into the retail console. They are just test.
This makes the most since to me out of anything I've read here - WOW🤯
 

demigod

Member
Just posting so my previous comment will just fucking go away.
I hate it that comments not posted are just saved to the reply window and just refuses to go away even when deleting all the text and closing the browser. I even deleted my entire browser history. It's so annoying.

Click the floppy disk and hit Delete Draft if you're on PC. I wish mobile had this.
 

Gamernyc78

Banned
Just posting so my previous comment will just fucking go away.
I hate it that comments not posted are just saved to the reply window and just refuses to go away even when deleting all the text and closing the browser. I even deleted my entire browser history. It's so annoying.

Fucking hate tht and it shouldn't be something so hard to correct.
 

darkinstinct

...lacks reading comprehension.
It's about percentages. Traditionally, a part with 50% more performance (the OG Xbone was at 1.2 initially with .1 TF reserved for Kinnect) will show noticeable differences. A Part that is 33% different not as much.

With that said these consoles could both be 12 or 13, or 9, or 10. LOL

How big were the differences between Pro and the 45 % more powerful One X? Any difference will be just down to resolution. XSX could target native 4K/60, PS5 upscaled 4K/60 (like Pro), XSS native 1080p/60.
 
It's nothing more than your belief and interpretation. It's your right to ignore holes in this leak and obvious stretch in interpretation to get to conclusion that you like.
But you should agree that it's only you subjective opinion, other people have right to other interpretations of the same facts (their subjective opinions), and all of this just forum rumbling that has nothing with scientific approach.

There are some simple question that have no answers, and having no answers means that conclusion are just "loosy hypothesis" nased on subjective bias and nothing else.
1. It's not proven that the leak is real and actual - not tailored or doctored. We get some vague confirmation that "data is real", but it can mean anything. For example - I get data from 2018 year, change all dates 1 year forward, and post it as leak. Basically all data in it is "real", but all further conclusions have a high chance of being faulty (doctored results). Or Sony decides to create a misleading leak to fool everyone and lower expectation. They ask AMD to do some tests of old stuff, put some garbage into folders and pretend that it is spontaneus leak by some intern. Post it on the internet and watch the forums burn (controlled tailored leak).
There is a reason why all scientific theories cannot be based on just one source and must be checked against independent source.
2. Even if this data is completelly true and reflect current state of chips, there are a lot of other interpretations - BC testing, dual GPU, old revision random testing etc. And they are as good as pushing agenda of "36 CU is a final state" - because it's impossible to hard prove that they are faulty conclusions (not enough data) and most everyone can do is to rely on "I think my explanation is more reliable". And this is not science - science theory is objective, replicable and doesn't allow different interpretations in the same borders of framework.

And personally for me this information have less value than insiders info. Because insiders have educated opinion based on information with presumably with completeness. And everyone who tries to push this leak do a guess with very weak foundation of incomplete information with absence of established framework what this information is about, that is usually a basis to have heavily influenced by bias conclusion.
I'm going with this theory officially now - it really makes since.....

"Yes, I very much expect this. Indeed, it even affects my thoughts about nextgen in general. The recent GitHub leak of testing notes were for what is surely PS5 APU hardware running in three modes: 18 CU at 800 MHz, 36 CU at 911 Mhz, and 36 CU at 2.0 GHz.The first mode corresponds exactly to PS4, and the second mode exactly to PS4 Pro, which is why we know this is PS5 hardware. The third mode is referred to as "native" or "full chip", so many have assumed this is the complete capability of PS5. They're thus disappointed because twice the Pro power--plus architectural improvements--is lower than often hoped or rumored.

However, my thinking is that the PS5 OS will feature a "Boost Mode" setting, like Pro does. This makes sense to me because of simple precedent, but also because PS5 will have backwards compatibility so there's even more of a use case. Without user-selectable Boost Mode, either PS5 would play PS4 games worse than PS4 Pro does, which would be pretty weird. Or it'd play them better automatically, which also doesn't fit Sony's recent MO. They seem institutionally concerned with ensuring good compatibility, which is why Boost Mode wasn't there to begin with, and why it's still optional with a warning message, even though almost no games react poorly.

On Pro, the boost is achieved by running 18 CUs at 911 MHz; that is, deactivating CUs to match the target platform, but leaving the clocks native. It doesn't seem likely to me that PS5 will completely ignore Pro-enhanced titles, though. They can have dynamic resolutions or unstable framerates too, so why wouldn't you boost them as well? To do that, you'd again deactivate CUs to match the target platform, but leave the clocks native. With the target being Pro, that could mean 36 CU at 2.0 GHz. Just like the Pro's 18 CUs at 911 MHz, this isn't the true physical setup of the GPU, but chosen for compatibility."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom