• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Opencritic: Super Mario Odyssey is The best video game of the generation

Azelover

Titanic was called the Ship of Dreams, and it was. It really was.
I dunno if I agree. I will say it's one of the most polished games I've ever played.

There aren't any rough edges. I guess if there's one word that could describe it is: smooth. Graphics, framerate, gameplay, it's all smooth.
 

Fbh

Member
It was fun though I wouldn't consider it the best game of the gen ....or even top 5.
Comparing games to each other based on review scores is silly anyway IMO. Games get reviewed for what they are so a 9.5 platformer isn't instantly a better game than, for example, a 8.5 RPG.
 
Last edited:

Alexios

Cores, shaders and BIOS oh my!
Really weird to see these, given all the I'm so edgy anti-Nintendo stance of the press (and gamurzzz) since like, idk, post-SNES, exasperated since the Wii era, yet even they can't deny the great quality of its flagship titles which results in things like this and metacritic's equivalent despite all the absurd "criticism" thrown at them.

It shows the bs non-arguments about how they release the same game(s) recycled for what they are, and how it's actually a testament to their capability for great design that they keep releasing masterpiece after masterpiece when other series get old and tired with nothing good or fresh to redeem them past a trilogy at best.
 
Last edited:
Really weird to see these, given all the I'm so edgy anti-Nintendo stance of the press (and gamurzzz) since like, idk, post-SNES, exasperated during the Wii days, yet even they can't deny the great quality of its flagship titles which results in things like things and metacritic's equivalent despite all the absurd "criticism" thrown at em.
Gameplay speaks the loudest after all.
 

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
I also prefer 3D World.

I also hate how "best game of the generation" and "best game of the decade" has become basically "best average review score at launch".

This list has "Mario Kart 8 DLC Pack 2" in 17th place. Ridiculous!
Yeah I wish publications took these lists as a chance to actually revisit these games and decide with a fresh set of eyes which one is the game of the generation. What games stood the test of time? Which ones got overshadowed by later releases? Which ones aged poorly?

i.e. did they replay all of their nominations recently and draw conclusions? When you claim "game of the generation", you'd think that it would be done with some context outside of the original launch window. But hey, that's just like my opinion man. Journos gonna journo.

Agreed w Mario Kart 8, personally. Would be in the top 10 for me. Nintendo bandies the phrase "evergreen title" but MK8D certainly transcends the marketing and fulfills that lofty role.

3D world is certainly better in pure platforming gameplay. Still confused why Nintendo didn't release a deluxe version for Switch yet.
It's probably on the way, Nintendo is just waiting for a slow slot (like Summer or early Autumn) to toss it out.
 
Last edited:

PocoJoe

Banned
Nintendo has 3 games with 97 metascore in the last decade. Sony has 0.

Typical nintendo bullshit ( scores )

Scores arent really comparable for nintendo vs others, as nintendo games tend to get much more slack. Bad mechanics,music, graphics, performance or controls? Still 5/5. While similar problems on other systems would drop points.

IMO you have to take 5-15 points away from typical nintendo game (if 100 is max) to get fair and realistic score.

Mario odyssey is far from the best game of the gen, fucking ridiculous to even claim it. To me it were one of the worst and boring games I have played this gen, also few of my friends didnt like it for more than 3/5 max.

Nintendo games are reviewed by fanboys(people that like nintendo type of games most) that cant see any flaws, or by people that fear the reaction if they would rate a game less than "perfect"

Just look about ps5/xbox game that have gotten almost perfect reviews, there are still reviews with low scores because some reviewers didnt like it (like death stranding)

But mario/zelda gets "perfect" scores from almost all reviewers and it just cant be realistic without some kind of biased reviewers etc.

Mario odyssey = repetitive boring "collect x things" on every level, if that is best gaming mechanics of the gen, people are retarded and simple.

I know there are different tastes, but it is ridiculous to claim that simple, shallow (dude jumps and collects coins) game with almost zero of a story would be THE game of the gen.

Nintendo just pushes out copy&paste marios&gang gen after gen, with few new gimmicks.


TLDR: points mean shit and nintendo games are always over rated and their flaws arent seen.
 
Last edited:

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
Nintendo has 3 games with 97 metascore in the last decade. Sony has 0.

If you're gonna play that game, Sony has 11 games that score 90+ from the past decade, 14 if you count baseball and a remake.

Nintendo has 6 (genuinely forgot Wii was still going in early 2010s) 9 and that's including 2 near-identical Smash games, 10 if you include WWHD.

See how dumb and arbitrary your point is now? Why does it matter that a game is 97 rather than 94?
 
Last edited:

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Quite possibly the greatest Nintendo game of the modern-era a masterpiece

It’s hard to put into words a good way of expressing how I feel after playing The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. This is the latest game in The Legend of Zelda gaming series by Nintendo, and one I have personally been looking forward to for a long time.

Originally musings of a new Zelda game coming for Nintendo’s previous home console, the Wii U, go all the way back to January 2013 when Mr Aonuma, series producer revealed the philosophy that would be the foundation for this new title.

Mr Aonuma and team had decided early on in the development of this title, to focus on making sure this game would be stray from the usual formula that most Zelda games, since Ocarina of Time, have followed. The mission statement for the new Zelda, was to “rethink the conventions of Zelda”. This concepts purpose was to look at the series as a whole to find out what the essence of Zelda is, and to discover what changes are required to be made to prevent the series from becoming stale or past it’s prime.

Unfortunately, one of the areas of criticism concerning the more recent 3D titles, have critiqued Zelda for resting on it’s laurels and being afraid of shaking up the formula, preferring to remain comfortable with the formula developed during Link’s first outing on Nintendo 64. After 5 3D mainline Zelda games, there has been a concern if Nintendo is no longer able to produce a title quite on the scale of their very best, and if this is something now beyond their reach.

Skyward Sword was originally developed with a similar train of thought, in re-thinking the conventions of Zelda. That particular game asked the player to revisit a dungeon they had already completed and encouraged players to interact with towns people to build rapport and be rewarded, much like in Majora’s Mask. With it’s new impressionist artstyle, and upgrading system similar to games such as Monster Hunter, Skyward Sword attempted to distance itself from being seen as an Ocarina of Time clone. Something which many players today still feel Twilight Princess represents.

It is fair to say the 3D Zelda games carry a legacy all of their own, and while Majora’s Mask didn’t receive such a welcoming reception and adoration upon release as it now enjoys, I think we can all agree these games have been good to excellent titles. Another incredible title, The Wind Waker, unfortunately suffered from many issues that later games would attempt to rectify, such as removing the hindrance many found sailing to be, providing more land for Link to explore, a preferable mode of transport, and larger, more fulfilling dungeons. The game’s biggest misstep, in my opinion, was a smattering feeling that the game was perhaps a bit rushed, and this is very evident in the second half of the game.

But what does the history of the 3D Zelda series have to do with Breath of the Wild? Isn’t this the game this review should be focusing on? Well, yes, actually the history of the Zelda franchise is important. Nintendo, specifically Mr Aonuma, was responsible for working on each of the titles I have mentioned in this review. Additionally, he has also been responsible for the various remakes and remasters of each 3D Zelda game (minus any revision of Skyward Sword, which as of typing this, does not yet exist). Because Mr Aonuma has had the valuable experience of re-visiting these titles, and making alterations to each of them along the way for various quality of life improvements, he has been able to re-discover these games in new ways. Not only does he have the experience of long ago creating these gems, but he has now dissected each, and has been able to look at them objectively and reject what is no longer considered acceptable, and provide the players with definitive versions. This isn’t to say those games are perfect, however the breadth of information he has obtained during this process, has enabled him to approach Breath of the Wild in a unique way.

In January 2013, Eiji Aonuma defined re-thinking Zelda’s conventions as, “complete the dungeons in a certain order” and “play by yourself”. The former became the central theme to the eventual game we would receive. That is to say, the very concept of player freedom itself, which has not been present in the series in any substantial way, since the original Legend of Zelda on NES. But this was merely an idea where they wanted to take the new Zelda at this stage, it wouldn’t be until the following year when we would find out what this concept had evolved into.

In June 2014, Nintendo fans and the press were finally shown a visual for what the new Legend of Zelda game for Wii U could be. However, to preface this, Eiji Aonuma introduced the unveiling by first referencing the original 1986 title. It was clear at this stage, that “completing dungeons in a certain order” had evolved into something spanning the very core of the title itself. Instead of limiting the player to make a decision of which dungeon they wanted to tackle first, the producer now wanted players to imagine the game world as a sandbox, with the ability to approach any given task, any location, in any way they want, with full 360 degree access to all the world’s terrain and locales.

At the time, the wording… didn’t make too much sense. We are so used to open worlds with contained areas, corridors, invisible walls; elements which make admittedly large worlds, a bit smaller. These games, are not entirely open.

After multiple delays, E3 2016 was dedicated to showing people what the future of the Zelda series could look like, and Breath of the Wild provided something both familiar and very fresh. This “freshness” was the inspiration for the title. A breath of fresh air, a new experience, and Link to explore this giant wild world. The idea of discoveries being out there, and it’s up to you to find them. The title of the game communicates a lot in this case, and it should have given some long time Zelda players a piece of what they may have been craving for.

Nintendo used this time to demonstrate Aonuma’s idea of puzzle-solving beginning from the moment you decide which direction you want to explore. The response to this is providing a world that is very interactive, and being a character in it’s own right. The player is no longer running across a flat plain with a grass texture called a field, but a play ground with opportunity to experiment, find alternative ways of doing something ordinary, and to become creative with a greater toolset available to them than before, thanks to a larger focus on a robust physics engine, and yes, it’s chemistry engine.

The game is a game of questions. “If I try this, will this work?” and “I expect this to do this” and “I can’t believe that worked”. The game responds to the player with a resounding “yes”, to almost each question asked of it. The opening section to the game is possibly the greatest “tutorial” area, I have ever played in a game. In this section, the player arrives into the world quite literally naked (except for Link’s shorts). Your character is entirely a blank slate, and it is up to the player to proceed through this area, lightly guided towards a goal. The goal is to be able to escape the area, and explore the interesting vast world which you can see all around you, as you explore the Great Plateau.

The Great Plateau incentives the player to explore and complete the area, with the reward being the chains removed and the player being allowed to do any thing, any time, go any where, and tackle any thing they want to, or explore as little of it as they so choose. Think of The Great Plateau area, as any other 3D Zelda game. A contained area, with walls, and the game telling you that you cannot proceed in that direction. The Great Plateau represents something which we are familiar with, and what we are trying to get away from. We no longer wish to be restricted, and we want to explore. Each of the previous games provided glimpses of areas we wanted to explore, but we were never allowed off of our leash. The Great Plateau provides an introduction to the core mechanics we will be experiencing over the course of the game, but just as importantly, the promise of freedom. It isn’t given to you upon starting the game, but is the reward given to the player upon completing this area. The very thought process of obtaining your glider, climbing a tower, and flying off the Great Plateau, is leaving all those restrictions behind. Link finally lands, and it’s up to you. No, not the narrative. It’s up to you which way you go, how you will approach this game, where you will go, what you will discover, and what you will see and do. The Great Plateau provided you with the basics, now you’re on your own.

And I was, I was totally alone. I can’t remember the last time a Nintendo game dropped me in a place and told me “just play”. I didn’t have a companion character telling me where to go, or what I was supposed to be doing. The Great Plateau provided some story context and a motivation for the player, but I could choose to ignore it if I wanted to. Alternatively, I could follow the story, or I could have a very minimal run and just skip a large chunk of the content of the game. I could even decide to run straight to the final boss of the game, after leaving the Plateau. At last a Zelda game has finally delivered on the promise from the original NES title, and actually beating it at it’s own game. This is the most open a Zelda game has ever been. This also provides the player with decisions that are entirely unique to each player, as every player will see the world in an entirely different way.

The level of freedom offered isn’t just down to which quests you tackle, which dungeons you approach or the order you approach them, which mini-dungeons or shrines you will tackle, and what loot you will discover, but an actual feeling of discovery which cannot be understated. You will find yourself running across fields and leaving your horse, your form of vehicular transport in this game, at home in the stables. Instead you will opt to see what’s over that hill, what’s on top of that mountain, what fell from the sky, what is glowing in the water, or what’s flying over head. In addition, the game is packed full of smaller discoveries. I can tell you every time I explore this world, I find something I hadn’t seen before. My Switch tells me I have played “120 hours or more”. To have this amount of content… is staggering. However do not let the volume of content put you off. Yes there is a lot to do, but it’s really more a lot you can-do, not what you need to do. As mentioned before, the amount of content you discover is up to you.

While there are only a few main dungeons in this game, they are accessed through interactions with settlements which further emphasise the feeling of loss and despair, and ruin in this world. The dungeons are accessed via exposition scenes and characters, some of which have received voice acting. Fortunately, Zelda herself is good, and many of the male characters are decent. Link remains silent, but his personality is expressed now and again via other characters, or in texts you find in the world. The quality of the voice acting is subjective, but I don’t find them to be unpleasant. A few of the character voices could have been re-considered and re-cast however, but overall the quality here is acceptable.

The dungeons themselves are typical fair, but each has some method of manipulating the environment to transform the shape of the area you are exploring. While providing a traditional dungeon experience, it’s welcome to see something as old as the series itself being given a slight makeover. The dungeons vary in difficulty. Unfortunately this means they range from easy, to difficult and confusing. While I prefer Zelda games which offer a sense of getting lost inside a labyrinth, the easiest dungeon is near to insulting. Where the game had provided a lack of hand-holding until now, this variance in difficulty found in the dungeons, suggest there’s at least part of the old mindset in here working against the new. Nintendo seemingly do want you to travel to areas in a certain order, and sometimes the immediate opportunity to investigate an area doesn’t always coincide with the challenges faced there.

The boss fights are something that feel perhaps a little underdeveloped, which is a shame considering the many memorable boss fights in nearly all past games. That isn’t to say the boss encounters are bad, but they could have been much more interesting. They aren’t a total misstep, but something that I feel is worth mentioning.

A polarising opinion is in regards to the game’s soundtrack. Breath of the Wild’s soundtrack is very… ambient. There are less heroic tunes, and exciting splashing across the seas or plucking through the fields of Hyrule with sounds to make you feel content. No, all of this has been stripped away. You will be walking through a forest, listening to the sounds of birds rustling through the trees or singing to one another, hearing sea gulls above while the seas crash around the sand beneath, listening to the sounds of deep footsteps as you slowly navigate the snowy mountains, and study the sounds of tropical life in the jungle. But every so often, a piano note will play, and some light music will softly place itself on top of those ambient sounds. The sounds are relaxing, and they are satisfying. This is the soundtrack to this world. In areas where there are settlements and towns, the hustle and bustle is reflected in the music that plays in these areas. A dynamic soundtrack provides a shift between a day theme, and a night theme in these areas. When travelling on horseback, a different tune will play depending on the time of day. And mixed in with all this are classic Zelda tracks, and original music providing some of the old with some of the new. The music played in the shrines is bizarre, but in-keeping with dungeons from other Zelda games. The main theme of this game reflects hope, but also the sense of loss, in a world that narratively speaks this to the player across the entirety of Hyrule. In a word, the music is beautiful in many ways. However there is less here, than what you’d find typically in a 3D Zelda. However it does feel intentional and serves it’s purpose in furthering the feeling of immersion in the world itself. In places music where it needs to be. It’s there, and in areas when you are hunting or surviving in the world, the appropriate sounds are placed.

In closing, it’s hard to fully sum up this game. As I previously mentioned, each player will experience this game in a totally different way. This therefore alters perception in some way, as one player may experience something ground braking, while another does not. But I applaud the efforts made here, to not tailor the experience in a way that is most beneficial to the developer itself. What I mean by this is developing a very large body of content, and being afraid of the player missing and not exploring all of it. This is an issue littered in so many video games, and not just open world games. The amount of time it takes to create an area of a game is unfathomable, and the efforts required of the designers, programmers and artists alike must be immense. The taboo of forcing a player to see everything the developers put into this game is unfamiliar, but this exemplifies the core concept behind this game in a truly incredible way. Freedom. Absolute, freedom. And the valuable experience from Mr Aonuma's experience with the recent re-masters, has allowed the team to tackle the majority of the criticisms of those past titles. No longer is Zelda linear, no longer are you interrupted by a companion, and no longer do you follow the story in a straight path.

I haven’t been hooked to a video game quite like this since Ocarina of Time on the Nintendo 64. It’s taken nearly 20 years to find an experience I had when I was 10 years old. I truly didn’t believe it was possible, and it was my mindset telling me I wasn’t enjoying games the way I used to. I realise now I was wrong. Nintendo are still capable of making games that belong among their very best classics, and I can experience those feelings of bliss that I had mistaken to be merely nostalgia. Only this isn’t nostalgia, this is a new game, with new ideas, and a breath, no, a burst of fresh air. This is the re-invention of The Legend of Zelda. This is Nintendo’s greatest achievement of the modern era, and a blue print for many to follow. Where Nintendo take Zelda next is probably, for the first time in a long time, the most curious and exciting question upon completing this game. But I am extremely excited for what they come up with next. Although this game is not perfect, I still have trouble imagining how they are going to significantly top this one.

The wait was worth it.

I give it 10 posts before this turns into a BotW thread.

yes
 
Last edited:

DunDunDunpachi

Patient MembeR
Quite possibly the greatest Nintendo game of the modern-era a masterpiece

It’s hard to put into words a good way of expressing how I feel after playing The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. This is the latest game in The Legend of Zelda gaming series by Nintendo, and one I have personally been looking forward to for a long time.

Originally musings of a new Zelda game coming for Nintendo’s previous home console, the Wii U, go all the way back to January 2013 when Mr Aonuma, series producer revealed the philosophy that would be the foundation for this new title.

Mr Aonuma and team had decided early on in the development of this title, to focus on making sure this game would be stray from the usual formula that most Zelda games, since Ocarina of Time, have followed. The mission statement for the new Zelda, was to “rethink the conventions of Zelda”. This concepts purpose was to look at the series as a whole to find out what the essence of Zelda is, and to discover what changes are required to be made to prevent the series from becoming stale or past it’s prime.

Unfortunately, one of the areas of criticism concerning the more recent 3D titles, have critiqued Zelda for resting on it’s laurels and being afraid of shaking up the formula, preferring to remain comfortable with the formula developed during Link’s first outing on Nintendo 64. After 5 3D mainline Zelda games, there has been a concern if Nintendo is no longer able to produce a title quite on the scale of their very best, and if this is something now beyond their reach.

Skyward Sword was originally developed with a similar train of thought, in re-thinking the conventions of Zelda. That particular game asked the player to revisit a dungeon they had already completed and encouraged players to interact with towns people to build rapport and be rewarded, much like in Majora’s Mask. With it’s new impressionist artstyle, and upgrading system similar to games such as Monster Hunter, Skyward Sword attempted to distance itself from being seen as an Ocarina of Time clone. Something which many players today still feel Twilight Princess represents.

It is fair to say the 3D Zelda games carry a legacy all of their own, and while Majora’s Mask didn’t receive such a welcoming reception and adoration upon release as it now enjoys, I think we can all agree these games have been good to excellent titles. Another incredible title, The Wind Waker, unfortunately suffered from many issues that later games would attempt to rectify, such as removing the hindrance many found sailing to be, providing more land for Link to explore, a preferable mode of transport, and larger, more fulfilling dungeons. The game’s biggest misstep, in my opinion, was a smattering feeling that the game was perhaps a bit rushed, and this is very evident in the second half of the game.

But what does the history of the 3D Zelda series have to do with Breath of the Wild? Isn’t this the game this review should be focusing on? Well, yes, actually the history of the Zelda franchise is important. Nintendo, specifically Mr Aonuma, was responsible for working on each of the titles I have mentioned in this review. Additionally, he has also been responsible for the various remakes and remasters of each 3D Zelda game (minus any revision of Skyward Sword, which as of typing this, does not yet exist). Because Mr Aonuma has had the valuable experience of re-visiting these titles, and making alterations to each of them along the way for various quality of life improvements, he has been able to re-discover these games in new ways. Not only does he have the experience of long ago creating these gems, but he has now dissected each, and has been able to look at them objectively and reject what is no longer considered acceptable, and provide the players with definitive versions. This isn’t to say those games are perfect, however the breadth of information he has obtained during this process, has enabled him to approach Breath of the Wild in a unique way.

In January 2013, Eiji Aonuma defined re-thinking Zelda’s conventions as, “complete the dungeons in a certain order” and “play by yourself”. The former became the central theme to the eventual game we would receive. That is to say, the very concept of player freedom itself, which has not been present in the series in any substantial way, since the original Legend of Zelda on NES. But this was merely an idea where they wanted to take the new Zelda at this stage, it wouldn’t be until the following year when we would find out what this concept had evolved into.

In June 2014, Nintendo fans and the press were finally shown a visual for what the new Legend of Zelda game for Wii U could be. However, to preface this, Eiji Aonuma introduced the unveiling by first referencing the original 1986 title. It was clear at this stage, that “completing dungeons in a certain order” had evolved into something spanning the very core of the title itself. Instead of limiting the player to make a decision of which dungeon they wanted to tackle first, the producer now wanted players to imagine the game world as a sandbox, with the ability to approach any given task, any location, in any way they want, with full 360 degree access to all the world’s terrain and locales.

At the time, the wording… didn’t make too much sense. We are so used to open worlds with contained areas, corridors, invisible walls; elements which make admittedly large worlds, a bit smaller. These games, are not entirely open.

After multiple delays, E3 2016 was dedicated to showing people what the future of the Zelda series could look like, and Breath of the Wild provided something both familiar and very fresh. This “freshness” was the inspiration for the title. A breath of fresh air, a new experience, and Link to explore this giant wild world. The idea of discoveries being out there, and it’s up to you to find them. The title of the game communicates a lot in this case, and it should have given some long time Zelda players a piece of what they may have been craving for.

Nintendo used this time to demonstrate Aonuma’s idea of puzzle-solving beginning from the moment you decide which direction you want to explore. The response to this is providing a world that is very interactive, and being a character in it’s own right. The player is no longer running across a flat plain with a grass texture called a field, but a play ground with opportunity to experiment, find alternative ways of doing something ordinary, and to become creative with a greater toolset available to them than before, thanks to a larger focus on a robust physics engine, and yes, it’s chemistry engine.

The game is a game of questions. “If I try this, will this work?” and “I expect this to do this” and “I can’t believe that worked”. The game responds to the player with a resounding “yes”, to almost each question asked of it. The opening section to the game is possibly the greatest “tutorial” area, I have ever played in a game. In this section, the player arrives into the world quite literally naked (except for Link’s shorts). Your character is entirely a blank slate, and it is up to the player to proceed through this area, lightly guided towards a goal. The goal is to be able to escape the area, and explore the interesting vast world which you can see all around you, as you explore the Great Plateau.

The Great Plateau incentives the player to explore and complete the area, with the reward being the chains removed and the player being allowed to do any thing, any time, go any where, and tackle any thing they want to, or explore as little of it as they so choose. Think of The Great Plateau area, as any other 3D Zelda game. A contained area, with walls, and the game telling you that you cannot proceed in that direction. The Great Plateau represents something which we are familiar with, and what we are trying to get away from. We no longer wish to be restricted, and we want to explore. Each of the previous games provided glimpses of areas we wanted to explore, but we were never allowed off of our leash. The Great Plateau provides an introduction to the core mechanics we will be experiencing over the course of the game, but just as importantly, the promise of freedom. It isn’t given to you upon starting the game, but is the reward given to the player upon completing this area. The very thought process of obtaining your glider, climbing a tower, and flying off the Great Plateau, is leaving all those restrictions behind. Link finally lands, and it’s up to you. No, not the narrative. It’s up to you which way you go, how you will approach this game, where you will go, what you will discover, and what you will see and do. The Great Plateau provided you with the basics, now you’re on your own.

And I was, I was totally alone. I can’t remember the last time a Nintendo game dropped me in a place and told me “just play”. I didn’t have a companion character telling me where to go, or what I was supposed to be doing. The Great Plateau provided some story context and a motivation for the player, but I could choose to ignore it if I wanted to. Alternatively, I could follow the story, or I could have a very minimal run and just skip a large chunk of the content of the game. I could even decide to run straight to the final boss of the game, after leaving the Plateau. At last a Zelda game has finally delivered on the promise from the original NES title, and actually beating it at it’s own game. This is the most open a Zelda game has ever been. This also provides the player with decisions that are entirely unique to each player, as every player will see the world in an entirely different way.

The level of freedom offered isn’t just down to which quests you tackle, which dungeons you approach or the order you approach them, which mini-dungeons or shrines you will tackle, and what loot you will discover, but an actual feeling of discovery which cannot be understated. You will find yourself running across fields and leaving your horse, your form of vehicular transport in this game, at home in the stables. Instead you will opt to see what’s over that hill, what’s on top of that mountain, what fell from the sky, what is glowing in the water, or what’s flying over head. In addition, the game is packed full of smaller discoveries. I can tell you every time I explore this world, I find something I hadn’t seen before. My Switch tells me I have played “120 hours or more”. To have this amount of content… is staggering. However do not let the volume of content put you off. Yes there is a lot to do, but it’s really more a lot you can-do, not what you need to do. As mentioned before, the amount of content you discover is up to you.

While there are only a few main dungeons in this game, they are accessed through interactions with settlements which further emphasise the feeling of loss and despair, and ruin in this world. The dungeons are accessed via exposition scenes and characters, some of which have received voice acting. Fortunately, Zelda herself is good, and many of the male characters are decent. Link remains silent, but his personality is expressed now and again via other characters, or in texts you find in the world. The quality of the voice acting is subjective, but I don’t find them to be unpleasant. A few of the character voices could have been re-considered and re-cast however, but overall the quality here is acceptable.

The dungeons themselves are typical fair, but each has some method of manipulating the environment to transform the shape of the area you are exploring. While providing a traditional dungeon experience, it’s welcome to see something as old as the series itself being given a slight makeover. The dungeons vary in difficulty. Unfortunately this means they range from easy, to difficult and confusing. While I prefer Zelda games which offer a sense of getting lost inside a labyrinth, the easiest dungeon is near to insulting. Where the game had provided a lack of hand-holding until now, this variance in difficulty found in the dungeons, suggest there’s at least part of the old mindset in here working against the new. Nintendo seemingly do want you to travel to areas in a certain order, and sometimes the immediate opportunity to investigate an area doesn’t always coincide with the challenges faced there.

The boss fights are something that feel perhaps a little underdeveloped, which is a shame considering the many memorable boss fights in nearly all past games. That isn’t to say the boss encounters are bad, but they could have been much more interesting. They aren’t a total misstep, but something that I feel is worth mentioning.

A polarising opinion is in regards to the game’s soundtrack. Breath of the Wild’s soundtrack is very… ambient. There are less heroic tunes, and exciting splashing across the seas or plucking through the fields of Hyrule with sounds to make you feel content. No, all of this has been stripped away. You will be walking through a forest, listening to the sounds of birds rustling through the trees or singing to one another, hearing sea gulls above while the seas crash around the sand beneath, listening to the sounds of deep footsteps as you slowly navigate the snowy mountains, and study the sounds of tropical life in the jungle. But every so often, a piano note will play, and some light music will softly place itself on top of those ambient sounds. The sounds are relaxing, and they are satisfying. This is the soundtrack to this world. In areas where there are settlements and towns, the hustle and bustle is reflected in the music that plays in these areas. A dynamic soundtrack provides a shift between a day theme, and a night theme in these areas. When travelling on horseback, a different tune will play depending on the time of day. And mixed in with all this are classic Zelda tracks, and original music providing some of the old with some of the new. The music played in the shrines is bizarre, but in-keeping with dungeons from other Zelda games. The main theme of this game reflects hope, but also the sense of loss, in a world that narratively speaks this to the player across the entirety of Hyrule. In a word, the music is beautiful in many ways. However there is less here, than what you’d find typically in a 3D Zelda. However it does feel intentional and serves it’s purpose in furthering the feeling of immersion in the world itself. In places music where it needs to be. It’s there, and in areas when you are hunting or surviving in the world, the appropriate sounds are placed.

In closing, it’s hard to fully sum up this game. As I previously mentioned, each player will experience this game in a totally different way. This therefore alters perception in some way, as one player may experience something ground braking, while another does not. But I applaud the efforts made here, to not tailor the experience in a way that is most beneficial to the developer itself. What I mean by this is developing a very large body of content, and being afraid of the player missing and not exploring all of it. This is an issue littered in so many video games, and not just open world games. The amount of time it takes to create an area of a game is unfathomable, and the efforts required of the designers, programmers and artists alike must be immense. The taboo of forcing a player to see everything the developers put into this game is unfamiliar, but this exemplifies the core concept behind this game in a truly incredible way. Freedom. Absolute, freedom. And the valuable experience from Mr Aonuma's experience with the recent re-masters, has allowed the team to tackle the majority of the criticisms of those past titles. No longer is Zelda linear, no longer are you interrupted by a companion, and no longer do you follow the story in a straight path.

I haven’t been hooked to a video game quite like this since Ocarina of Time on the Nintendo 64. It’s taken nearly 20 years to find an experience I had when I was 10 years old. I truly didn’t believe it was possible, and it was my mindset telling me I wasn’t enjoying games the way I used to. I realise now I was wrong. Nintendo are still capable of making games that belong among their very best classics, and I can experience those feelings of bliss that I had mistaken to be merely nostalgia. Only this isn’t nostalgia, this is a new game, with new ideas, and a breath, no, a burst of fresh air. This is the re-invention of The Legend of Zelda. This is Nintendo’s greatest achievement of the modern era, and a blue print for many to follow. Where Nintendo take Zelda next is probably, for the first time in a long time, the most curious and exciting question upon completing this game. But I am extremely excited for what they come up with next. Although this game is not perfect, I still have trouble imagining how they are going to significantly top this one.

The wait was worth it.
N-nani?
 
If you're gonna play that game, Sony has 11 games that score 90+ from the past decade, 14 if you count baseball and a remake.

Nintendo has 6 and that's including 2 near-identical Smash games, 7 if you include WWHD.

See how dumb and arbitrary your point is now? Why does it matter that a game is 97 rather than 94?
List down please so I could list down Nintendo games too
 

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
List down please so I could list down Nintendo games too

I recalculated because I genuinely forgot that the Wii was still going into the early 2010s, that's on me. So the margin is smaller now, though it's still 14-10.

We don't need a list war, I already know which Nintendo games make the cut (and I love most of them), my entire point is that making these lists based on arbitrary MC thresholds is dumb. If you increase it to, say, 85+, things get even more pointless.
 
L
I recalculated because I genuinely forgot that the Wii was still going into the early 2010s, that's on me. So the margin is smaller now, though it's still 14-10.

We don't need a list war, I already know which Nintendo games make the cut (and I love most of them), my entire point is that making these lists based on arbitrary MC thresholds is dumb. If you increase it to, say, 85+, things get even more pointless.
List that down
 

AV

We ain't outta here in ten minutes, we won't need no rocket to fly through space
List that down

Jesus fine, it's:

The Last of Us, MGS4, God of War 3, Uncharted 3, Journey, LittleBigPlanet 2, MLB 10, MLB 11, God of War 2018, Persona 5, Uncharted 4, Bloodborne, SotC Remake, Flower, Astro Bot. 15, actually.
vs
Galaxy 2, Skyward Sword, Xenoblade, Breath of the Wild, 3D World, Smash Wii U, Bayonetta 2, Wind Waker HD, Odyssey, Smash Ultimate. 10.

But don't start comparing the list game-by-game, the whole point is that making lists like these is retarded. That's 90+ company exclusives from the past decade, but we could just as easily include the last 11 years, or make the threshold 89, and the list changes. It doesn't matter. Both companies produce plenty of great first party titles.
 
Last edited:
nuntundu is fur buhbies

hurrrdurrr

Tell me what kind of adult would buy this? shiitttt, might as well go watch barney and tellatubbies while you at it. or splatoon games are targeted for toddlers and weirdo adults.

S6ma9Qu.png
 

Paltheos

Member
I don't know about that. I buy into nearly all the Breath of the Wild hype but this one's not so great. It looks good but it's very, very repetitive. Probably a 5/10, at least for anyone looking for platforming goodness. I agree with some people who've said it's a good game for little kids, that it's not a game for long-time fans.
 
Top Bottom