Let's be real here, it was absolutely abysmal showing. I am buying XSX regardless, but holy shit. It was really bad.Just pointing out the truth. Sony fans love shitting on MS.
No argument there bud. 343 is cancer to HaloLet's be real here, it was absolutely abysmal showing. I am buying XSX regardless, but holy shit. It was really bad.
Hmm, on second inspection I guess it can be seen in the demo as well. But even then it still doesn’t look quite 1;1 to the lighting on the right, but that’s the funny things about these comparisons as they could’ve been cherry-picked
Combat only evolves once.Has Halo changed at all in any capacity since Halo 1? That looks like the same game I played on PC 10+ years ago. I kept thinking to myself watching it......games eventually evolve.....Mario evolved, Sonic evolved, Tomb Raider evolved, EVEN FIGHTING GAMES EVOLVE......
Calling it now, laziest franchise ever.
I mean without like fucking anything funny to add, this looks like X360 version of the game, it's more than terrible.
Ok so he's literally saying THE GAME ISN'T FINISHED AND READY TO SHIP.
Just delay this shit guys, jesus.
No one will blame you if we don't get a half assed Halo at launch.
I'd rather play 3rd party exclusives and upgraded BC games until Halo is done cooking... just put the damn thing back in the oven and lets see it again next year.
Fun to play is going to be the new excuse that xbox fans are going to give, since the 12 Tflops do not impress anyone. If I was a fan of the brand I would feel cheated.
He literally sprints to the warthog in the first 1 minute of gameplay.They eliminated sprint from what I saw of it, so that’s a really good sign
They eliminated sprint from what I saw of it, so that’s a really good sign
Again horizon zero dawn at E3 looked better than this, and what happens when it comes to pc and is 4k 60 whats yiur excuse then?Sony fans think every Sony game looks better then every other game ever. That’s the issue here. The last of us two looks better then this and that keep in mind it’s a game with fewer npcs not open worlds not full 4K and definitely not 60 fps. People blindly make these comparisons like it’s apples to apples when it’s not it’s not like the games are built 1-1.
Lol because they and nintendo make quality gamesI think most people are disappointed regardless but it's no secret that this site heavily favors Sony
Not in less than 4 months they don'tI think people are jumping too early to conclusions. It's still months away and games do improve overall until release
So um,... HALO 3 on PC in 5K 144 FPS people.
How on earth XSX game does not look way better than this?
Wow. This is really bad. Unless the maps are on a completely different level compared to Halo 4 (detested those lackluster maps) then I’m probably going to sit back and observe closely what this game will be like before I purchase and if I purchaseSorry pal, it's in : (
It changes nothing if it's open world or not. HALO 3 was released on X360 13 years ago, quality of art assets and design in this game are far better than in HALO Infinite. Moreover, HALO 3 runs on PC in 5K with 144FPS on a 11TFLOPS GPU, so clearly with the same art assets quality and in open world, Infinite can be easily playable in 4K 60, if not more with DLSS2.0 type of tech or even without it.You're comparing a microscopic area to a huge open world.
Let's be real here, it was absolutely abysmal showing. I am buying XSX regardless, but holy shit. It was really bad.
Looks next-gen, I need to finish this .When you see how are characters models in gears 5 and you see halo infinite...
And it’s 4K/60fps on one X..
Except hellblade 2 and horizon 2, I haven’t seen anything impressive so far on both side.Looks next-gen, I need to finish this .
I feel kinda bad for 343 at this point, they can't innovate too much in fear of being shit on by hardcore halo fans that just want Halo 3 redux over and over again, but they also can't just pander to OG Halo (like this seems to be) because it just comes across like an outdated imitation.
Halo just needs to be taken around the back of the shed and shot at this point. Microsoft still must be kicking themselves for letting go of Bungie because they wanted to make Destiny.
This article just sums it up perfectly really.
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2020-07-24-we-should-talk-about-how-halo-infinite-looks
"Halo is an OG Xbox Game, so its designs come from a time when you couldn't adequately represent the human body and faces and details - Master Chief's whole design is a response to the fact you can't make people look anything else but blocky. It's why he wears armour that makes him look like luggage. The problem is, when 343 take designs from this era and render them with the fidelity possible on modern hardware, you get an art style that's weird and theme-parkish. It's like characters from Halo dressing in Halo-themed monkey suits."
You're comparing a microscopic area to a huge open world. Show a fair comparison instead.
You still have defenders on twitter lol, poor guysThere's no defending this.
I changes tons, developmentwise is way different the asset pipeline, optimizations, performance, rendering that can be done when your goal is open world or level based. It is indeed weird that there are open worlds out there looking 100 times better, but we dont know the problems 343 have had, nor their engine and pipelines etc.It changes nothing if it's open world or not. HALO 3 was released on X360 13 years ago, quality of art assets and design in this game are far better than in HALO Infinite. Moreover, HALO 3 runs on PC in 5K with 144FPS on a 11TFLOPS GPU, so clearly with the same art assets quality and in open world, Infinite can be easily playable in 4K 60, if not more with DLSS2.0 type of tech or even without it.
Well yes, cuz they have every right to want / expect that cuz surprise - they tend to be way better on next gen consoles. Compare ACII with Origins or Odyssey for example in terms of art assets quality, world complexity etc. etc. etc. All of them are open world games, though Origins and Odyseey are much, much bigger, but it didn't stop them from looking way and way better.People tend to think that just because you get a more powerful hardware automatically your game will be better.
Horizon forbidden west was all in-engine trailer. So if it comes to pc which is the most powerful platform of course it will look better then a game built for Xbox one and is only getting an upgrade version for Series X.Again horizon zero dawn at E3 looked better than this, and what happens when it comes to pc and is 4k 60 whats yiur excuse then?
But but but series X is 12 teraflops and theres no way the X version will be held back, Phil told me soHorizon forbidden west was all in-engine trailer. So if it comes to pc which is the most powerful platform of course it will look better then a game built for Xbox one and is only getting an upgrade version for Series X.
i know your guys like to misquote phil and twist everything he saids but that’s ridiculous. Again once the console starts being used to it’s full potential im sure these threads will be goin different once multiplats start being compared. Until they show a game like hellblade that doesn’t have an Xbox one version then we can talk.But but but series X is 12 teraflops and theres no way the X version will be held back, Phil told me so
no man thats what I mean, it should look better IF the team can develop it to be better, not just because of hardware capabilities.Well yes, cuz they have every right to want / expect that cuz surprise - they tend to be way better on next gen consoles. Compare ACII with Origins or Odyssey for example in terms of art assets quality, world complexity etc. etc. etc. All of them are open world games, though Origins and Odyseey are much, much bigger, but it didn't stop them from looking way and way better.
And yeah, sure, we don't know why the game looks the way it is, but it should look way better cuz hardware is more than capable to provide it.
C'mon now, you seriously think that 343 can't do better art & design-wise? Look at HALO 4 and HALO 5, they can do better and they had 5 years to make HALO Infinite.no man thats what I mean, it should look better IF the team can develop it to be better, not just because of hardware capabilities.
FixedHorizon Zero Dawn at E3 which was still 2 years out looked better than a game launching in 4 months on a new generation hardware
well not in an open world as far as we could see. Unfortunately I stopped at Halo 4 so not sure how Halo 5 is done in terms of level structure.C'mon now, you seriously think that 343 can't do better art & design-wise? Look at HALO 4 and HALO 5, they can do better and they had 5 years to make HALO Infinite.
At least HB, Fable, will look next gen as they are all at least 3-4 years away. Which on its own is disappointing... Hellblade might get a 2022 release at the best. 3 years waiting for a decent exclusive. Jeezi know your guys like to misquote phil and twist everything he saids but that’s ridiculous. Again once the console starts being used to it’s full potential im sure these threads will be goin different once multiplats start being compared. Until they show a game like hellblade that doesn’t have an Xbox one version then we can talk.
I don't even believe it's a new engine, just the old one with some improvements and a new name (Slipspace). It looks very similar to Halo 5 except possibly worse.
And I thought Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Watchdog Legions looked bad... now I look at them as the pinnacle of what I can expect on the XSX ,at launch and beyond.