Zadom
Member
Maybe I'll just put you on ignore instead.
I have no one on ignore. I am afraid of no ones opinions.
Last edited:
Maybe I'll just put you on ignore instead.
This is a temporary problem.
That looks like a cutscene.
Pretty much. They're the same cupcake with the same icing. Everyone is pretty much arguing over which cupcake has more sprinkles at this pointYou can make that argument for every game so far, so I guess they are all even then?
and not a cutscene with drops to the 40's on PS5, locked 60 on the X.
Why do you keep saying that to me as if it means anything?But of course early kit of development not apply to the ps5 right?
If you want the best quality mode - Raytracing, the Series X wins. If you want 120fps, the PS5 wins. They recommend to turn off dualsense triggers for multiplayer.What's the TL;DR?
Only in one scenario and falls behind in another.This is definitely a win for the xbox series x.
I am replaying all cod games campaigns (starting with cod4) and now I am no Ghost. It's surprisingly good. Looks great at 4k with 4xTXAA too.
MW and MW2 were awesome but aged a lot.
MW3 was kinda bad and worse looking.
World at War was only good in Russian missions
Black Ops is awesome,
Black Ops 2 is a mess of bad story and weird gameplay aside from few cool Missions with Harper.
That's it so far. I remember Infinite Warfare being my fav and bo3 being trash. But I also remember Ghost being trash and now I kinda like it...
Isn't it supposed to be more powerful the series X? In what way is a win to have selective scene with better FPS? We need to be an Xbox fanatic to not admit itThis is definitely a win for the xbox series x.
It has higher fps with next generation ray tracing turned on plus supports vrr so even in the 120fps mode the dips aren't seen.
You'd have to be a playstation fanatic to not agree.
I actually think though once ps5 gets vrr and a patch for ray tracing mode it may be the better version.
But if xbox can figure out their supposed gdk api stuff then it will end up being too close for a war battle!
and not a cutscene with drops to the 40's on PS5, locked 60 on the X.
10:54Give me the timestamp because for some reason it cannot open the link.
Starts at 10:50Give me the timestamp because for some reason it cannot open the link.
PS5 for 120hz it is.
It is shocking. But at the same time extremely happy that both consoles are having a strong start, much better than the travesty Xbox went through in 2013.
Downgraded gun smoke on XSX timestamped. Watch in slo mo.
Much more side by side examples on VG Tech vids.
Let's be honest. It's the mode that 99% of people will have access to. The other not so much.Only in one scenario and falls behind in another.
People are too desperate for a "win".
If you dont have a VRR TV the PS5 is better for 120hz gameplay.How atm, VRR you not seeing any judder on XSX
You do realise that at the part where XSX dropped more frames is in one single scene from one mission, but runs 99.9% at a stable 120hz?If you dont have a VRR TV the PS5 is better for 120hz gameplay.
This one is too close. We wait for the next comparison.
They just need to refinish it with a patch.PS5 got trashed in 60Hz RT mode.
So PS5 random drops started after a patch?Vgtech analysis:
There was an issue on PS5 where the frame rate could randomly drop below 60fps during scenes that it previously ran at a solid 60fps. This issue wasn't encountered on Xbox Series X.
Digital Foundry:
Series X is more stable in RT because it's more powerful and lead to a better experience
But impartial and genuine.
I enjoyed the Ghosts campaign a lot, actually. Shame the cliffhanger ending will never be followed up on.
Who said that?So PS5 random drops started after a patch?
How so? Xbox clearly does better at 60fps with RT. 40 vs 60 fps is not close at all (during a few drops of course, not sustained).
The PS5 was better at 120 FPS, but not many people are going to have a 120FPS capable tv. I mean I have one and I even I don't think it's important because when we start hitting truly next-gen games, I think 120 is out the window.
This one is clearly a win for Xbox.
They wont admit that which is why he's backing out of the thread. If the PS5 is ahead even by the smallest of margins, "Xbox is terible" and memes galore.How so? Xbox clearly does better at 60fps with RT. 40 vs 60 fps is not close at all.
The PS5 was better at 120 FPS, but not many people are going to have a 120FPS capable tv. I mean I have one and I even I don't think it's important because when we start hitting truly next-gen games, I think 120 is out the window.
This one is clearly a win for Xbox.
Folks seem to talk about there TV's for VRR... Am I the only one that has for a long time, used a monitor for console gaming?
I seem to enjoy it more than what a TV ever did.
When 120 is a win for Xbox FEW PEOPLE HAVE THOSE TVs.
When 120 is a win for PS5 OMG LOOK HOW MUCH THEY PWNED THE SeX!!!!
And you do realize the PS5 dropped in frames in 1 gameplay scene with RT turned on? Also more graphical effects such as gun smoke appear on PS5 at 120hz but not the X.You do realise that at the part where XSX dropped more frames is in one single scene from one mission, but runs 99.9% at a stable 120hz?
If it's a random drop here and there could be anything from a network issue to a caching error I suppose.So PS5 random drops started after a patch?