Just because it has colorful trees and skies doesn't mean it looks the BEST.
LITERALLY within the first 5 minutes of playing the game the technical incompetence at sucker-punch on DISPLAY:
or is it last gen? you know what i'm talking about, anyway let's take a look at this beauty, and i dare anyone to name a game more beautiful than GoT (fight me)
more:
it's even more beautiful in action:
Definitely agreed. Big different between art direction and technically the best looking game. It looks good, yes. But far from the best looking games from this gen.Best looking? Would agree.
A lot of people are going to mistake looks for graphic fidelity in this thread.
This is the real GOTY
Imagine Ghost of Tsushima 2!!!
It's part of the intuitive waypoint system.I have to say it does look beautiful, however, why in the world is it so windy?
Ok thanks, I heard it's running at 60fps on PS5, so I might pick this up when it drops below £30 one day...It's part of the intuitive waypoint system.
I think the most impressive thing about Got is it was produced on a 1.84 flop machine...
I like the it’s aesthetics but I personally like Sekiro’s visuals waaay more. To me it has much more memorable locals.
Also has much better animation
Just because it has colorful trees and skies doesn't mean it looks the BEST.
LITERALLY within the first 5 minutes of playing the game the technical incompetence at sucker-punch on DISPLAY:
For when you go back to it, if you still find it too flat there is an option in the menu called "cinematic contrast" or something like that, that might help you out.I'm playing Valhalla in Ps5 and it looks more beautiful (and obviously better technically) to me.
I played GoT only a few hours in PS5 but my impression is textures are very low res and in general it looks a bit flat for my taste. But I will play it someday for sure because combat seemed very rewarding.