TrueLegend
Member
Which one you prefer?
Last edited:
metacriticAnyone who says metacritic is a dumbass.
Anyone who says metacritic is a dumbass.
metacritic
Sadly, that's human nature.The one that validates my opinion.
They're almost exactly the same thing. I guess I don't really care that much. I like that reviews have scores for quick reference, but then I ultimately decide myself and have specific reviewers I personally trust more than others.
Posts above detail some of the differences. But then you step back and it amounts to like .... 1 pt difference lol.Exactly what I was going to say. What's the difference really? They are usually the same or maybe a point different. Having said that, whenever I want to look up reviews for a game I use metacritic for no other reason than it is a habit and opencritic is an afterthought.
Opencritic, because meta has toooooooo many popup ads.
Anyone who says metacritic is a dumbass.
Pop ups still exist? I haven't seen one in about a decade, every browser has built in protectionOpencritic, because meta has toooooooo many popup ads.
Ghost of Tsushima is underrated, even native Japanese historian appreciate the the games authenticity, that tells something.Neither. I don't think entertainment in general should be validated with a number. It's all too subjective and does nothing for me.
Games like Ghost of Tsushima (83) or Guardians of the Galaxy (80) are better for me than plenty of +90 games out there on metacritic.
Not your mom, that's for sure.Which one is immune to the Nintendo bump?
If you could save your mother or play BotW one last time, what would you choose?Not your mom, that's for sure.
Sorry but Ocarina is NOT the greatest game of all time.GameRankings but those days are gone, and yeah I mostly used it for the indexed reviews.
GameRankings but those days are gone, and yeah I mostly used it for the indexed reviews.
Hah!Sorry but Ocarina is NOT the greatest game of all time.
Which one you prefer?