Wut.
Wasn't the Wii the first of the Nintendo consoles to be the least powerful of its generation?
Isn't that what he is saying? Or did you quote the wrong post?
Wut.
Wasn't the Wii the first of the Nintendo consoles to be the least powerful of its generation?
This is true. Nintendo pretty much always releases underpowered hardware. I don't see why this would come as any surprise to anyone.
This is true. Nintendo pretty much always releases underpowered hardware. I don't see why this would come as any surprise to anyone.
I'd hope I speak and the world changes, but you have to start somewhere.I tried that. Nobody listens. Everybody's so quick to call you Nintendo Defense Force or put spin on your arguments.
So you make some jokes and suddenly the thread changes.
Their consoles aren't underpowered but ever since the SNES they've been hamstrung by one thing or another. The N64 was due to using cartridges that caused bigger games to be $$$$$. The Gamecube used mini-DVDs. The Wii was drastically underpowered compared to it's competitors. They have a track record of doing things that make things harder for developers.
Is there ever?1,060 posts. That's a lot to read. Is there anything of note past the first two pages?
Shit even the snes had a crappy flaw, a slow CPU
1,060 posts. That's a lot to read. Is there anything of note past the first two pages?
Can the Wii Tablet be any more costly than that Kinect thing?It is probably close to power to 360/PS3 doing some things better, maybe even some things worse since that controller won't be so cheap....
...
This is true. Nintendo pretty much always releases underpowered hardware. I don't see why this would come as any surprise to anyone.
Can the Wii Tablet be any more costly than that Kinect thing?
If this thread has proved anything, it's that many, many "hardcore" gamers care about graphics as measures of a system's worth. I doubt you'll see some gentlemen's agreement between Sony and Microsoft to cut back on graphics in light of their efforts to appease this group, and because of this, the arm's race will continue.
Whether or not this strategy is viable for many more years is another matter, one that I don't think either Sony or Microsoft have truly considered.
This post is great1,060 posts. That's a lot to read. Is there anything of note past the first two pages?
Memories only go back about a generation.
For example, see how many people think of Nintendo as some sort of game selling titan in spite of the decade or so that preceded the Wii.
Not really.
And then the legacy of arguably and not so arguably underpowered systems starts.
- NES was outdone by kind of dated by the time it reached the West, but it couldn't really be considered underpowered due to lack of competition.
- The Gameboy was very underpowered compared to the Lynx, Game Gear, and Turbo Express, but won anyway due to its vastly superior library.
- In its time, the SNES was bested only by the Neo Geo and transitional consoles like the 3DO and Jaguar.
- The N64 was interesting - It far outperformed the Playstation in some areas, while falling behind in others. Its Achilles heel was the medium rather than the rest of the setup.
- The GBA, again, came to a market with no real competitors. It was basically a SNES-and-then-some in terms of raw capabilities.
- The Gamecube was significantly more powerful than the PS2, and was mostly limited by its storage medium and a lack of 3rd party support, similar to the N64.
That's reaching and you know it. The reason the games weren't mega sellers is because the hardware wasn't a mega seller. Hell it was barely a seller. It took five years to get just over double the unit tally of the Dreamcast.Oh shit
Memories only go back about a generation.
For example, see how many people think of Nintendo as some sort of game selling titan in spite of the decade or so that preceded the Wii.
That's reaching and you know it. The reason the games weren't mega sellers is because the hardware wasn't a mega seller. Hell it was barely a seller. It took five years to get just over double the unit tally of the Dreamcast.
Of course Nintendo's games would have trouble selling during that era.
I don't see why not, Kinect doesn't really have a lot to it. A tiny motor, a couple of cameras, 4 microphones and a USB controller.
Oh shit
Knives need to be put up.
You guys look like idiots.
Pokemon. It never existed.
Nintendo in that era had no idea what the mass market wanted. And those expectations shift from generation to generation.Wait, what? So now it's hardware that moves software?
Nintendo wasn't good at making very popular games. If they were, those systems would have sold just like the wii.
I was talking about all of you. Angry Nintendo fans, angry every one else. You all look like idiots arguing back and forth using the exact same arguments every time.Not at all. Unless you were a Mario/Zelda or the like.
Man are we getting trolled hard with these rumors. Wii U ranging from less than current HD twins to 5 x. Durango going from mild Wii like increase in power to 6x to Dual GPU monster beast. Well then there's Orbis but whatever
Wii U stuck with unpowerful graphics confirmed.
The secret is that the WiiU's CPU and GPU are upgradable, but the upgrades are sold in boosters like a collectible card game. Get ready to buy lots of packs if you want the ultra rare chips that enable 1080P and 60 FPS!
It's not like the Wii U controller has anything special in it either. It's a controller with a screen, a microphone, two (?) speakers and a camera.
The secret is that the WiiU's CPU and GPU are upgradable, but the upgrades are sold in boosters like a collectible card game. Get ready to buy lots of packs if you want the ultra rare chips that enable 1080P and 60 FPS!
I will state what I'm about to say is a definite.
Until we've explored every input option, every play mechanic, games won't need the newest tech to make an impact.
They'll just need a defining "hook".
Those games that have defined mechanics though. They do need a tech boost occasionally to change core mechanics.
Now it's LESS powerful? Hahaha, so many contradictory rumors.
This .gif does a good job of summing up this entire thread.
Penile controllers.I want to input something somewhere dammit
If the WiiU is on par, slightly stronger, slightly weaker than the PS3/360 that won't stop beautiful games from being released on the system. It potentially does mean the system won't be able to handle the highest end of videogame visuals.
Apparently with the wii graphics didn't matter, but with the Wii-U it does so much that the thought of it only doing current gen stuff is flat out heresy. Today's games look so f'ing awful after all.
My current working hypothesis is that the weaker Nintendo's hardware is compared to its competition, the more money Nintendo will make. Nintendo might be in trouble, though, because of the iPad.Apparently with the wii graphics didn't matter, but with the Wii-U it does so much that the thought of it only doing current gen stuff is flat out heresy. Today's games look so f'ing awful after all.
It's not like the Wii U controller has anything special in it either. It's a controller with a screen, a microphone, two (?) speakers and a camera.