Was it ever explained why they choose to do this orally instead of using wet cloth/sponge like before?
the mohel puts his mouth directly on the newborns circumcised penis and sucks away the blood
How far is too far when protecting religious freedoms?
How many people in this thread have a bigger problem with a non sexual act (albeit antiquated) rather than the genital mutilation?
I'm not defending the ridiculous form of cleaning, but to automatically attach a sexualized characteristic is pretty fucked.
The moment they want to cut a babies penis, it has already gone way too far.
How many more must have gone unclaimed or hidden away =/
CULTURE
In association with IGNORANCE®
Well that part isn't going away, as people don't care about male genital mutilation.
Talk about female genital mutilation, and it's completely different.
But then people compare the most extreme form female genital mutilation to male.
Any genital mutilation done on babies unless done for a real medical emergency should not be done.
Let that person decide if they want it once they're an adult.
Though the defense force for male genital mutilation is pretty strong.
Because they are completely different. They aren't even comparable.
i'm actually shocked. what the fuck? the people involved are insane. just utterly unacceptable, tradition or not. lock them up.
btw, are there ANY non-religious communities that do something similar and if so how would they justify it? or is this something that can only happen with religion?
Because they are completely different. They aren't even comparable.
Religion is culture, and the driving force behind it is ignorance, in a way. So nothing in your post contradicts mine!CULTURE
In association with IGNORANCE®
What the fucking fuck did I just fucking read ?
I'm cut. No big deal. Never had my shlong sucked by a dude.I'm circumcised and now I'll never be able to sleep again, what the fuck?
Am I the only one here who's circumcised?
I was scrolling, waiting for your name to pop up in here.
in which the mohel puts his mouth directly on the newborns circumcised penis and sucks away the blood
what
in which the mohel puts his mouth directly on the newborn’s circumcised penis and sucks away the blood.
Ten of the babies were hospitalized, at least two developed brain damage and two died
He's right.
Assuming that a male circumcision is done correctly (i.e. no STD-ridden mohels sucking your blood), the male will be able to have an orgasm and enjoy sex. The goal is either to mark a male as part of a specific religion or tradition, or for cleanliness.
Assuming that a female circumcision is done correctly, the female will /not/ be able to have an orgasm and enjoy sex. The goal is to render the female docile and virginal, and unwilling to cheat on her future husband.
So, totally different.
Nonsense, mutilation is mutilation.
Forced baby circumcision is fucked up .... for shame.
Yeah i agree, and i think any parent that allows their child to have their ears pierced should be dragged through the streets, pushed against a wall and shot.
I'm seeing it on younger and younger kids. Sickens me.
I wish I had a foreskin.
Foreskins are nice. You are really missing out.