Nizz
Member
6'3 looking down at the little people.
5'3" giving you the middle finger.
6'3 looking down at the little people.
As boys grow, the importance of height is drummed into them incessantly. "My, how tall you are!" the relatives squeal with approval. Or, with scorn, "Don't you want to grow up big and strong?"
"If a short man is normally assertive, then he's seen as having Napoleonic tendencies," says David Weeks, a clinical psychologist at Royal Edinburgh Hospital. "If he is introverted and mildly submissive, then he's seen as a wimp."
One of the most elegant height experiments was reported in 1968 by an Australian psychologist, Paul Wilson. He introduced the same unfamiliar man to five groups of students, varying only the status attributed to the stranger. In one class, the newcomer was said to be a student, in another a lecturer, right up to being a professor from Cambridge University. Once the visitor had left the room, each group was asked to estimate the man's height, along with that of the instructor. The results are plotted in the chart above. Not only was the "professor" thought to be more than two inches taller than the "student"; the height estimates rose in proportion to his perceived status.
Consider six aspects of a supposedly advanced culture.
Politics. In all but three American presidential elections this century, the taller man has won. By itself this might be a coincidence. And of course some short politicians thrive (examples include France's Francois Mitterrand and Britain's Harold Wilson). But the pattern is still clear, and is also found in:
Business. A survey in 1980 found that more than half the chief executives of America's Fortune 500 companies stood six feet tall or more. As a class, these wekepei were a good 2.5 inches taller than average; only 3% were peritsi, 5'7" or less. Other surveys suggest that about 90% of chief executives are of above-average height. Similarly for:
Professional status. Looking at several professions, one study found that people in high-ranking jobs were about two inches taller than those down below, a pattern that held even when comparing men of like educational and socioeconomic status. Senior civil servants in Britain, for instance, tend to be taller than junior ones. Shorter people also have worse:
Jobs. Give job recruiters two invented resumes that have been carefully matched except for the candidates' height, as one study did in 1969. Fully 72% of the time, the taller man is "hired". And when they are hired, they tend also to earn rather more:
Money. In 1994 James Sargent and David Blanchflower, of America's Dartmouth College, analysed a sample of about 6,000 male Britons whose progress was monitored from birth to early adulthood. Short teenaged boys made less money when they became young adults (aged 23) than their taller peers--even after other attributes, such as scores on ability tests or parents' social status, were factored out. For every four inches of height in adolescence, earnings went up more than 2% in early adulthood. Another survey, of graduates of the University of Pittsburgh, found that those who were 6'2" or taller received starting salaries 12% higher than those under six feet.
Not only do tall people grow richer, rich people grow taller. They enjoy well-nourished childhoods and better health. The stature-success nexus further bolsters the social preference for height. And that preference is expressed in a coin that is even more precious than money, namely:
Sex. Mating opportunities are, at least in evolutionary terms, the ultimate prize of status. And here is the final humiliation for short men. When 100 women were asked to evaluate photographs of men whom they believed to be either tall, average or short, all of them found the tall and medium specimens "significantly more attractive" than the short ones. In another study, only two of 79 women said they would go on a date with a man shorter than themselves (the rest, on average, wanted to date a man at least 1.7 inches taller). "The universally acknowledged cardinal rule of dating and mate selection is that the male will be significantly taller than his female partner," write Mr Martel and Mr Biller. "This rule is almost inviolable." For short men, the sexual pickings are therefore likely to be slim.
I wanted to get into this conversation when I saw this thread on my phone this morning when I woke up, but I've just been too damn busy all day. That said, I probably won't read through the last 9 pages to see where the discussion has gone, but if it hasn't been posted, there was a great article published in The Economist in 1995 entitled Short Guys Finish Last by Jonathan Rauch. It is really quite short. When it was printed it was only about 2.5 pages in length if you were to remove the images. I'll offer a few choice quotes for those who are interested, but I recommend reading it since it's extremely brief. Again, I apologize if some of this has already been discussed. Edit: I just realized that one statistic mentioned below is in the OP even![]()
I wanted to get into this conversation when I saw this thread on my phone this morning when I woke up, but I've just been too damn busy all day. That said, I probably won't read through the last 9 pages to see where the discussion has gone, but if it hasn't been posted, there was a great article published in The Economist in 1995 entitled Short Guys Finish Last by Jonathan Rauch. It is really quite short. When it was printed it was only about 2.5 pages in length if you were to remove the images. I'll offer a few choice quotes for those who are interested, but I recommend reading it since it's extremely brief. Again, I apologize if some of this has already been discussed. Edit: I just realized that one statistic mentioned below is in the OP even![]()
You might not seem imposing but I tend to think that slimmer people actually look slightly taller than they actually are. Or at least that is my experience; people tend to think I am around 5'9" or that my father is around 6' - 6'1".
Oh, looks like being short is worse than death itself or being a Cubs fan.
That said, I probably won't read through the last 9 pages to see where the discussion has gone, but if it hasn't been posted, there was a great article published in The Economist in 1995 entitled Short Guys Finish Last by Jonathan Rauch.
This was really interesting. I still don't see how we could effectively legislate against unconscious biases like attractiveness and height though, rendering these LostVoyager threads largely pointless.
Anything we can't effectively legislate is pointless to discuss?
Well, in a tongue-in-cheek manner that article raised the idea that short people should benefit from the same legal protections as other people disadvantaged due to factors beyond their control. That has been the general societal response to such matters - along with education, I suppose. I just don't see how these strategies could be repurposed here in response to biases so innate.
As boys grow, the importance of height is drummed into them incessantly. "My, how tall you are!" the relatives squeal with approval. Or, with scorn, "Don't you want to grow up big and strong?"
This was really interesting. I still don't see how we could effectively legislate against unconscious biases like attractiveness and height though, rendering these LostVoyager threads largely pointless.
I wouldn't mind if there was a law where relatives can't legally spout this societal shit to kids who're emotionally impressionable and fuck them in the head for years to come.
Relatives can be the worst. Since they don't know anything about a kid's personality, they go straight for the image.
You might not seem imposing but I tend to think that slimmer people actually look slightly taller than they actually are. Or at least that is my experience; people tend to think I am around 5'9" or that my father is around 6' - 6'1".
You can shave a beard... I do not mean to demean that form of discrimination if you are experience but I feel heightism is different because it is not as controllable
It's very cruel, but the point is that it's very innate. Out of curiosity, did something like this happen to you or a sibling as well while growing up? I just shared my experience with my relatives above, so I'm curious![]()
Doesn't really relate to me, but I know many people who've had that experience. Not really as a kid, everyone only brought up how cute I was and how I never used to cry.
But around puberty, dad and grandpa started comparing to other cousins. And when you're in an extended family, that's rough going. Dad wanted me to be way taller than him, kept on reassuring me I'd keep on growing until 21 (lol). I told them how I don't really care, and they only stopped caring when I was 5'7" (acceptable for asians).
Ungodly has a negative connotation.
... I didn't know there were GAFfers who were that young.
And I think I was around 5'2" - 5'4" at that age; my father is 5'11" and my mother is 5'; I ended up being 5'7".
Did that sound ageist?
MVP: You can always be my body guard if your career as an NBA player falls through.
Yea relatives suck.
"My how you've grown! You're so much taller than last year!"
Fuck you, no I'm not.
Yea relatives suck.
"My how you've grown! You're so much taller than last year!"
Fuck you, no I'm not.
I'm 5'5. If you're not into taller girls, you're doing it wrong. I think I've dated one girl who was shorter than me. Everyone else has been at least 5'7, one was 5'10. It's awesome. And the only way to go.
The only guy who Heightism really affects is the short guys who have a chip on their shoulder for being short. I've never had a problem with it, because being short never really bothered me. I don't think I've ever been discriminated against for my height. If I have been, I wasn't aware of it. If you don't give a fuck that you are short, no one else will, either. I can ride all the roller coasters I want, so I don't give a fuck. The only issue I have with being short is it is hard to find clothes that fit well. Pants especially. I'm not a super skinny short guy. I'm not fat, but I am a bit stocky and have especially thick legs. I always have to buy a size up so my pants aren't super tight and uncomfortable around my thighs. Which means all my pants are either too long, too baggy, or both. It's the only problem I've ever had being a short guy.
You might not seem imposing but I tend to think that slimmer people actually look slightly taller than they actually are. Or at least that is my experience; people tend to think I am around 5'9" or that my father is around 6' - 6'1".
I'm 25 and have been the same height for 9 years and I still get the "you've grown so much" line.
This was really interesting. I still don't see how we could effectively legislate against unconscious biases like attractiveness and height though, rendering these LostVoyager threads largely pointless.
The only issue I have with being short is it is hard to find clothes that fit well. Pants especially. I'm not a super skinny short guy. I'm not fat, but I am a bit stocky and have especially thick legs. I always have to buy a size up so my pants aren't super tight and uncomfortable around my thighs. Which means all my pants are either too long, too baggy, or both. It's the only problem I've ever had being a short guy.
Are you Asian-Indian? (guessing by your avatar). I'd always thought they were much taller than eastern and south eastern asians by a fair bit... To rephrase that, in my experience at university, Asian-Indians always seemed about on par with Caucasians, but I realize that may not be the case.
I prefer short girls.
In fact, I almost exclusively go out with short girls.
Am I myself being heightist, or am I subverting the discrimination?
Yea it never seems to end. Every time.I'm 25 and have been the same height for 9 years and I still get the "you've grown so much" line.
Totally agree with everything you just said :lolHaha
I remember growing up one thing I always dreaded about going to visit relatives or my mother's friends was that my mother would always do the "Oh, oh! Stand back to back with him! I want to compare how tall you are!"
... And I could just tell eyeballing it that I was around, say, shoulder-level. "... Mom, he's taller than me. You can tell just looking."
It was something that made me feel insecure about it for a long time, since it just seemed designed to embarrass me about how everyone my age was outgrowing me. I know tall people get the same obsessing over their height - and unlike mine, it doesn't stop when they get older - but I would take the embarrassment of being taller than average and having it pointed out than being shorter than average.
My height does not bother me now the way it did then, partially due to the fact that I grew to "a tick below average," but I would still probably feel a little badly if someone were to arbitrarily compare heights just to point out my being short, not so much for that itself but more for reminding me of an experience that I always found humiliating when I was younger.
So you have the body structure of Jack Black. Nothing wrong with that.
You might not seem imposing but I tend to think that slimmer people actually look slightly taller than they actually are. Or at least that is my experience; people tend to think I am around 5'9" or that my father is around 6' - 6'1".
Eh. I am 6'1'' and it is a chore finding clothes that fit. A 30/34 pant size is so hard to come across, and finding a shirt that is long enough without looking like a parachute is often a practice in futility.I'm 6'2"
I think 6'2" - 6'3" is around the perfect height IMO. You're tall without being too tall. It's a lot easier to find clothes and shoes too![]()
Good taste alert.I'm a reverse heightist, I'm almost exclusively attracted to girls below 5'7"