• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo posts $160M net income, cuts 3DS/Wii U/NDS/Wii forecasts

Portugeezer

Member
fYptSN6.jpg


oh boy....

Before I judge him, can someone clarify what SW means?
 
I think most people forget what the word: profit, means.

Most companies will sell new hard at a loss, and not make any profit on their launch dates. If Nintendo, with his current line up, make a profit... I can't even think about the possibilities when major titles are released.

And sure, people will claim that Orbis and Durango will kill the WiiU sells... let's stay frosty and wait for date and price. Because with the specifications I saw... the WiiU is still very competitive price/power (and add that "new feeling" with the new controller).
 
I think most people forget what the word: profit, means.

Most companies will sell new hard at a loss, and not make any profit on their launch dates. If Nintendo, with his current line up, make a profit... I can't even think about the possibilities when major titles are released.

And sure, people will claim that Orbis and Durango will kill the WiiU sells... let's stay frosty and wait for date and price. Because with the specifications I saw... the WiiU is still very competitive price/power (and add that "new feeling" with the new controller).

I don't think you know what it means. Nintendo profited from a revaluation of foreign assets because of weaker Yen. Their core business is still loss making.
 

Madouu

Member
As someone who's not really a long-term Sales-Age expert, but does enjoy trying to get a better understanding of the business-side, I personally think getting an accurate idea of how the 3DS is performing to be one of the most difficult nuts to crack. My understanding of it is as follows: it got off to a rough start, but the price cut/ambassador program/big Mario games more or less salvaged it. As is, it's more or less doing "OK," but is underperforming Nintendo's expectations and is only truly soaring in Japan.

That's how I understand the situation. Basically, the overall assessment to me seems rather mediocre thus far. But there's no shortage of talk in terms of assessing it at the extremes that really muddies the waters for me. Some seem to classify it almost as an abject failure, while others just focus on the "tens of millions" sold to conclude that it's well on its way to being a very respectable successor to the smash hit DS.

It's too early to say if it is gonna be a very big success (>120M) or just achieve decent but still a bit disappointing numbers (60-70M). Of course it could end up falling in anything between those lines. As long as people don't give numbers on what they consider a success or a failure though, it's hard to have any kind of discussion.

This will help you have an idea of where the 3ds stands right now compared to GBA and DS: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47074766&postcount=251. As you can see, they're still pretty closely lumped up together, the question will be what kind of momentum will the 3DS carry into the next financial year or two which will probably be a deciding factor on where its total sales will end up. (The DS kept soaring while the GBA started settling down a bit).

I feel it is very fair to say that calling the 3DS a failure at this point is exaggerated as it is pretty much out of the equation now unless something terrible happens. My personal opinion is that it's doing pretty good and looking at the releases planned in NA & Europe this year, I think sales will start picking up in these territories too, securing a bright feature for the handheld.
 
Pacter wasn't right anyway, he called the attach rate (4.36) unrealistic iirc. That's barely changed in the revised projection (4), and they nearly hit it this quarter (3.82).
 
It's too early to say if it is gonna be a very big success (>120M) or just achieve decent but still a bit disappointing numbers (60-70M). Of course it could end up falling in anything between those lines. As long as people don't give numbers on what they consider a success or a failure though, it's hard to have any kind of discussion.

This will help you have an idea of where the 3ds stands right now compared to GBA and DS: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47074766&postcount=251. As you can see, they're still pretty closely lumped up together, the question will be what kind of momentum will the 3DS carry into the next financial year or two which will probably be a deciding factor on where its total sales will end up. (The DS kept soaring while the GBA started settling down a bit).

I feel it is very fair to say that calling the 3DS a failure at this point is exaggerated as it is pretty much out of the equation now unless something terrible happens. My personal opinion is that it's doing pretty good and looking at the releases planned in NA & Europe this year, I think sales will start picking up in these territories too, securing a bright feature for the handheld.

Thanks for the info and your insight.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
It's too early to say if it is gonna be a very big success (>120M) or just achieve decent but still a bit disappointing numbers (60-70M). Of course it could end up falling in anything between those lines. As long as people don't give numbers on what they consider a success or a failure though, it's hard to have any kind of discussion.

This will help you have an idea of where the 3ds stands right now compared to GBA and DS: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47074766&postcount=251. As you can see, they're still pretty closely lumped up together, the question will be what kind of momentum will the 3DS carry into the next financial year or two which will probably be a deciding factor on where its total sales will end up. (The DS kept soaring while the GBA started settling down a bit).

I feel it is very fair to say that calling the 3DS a failure at this point is exaggerated as it is pretty much out of the equation now unless something terrible happens. My personal opinion is that it's doing pretty good and looking at the releases planned in NA & Europe this year, I think sales will start picking up in these territories too, securing a bright feature for the handheld.
3DS progress resembling DS/GBA progress is a damn miracle considering the price differences.

Wii U isn't as impressive right now, but I think even Nintendo expected that.
 

Codeblue

Member
I enjoy Pachter's weird obsession with Nintendo fanboys. He's gone from "That one guy who won't shut up about Wii HD" to Gamefaqs forum poster in his pursuit of arguing with them.

Yo, Pachter. You're supposed to be a professional. Don't engage.
 
To be fair, when it comes to Nintendo post-2009 he has been right pretty much across the board.

Except when just recently he said Wii U would be sold out and 3DS is ,,toast''. Then his anti-nostradamus magic worked as usual. And probably tons of other goofy shit before that.
Defending Pachter is just... no. Just no.
 
I enjoy Pachter's weird obsession with Nintendo fanboys. He's gone from "That one guy who won't shut up about Wii HD" to Gamefaqs forum poster in his pursuit of arguing with them.

Yo, Pachter. You're supposed to be a professional. Don't engage.

It works for Kamiya but Pachter isn't a rockstar.

(he thinks he is though)
 

hellclerk

Everything is tsundere to me
If you read things carefully it's not like that, Iwata stated that the company is losing money on Wii U hardware and software sales are not at the expected levels to make up for it.
The company is posting an operative loss and forecasting an operative loss for the full FY, so they're losing money.
Nintendo being back in black with net profits is basically a gift of the weak yen to japanese companies (other big exporters like Toyota, Canon, Sony, Panasonic will benefit of this as well).
There is a reason the stock is down almost 8% today.
So no there isn't a lot of room to cut the price on Wii U without keeping a losing money strategy.

Wasn't an unexpectedly strong Yen the primary reason for previous red quarters in the last couple years? Below expectations is below expectations to be sure and the stock drop is both correct and expected, but below expectations doesn't mean doomed. With mass production, they should be able to lower costs of production. Margins will probably remain razor thin, but cutting it close will benefit marketshare, mindshare, and presumably improved software support. I'm not talking about a price cut as drastic as the 3DS, I mean more along the lines of $50 and maybe dropping of the "basic" bundle to reduce production and shelving costs. "Wii U! Now $50 less! All these great games! Orbwhat? Duranwho? Buy today!" It's just business sense. It would deny their competitors sales if Nintendo can position itself with the next CoD, Battlefield, etc. If Nintendo can get the major holiday 2013 multiplatform releases on the WiiU plus major Nintendo releases, suddenly, the WiiU seems like a much more tantalizing offer than Xbox3, and with both Sony and MS looking to phase out their current gen systems for their new consoles, the WiiU will be among the new two as "the new hotness" but for cheap. Makes sense? It's about consumer perception, not what actually looks better, etc.
 

Sandfox

Member
All these games combined probably won´t break the 1 million in their first weaks and months, let alone come anywhere close to 8.

More games people want will cause them to buy older releases when they pick up their consoles such as Mario and they probably include Nintendo Land numbers as well.
 

AOC83

Banned
More games people want will cause them to buy older releases when they pick up their consoles such as Mario and they probably include Nintendo Land numbers as well.

That´s true but the number of people that buy a WiiU for these titles will be rather "small". Except maybe Pikmin none of them have any system seller qualities.
 
LOL, that were so obviously going to do 8mill between them.

XD
I think it's the lowered hardware projections taking a large bite too. Lego City getting pushed to the end of the FY in the west hurts too, it'd have done significantly more as a holiday release (which was the original plan I've been told). Essentially it was 5 big delays, Japan's also getting G&W at the end of March.


Looks like he was right then?
I didn't see anything about attach rate in his backslapping victory tweet, did you?


He predicted the WiiU to be sold out until march. Need i say more?
I'll say more, Wii Plus/HD in 2010!
 

Miles X

Member
I think it's the lowered hardware projections taking a large bite too. Lego City getting pushed to the end of the FY in the west hurts too, it'd have done significantly more as a holiday release (which was the original plan I've been told). Essentially it was 5 big delays, Japan's also getting G&W at the end of March.




I didn't see anything about attach rate in his victory tweet, did you?

He said 4.36 was unrealistic, it's 3.8 and they're aiming for 4?

Therefore he's right ...
 

pvpness

Member
That´s true but the number of people that buy a WiiU for these titles will be rather "small". Except maybe Pikmin none of them have any system seller qualities.

Obviously having those titles would have been better than the nothing that's currently scheduled. Arguing that they wouldn't have made any difference is willful ignorance here man. It's not like one obscure title was pushed to second quarter.

I'm actually kinda curious if Nintendo intentionally pushed these titles because they knew the investors wouldn't riot because of these numbers. Next quarter is gonna be soft (to be nice) so having Pikmin/Wiifit U/Game & Wario there might make it look less like a disaster and more like a disappointment.
 
He said 4.36 was unrealistic, it's 3.8 and they're aiming for 4?

Therefore he's right ...
It's not even a change of 1 (4.36 to 4) and they did within striking distance this quarter (3.82). The attach rate wasn't an unrealistic projection, even if it falls slightly short. It's the absolute figures that took a tumble.
 

Anth0ny

Member
He's talking about software sales

January 30, 2013

3DS NDS Wii Wii U

Hardware 15.00 2.30 4.00 4.00

Software 50.00 33.00 50.00 16.00

-------------------------------------------------------

October 24, 2012

3DS NDS Wii Wii U

Hardware 17.50 2.50 5.00 5.50

Software 70.00 37.00 50.50 24.00

bahahahaah what the fuck

what games were going to sell between launch and march 31 that was going to get them to 24 million?

i'd be surprised if they hit 16 million with the current lineup
 

Margalis

Banned
The attach rate is higher than it has any right to be. This says to me that when more high profile games start coming out they will sell pretty well relative to install base.
 

AOC83

Banned
Obviously having those titles would have been better than the nothing that's currently scheduled. Arguing that they wouldn't have made any difference is willful ignorance here man. It's not like one obscure title was pushed to second quarter.

I didn´t do that. Just said that they´d probably be closer to 1 million than to 8 million.
 
That´s true but the number of people that buy a WiiU for these titles will be rather "small". Except maybe Pikmin none of them have any system seller qualities.
Filler sells systems too. What you need is a combination of the two to really drive hardware consistently. Game & Wario or Wonderful 101 might not be what people rush out to buy a Wii U for, but they add to and diversify the library overall and that can help push system sales. These sort of games support the NSMBUs and Nintendo Lands. They were also part of the reason why Wii fizzled so fast, it had the system sellers but not enough filler long term.
 
I didn´t do that. Just said that they´d probably be closer to 1 million than to 8 million.
I think if they'd released as originally planned, say Lego in December, Wario in January, Pikmin/Fit/101 spread from February to March, that they'd have moved closer to 8m than 1m. Lego, Wario and Fit would each be good for over a million worldwide.

Plus these releases would've added to platform momentum, helping move hardware and by virtue of that other catalogue software. As is, with all of them moved to the end of or out of Q1, it creates a much more problematic dead zone for 2.5 months where current owners aren't buying anything and potential owners are waiting out the drought.
 

NotLiquid

Member
That´s true but the number of people that buy a WiiU for these titles will be rather "small". Except maybe Pikmin none of them have any system seller qualities.

Not entirely familiar with the numbers on the franchise, but was Pikmin ever really a "system seller"? I suspect that if they push the title enough and find a good opportunity to add a deal of features it could turn into one but I was always under the impression that it was only one of the finer lines when it came to IP value.
 

Somnid

Member
Not entirely familiar with the numbers on the franchise, but was Pikmin ever really a "system seller"? I suspect that if they push the title enough and find a good opportunity to add a deal of features it could turn into one but I was always under the impression that it was only one of the finer lines when it came to IP value.

I'm pulling these off the top of my head but I think Pikmin 1 sold about 700K and Pikmin 2 about 400K in NA. Not system sellers but it does help.
 

Margalis

Banned
A system seller is a game that moves hardware. Attach rate has nothing to do with moving hardware.

Words - they mean stuff.
 

lockload

Member
Didn't Nintendo say they are already losing money on each wiiu sold, cutting the price will make it even worce

I really dont think this will get better for them, i see no interest from people who already have a wii, its not price they dont need a new system they very occasionally play it
 
I don't think a price cut is realistic at this point. Best thing they can do right now is more of what they did a week ago - announcing and showing off future games will do very little to help sales for the next few months, but it'll at least help convince investors, third parties, and current/future Wii U owners that the fundamentals for a turnaround later in 2013 are there.
 
Top Bottom