shinobi602
Member
Source: Videogamer
Source: http://www.videogamer.com/ps4/thief/news/confirmed_thief_uses_unreal_engine_3_not_ue4.htmlVideoGamer said:
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Thief on PS4 looks 'almost identical' to PC version, runs on Unreal Engine 3
- Thread starter shinobi602
- Start date
Source: Videogamer
phosphor112
Banned
Less post processing is and 30fps probably. Resolution and AA should be about the same.
NextGen AKA catching up with 2011.
Depends, PCs do let you run much higher resolutions.
Depends, PCs do let you run much higher resolutions.
Moral Panic
Member
8xSSAA 1440p here we come!
kingofthedead45
Member
I have a question, when we were transitioning from ps2/xbox era to ps3/360 how were PC games looking at the time? Did we have these same statements that the console version would look close to their suprior PC versions? Or was the jump from that gen to our current gen that huge? (Bascially were the ps3 and 360 more "powerful" then pc's at the start of current gen?)
shinobi602
Member
Sounds like overkill.
The Omega Man
Member
but will it run almost identical?
developer: Look behind you!! A three-headed monkey!!!
developer: Look behind you!! A three-headed monkey!!!
Still better than catching up with 2006.
I wish they would cheap out on the AA and cheap out even more on the post processing and aim for 60...
But yeah, what you're describing is the most likely scenario. This will be a generation of 1080p30 games with FXAA.
Right, lol this is another thread about the Wii U, I forgot.
hemtae
Member
If you're talking about the resolution part, not at all. Probably for the AA though.
googleplex
Member
No your range of low-Hi is just really skewed.
shinobi602
Member
not_so_special
Banned
im sure no exclusive ps4 game wil look better than thief 4..... yeah
this is just a excuse for PC warriors to do his routine XD
this is just a excuse for PC warriors to do his routine XD
1st Course
Member
The 360 was, the Xenos GPU was more powerfull than the 7800 GTX. The PS3 wasn't, the 8800 GTX was already out by that time.
Glass Rebel
Member
No, I'm pretty sure they will look better.
phosphor112
Banned
Obviously, but most run at 1080p. (30% according to Steam Hardware).
Raitosaito
Member
Will it actually be good though?
PSX and N64 produced better results on average, but the tables turned when dedicated video cards became a big deal.
Xbox, PS2, and Gamecube were not really ahead of PCs at launch in terms of absolute performance, just bang for your buck.
360 and PS3, again, mainly had a lead in terms of price. You could build a PC in late 2005 that would run CoD and Oblivion at higher settings and a better framerate than a 360.
StoppedInTracks
Member
Yeah that's the biggest difference between this gen and the next one. No one could play Oblivion on the PC back when it launched. When Thief 4/ Watch Dogs etc. launch later this year they will right off the bat look & play better on PCs.
Major difference between the two generations right here.
AstroNut325
Member
Shhh. Don't remind him that a huge portion of PCs being sold have integrated Intel graphics.
The games didn't always reflect that.
The 360 port of Doom 3 was sub-30FPS.
Won out in other contemporary games as well.
shinobi602
Member
So... 1080p 60fps?
1080p definitely...not sure about 60fps.
nelsonroyale
Member
Not really surprising considering what we have seen of the game through screenshots
SpartanForce
Member
From the same team that made Deus Ex: HE. I'm sure with will be.
Mihael Mello Keehl
Banned
No that wouldnt make sense a year from now.
Here's my reply from the other thread:
The current slew of screens look bizarre as if they were uprez'd from 720p image (or thereabouts) and then down sampled to 1080p.
Only and only from the stills (perhaps dynamic shadows and other real time visual effects may more than compensate in motion), besides Garrett's hand there it looks like it could be done on current gen consoles (esp. the skin shader).
The current slew of screens look bizarre as if they were uprez'd from 720p image (or thereabouts) and then down sampled to 1080p.
Only and only from the stills (perhaps dynamic shadows and other real time visual effects may more than compensate in motion), besides Garrett's hand there it looks like it could be done on current gen consoles (esp. the skin shader).
not_so_special
Banned
its was a joke,thief 4 its a ue3 game who looks decent at best
at what cost? my gtx680 wasn´t free you know
Opus Angelorum
Member
Unreal Engine 3 sure has made its money.
Yeah, still to say identical is a bit much, besides super sampling just became accessible on AMD GPUs as they have been on Nvidia cards, and you know the funny thing is that super sampling > any type of AA. I'm also comparing it to my resent HD 7950 purchase, which I have clocked (stable) at 1200MHz, giving me 4.3TFLOPs and is keeping its temp under 70c under full load.
P.S. I've made 1 Bitcoin from it so far.
Among console-oriented people who are excited about this stuff, you deserve a lot of credit for having reasonable expectations and keeping your cool.
Somewhere between the sneering PC elite and the console warrior who is incensed at the implication that his favorite machine isn't God's gift to man, there is Shinobi.
KillerTravis
Banned
Where does it say that it will look almost identical? It already looks almost identical right now, it'll probably be identical by the time they finish.
I don't know... UE 3 games run like butter on PC architecture (well for me at least) So I would think that the PC4 version might get a high frame-rate unless they are using some crazy UE3.5 tech for dat gfx fidelity.